- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Economy: Rather Crash & Burn or Slow Burn
Posted on 10/4/23 at 11:22 am
Posted on 10/4/23 at 11:22 am
Assuming we’re going down economically either way, would you rather:
A - Rip the band aid off now and deal with hardship sooner and get through the rough times quicker.
B - Continue on the current path of slow destruction which will probably be worse in the long run and take longer to overcome.
I selfishly lean towards B because the wife and I are in our prime money making years and also have young kids. We’re probably about 10 years out from financial independence assuming inflation doesn’t go crazy.
A will probably get the most votes here as to stop digging this hole we are in. Would also probably be better for the kids as they’re entering the workforce and going out on their own.
A - Rip the band aid off now and deal with hardship sooner and get through the rough times quicker.
B - Continue on the current path of slow destruction which will probably be worse in the long run and take longer to overcome.
I selfishly lean towards B because the wife and I are in our prime money making years and also have young kids. We’re probably about 10 years out from financial independence assuming inflation doesn’t go crazy.
A will probably get the most votes here as to stop digging this hole we are in. Would also probably be better for the kids as they’re entering the workforce and going out on their own.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 11:51 am to Tifway419
Problem is I think A requires some kind of massive shock, and who knows what that would be. Maybe mass unrest after the next election. Or student loan payments have a massive ripple effect combined with commercial real estate bomb bursting.
B is the more likely outcome as it seems like the markets are finally coming to grips with long term raised rates and are slowly winding down to reality.
B is the more likely outcome as it seems like the markets are finally coming to grips with long term raised rates and are slowly winding down to reality.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 12:42 pm to Tifway419
quote:
A - Rip the band aid off now and deal with hardship sooner and get through the rough times quicker.
B - Continue on the current path of slow destruction which will probably be worse in the long run and take longer to overcome.
I would rather A. You can't begin to fix things until the event has run its course. Delaying can imply that maybe some miracle fix will come along (or at least that time will make it feel not as bad).
In this instance, it won't.
To me it "boils" down to do you want to risk being poor or broke a shorter amount of time or a longer one. If I end up having to face that, I want it to be for as short a time as possible before I can start rebuilding my wealth.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 1:21 pm to Tifway419
This:
Does not necessarily mean this:
will happen. One could argue that acute systemic shock to the financial system would have severe unintended consequences. I would take a somewhat controlled burn over uncontrolled chaos.
quote:
Rip the band aid off now and deal with hardship sooner
Does not necessarily mean this:
quote:
get through the rough times quicker.
will happen. One could argue that acute systemic shock to the financial system would have severe unintended consequences. I would take a somewhat controlled burn over uncontrolled chaos.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:23 pm to Tifway419
I guess it would depend on whether I stay employed in scenario A
Same although our kids are older, but we still have one more to put through college in a few years.
quote:
because the wife and I are in our prime money making years
Same although our kids are older, but we still have one more to put through college in a few years.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 6:29 am to Tifway419
Fait accompli, B is already the course. If A was rightfully chosen, then the proverbial band-aid would have started in 2021. But rather, the current administration spent that entire first year in office gaslighting and saying massive inflation and supply chains were just transitory with no Fed hikes, look away nothing to see here. Then Powell was handcuffed in 2022 mid-term election year from doing what he really needed to do, which would have been minimum 100 to 200 basis pts hikes at every single meeting...not merely 25 or 50 bps here and there.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 3:15 am to Tifway419
Assuming wife/I stay employed: A
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:39 am to Tifway419
I've been saving for a crash. With an overinflated market, I'm in the hold position.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 9:50 am to Tifway419
Not to get philosophical, but we've been doing the slow burn since the 90's. Low interest rates, QE since 2008, and fiscal spending way beyond our means is the only reason it doesn't seem like we are worse off - and your portfolio's are high.
It all, unfortunately, ends in a crash of epic proportions. But the stock market may be up after it. Sounds strange, I know, but it may seem like we've recovered because your statements may have the same numbers, but you won't be better off.
For example, the "Great Recession" was low interest rates and government backed loans (to simplify it) and a lack of oversight of the products being created to take advantage of this policy backdrop. Ends in a crash that took out many longstanding strong institutions and a ton of people lost their jobs, but the banks and a lot of the institutions were bailed out with money we didn't collect in taxes and then to make sure the pain went away we started massive QE programs. Continue slow burn...
The problem isn't solved, it just got bigger and more regulated so we can blame greedy corporations (that they'll spend your grandkids money to bail out) or the other political party depending on who's in power when the music stops.
:stepsoffsoapbox:
It all, unfortunately, ends in a crash of epic proportions. But the stock market may be up after it. Sounds strange, I know, but it may seem like we've recovered because your statements may have the same numbers, but you won't be better off.
For example, the "Great Recession" was low interest rates and government backed loans (to simplify it) and a lack of oversight of the products being created to take advantage of this policy backdrop. Ends in a crash that took out many longstanding strong institutions and a ton of people lost their jobs, but the banks and a lot of the institutions were bailed out with money we didn't collect in taxes and then to make sure the pain went away we started massive QE programs. Continue slow burn...
The problem isn't solved, it just got bigger and more regulated so we can blame greedy corporations (that they'll spend your grandkids money to bail out) or the other political party depending on who's in power when the music stops.
:stepsoffsoapbox:
Posted on 10/6/23 at 10:25 am to Tifway419
It doesn’t matter. Because whatever solutions they come up with will only add more pain or set us up for a bigger event in the future.
Why doesn’t anyone ever talk about the depression of 1920-21?
Because the government will never respond to a recession or depression in the same manner.
Why? I have no idea because it worked.
Why doesn’t anyone ever talk about the depression of 1920-21?
Because the government will never respond to a recession or depression in the same manner.
Why? I have no idea because it worked.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 4:33 pm to Bard
quote:
I would rather A. You can't begin to fix things until the event has run its course. D
What exactly needs to be fixed?
Posted on 10/7/23 at 9:36 am to Motownsix
quote:
What exactly needs to be fixed?
The current level of Spending versus a corresponding increase in Productivity .
The average American understands that our government cannot continue excess, wasteful spending at the current levels …. everyone understands this isn’t sustainable.
The current US Debt level must be paid down …. but nobody wants to undertake this painful process. The interest payments on federal government debt is skyrocketing. Debt to GDP is 120% …. waaaaaaaay above historical averages
We haven't seen quarter over quarter growth in real US GDP since Q3 2022. And if we take out the outlier quarters of COVID lockdowns, 2023 has been poor compared 2019.
IMO ….. the federal government either has to cut spending, raise taxes, or the economy has to grow at a faster rate than the debt expansion. I'm struggling to see any of those three things actually happening. Economic growth is slowing. The deficit is actually getting worse. And raising taxes before the 2024 election is highly unlikely.
This post was edited on 10/7/23 at 9:39 am
Posted on 10/7/23 at 10:21 am to cadillacattack
quote:
the federal government either has to cut spending, raise taxes, or the economy has to grow at a faster rate than the debt expansion.
Raise taxes? You serious Clark? How bout this, Potato comes out and crosses the aisle and declares that he was wrong about his war on fossil fuels and all these green unicorn energy initiatives replacing O&G. Congress can then enact legislation putting us back into the driver's seat re-establishing transportation pipelines and cutting all the red tape/burdensome regulations. You know, simple shite versus raising goddamn taxes throwing us into Carter level stagflation.
Posted on 10/7/23 at 10:38 am to Tomatocantender
I’m just saying those are the options available. They can and will raise taxes on us all, I’m afraid. Because they sure as hell ain’t going to stop the Spending … yet the Debt must still be serviced.
I agree about O&G … it is a rising tide that floats all boats …. but it takes time to spin back up, even after the investment taps begin the flow. It would definitely help the Productivity element
I agree about O&G … it is a rising tide that floats all boats …. but it takes time to spin back up, even after the investment taps begin the flow. It would definitely help the Productivity element
Posted on 10/7/23 at 4:01 pm to Motownsix
quote:
What exactly needs to be fixed?
The insane amount of deficit spending by the federal government and the massive credit card debt being run up by consumers.
Posted on 10/8/23 at 12:33 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
Tomatocantender
What's with the politard energy? Both parties spend like drunken sailors. Did you not see what Bush and Trump did in terms of deficit spending?
Posted on 10/8/23 at 6:15 am to Street Hawk
quote:
Street Hawk 12:33am
What's with drunk posting past midnight on a Saturday night on the Money Board of all places?
Popular
Back to top
9











