- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas AG Ken Paxton sets his sights on The Regime
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:29 am to texridder
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:29 am to texridder
quote:
What an a-hole. He acts like he's pure as the driven snow. Everyone in Texas (except for his Repub buddy senators who voted no) knows that Paxton is as crooked as a rattlesnake.
Yeah, one of the charges against him was along the lines of using bribes to remodel his kitchen.
Can you believe the crooked bastard did that?
Only problem, is he didn’t. Another swing and and miss.
Sounds like his defense shredded the prosecution.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:30 am to texridder
I thought you were dead and I had a glass of bourbon to celebrate. Imagine my disappointment when you posted again.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:32 am to KiwiHead
quote:
The problem with most impeachments is that they are inherently political.
Impeachment is a political process. So they’re all political.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:37 am to thebigmuffaletta
He was tried by the Texas Senate GOP after being impeached by the Texas House GOP.
In one of the most conservative states in the country he clung on to his position. Maybe he needs to take a seat.
In one of the most conservative states in the country he clung on to his position. Maybe he needs to take a seat.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:46 am to texridder
Evidence please...we'll wait.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:24 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
You seem to be confused about what guilty means.
Why don't you explain to me what it means.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:31 pm to texridder
My brother in Christ, you’re the one declaring him guilty. The burden of proof falls on you.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:59 pm to tango029
quote:
Yeah the mistress was totally made up, just ask Angela Paxton. Total coincidence she just happens to find a job with Nate Paul.
Prove it. And that’s a picture of his wife.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:46 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
My brother in Christ, you’re the one declaring him guilty. The burden of proof falls on you.
Paxton sold unregistered securities to his clients and was paid an undisclosed commission of 100,000 shares in the company
Paxton's story is that the 100,000 shares were a gift to him from the company's founder.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:56 pm to texridder
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:56 pm to Perse
quote:
You're just too friggin dumb to understand the facts. You are the perfect example of unable to fix stupid.
You're just full of crap.
I gave you the facts and you ignored them as is a typical affliction of you blind, ignorant Trumpaholics.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:00 pm to Mephistopheles
quote:
In one of the most conservative states in the country he clung on to his position.
What a terrible take. He solidified his position big time by slam dunking on the sham of an impeachment.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:05 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
I would love nothing more than to see state governments start to challenge federal authority.
I am a broken record but the answer is simple:
Stop accepting any federal funding then tell them to get out
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:23 pm to texridder
quote:
Why don't you explain why and how the 2015 state securities fraud indictment against Paxton (guilty as sin) has never been brought to trial?
It’s 2023, 3 1/2 months away from 2024.
Almost 9 years. Haven’t those charges been thrown out twice by a Federal Judge?
Or am I thinking of something else? If it’s still valid, why hasn’t it come to trial in almost 9 years?
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:28 pm to dafif
quote:
Stop accepting any federal funding
Exactly why it will never happen. Democrats and Republicans agree here. Fed funding for state projects is a good thing.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:29 pm to texridder
quote:
Why don't you explain then how it happened that Wikileaks released the DMC emails 45 minutes after the Access Hollywood tapes were released. And also explain the interview that Giuliani gave the NYT TWO MONTHS BEFORE the Trump-Zelensky call desvribing how Giuliani was going to Ukraine because Trump wanted Ukraine to continue it's investigation into Hunter Biden and that Giuliani was going GIVE THE UKRAINIANS REASON TO COMTINUE the Biden investigation because
The DNC emails were shown to have been downloaded locally, not in a hackers haven in Siberia. And after John Podesta said an example needed to be made out of the leaker, Seth Rich wound up dead.
Trump/Giuliani were looking into Ukrainian corruption because Biden himself admitted he used our tax dollars as leverage to get the guy investigating it fired.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:55 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
I would have never thought the would be extra room in your head for Paxton to live rent free, but here we are.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 4:58 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I would have never thought the would be extra room in your head for Paxton to live rent free, but here we are.
You're too stupid to actually make a substantive response.
You should stick with down votes. That's your intellectual ceiling. Otherwise, you just look like a jackasse.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 6:26 pm to riverdiver
You know how I know you didn’t watch the trial?
You left out the part where the Paxton’s moved back in after the renovations were completed in July, the whistleblowers went to the FBI on Sept 29th, Cammack notified Paxton he got a cease and desist on the morning of Sept 30th, paxton had a check cut on the night of Sept 30th from his blind trust to a company that wasn’t licensed in the state in July, and the invoice for the work wasn’t actually created until Oct 1st. But if you had watched, I’m sure you would have mentioned that.
So the last time you did renovations, did you have to pay any money up front and did you get to wait months after the work was done to get the bill?
Yes - I watched the trial, and you should too
You left out the part where the Paxton’s moved back in after the renovations were completed in July, the whistleblowers went to the FBI on Sept 29th, Cammack notified Paxton he got a cease and desist on the morning of Sept 30th, paxton had a check cut on the night of Sept 30th from his blind trust to a company that wasn’t licensed in the state in July, and the invoice for the work wasn’t actually created until Oct 1st. But if you had watched, I’m sure you would have mentioned that.
So the last time you did renovations, did you have to pay any money up front and did you get to wait months after the work was done to get the bill?
Yes - I watched the trial, and you should too
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News