- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mark Meadows demands Fulton County charges be moved to federal court
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:26 am
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:26 am
LINK
quote:
Mark Meadows on Tuesday demanded that the two charges leveled against him in Fulton County, Georgia, be moved to federal court — arguing that he was acting within the scope of his authority as a “federal official” when he engaged in the actions cited in the indictment against former President Donald Trump and 18 others.
quote:
“Mr. Meadows is entitled to remove this action to federal court because the charges against him plausibly give rise to a federal defense based on his role at all relevant times as the White House Chief of Staff to the President of the United States,” Meadows’ attorneys wrote in a Tuesday filing in the Northern District of Georgia.
“Nothing Mr. Meadows is alleged in the indictment to have done is criminal per se: arranging Oval Office meetings, contacting state officials on the President’s behalf, visiting a state government building, and setting up a phone call for the President. One would expect a Chief of Staff to the President of the United States to do these sorts of things,” the filing states
quote:
“This is precisely the kind of state interference in a federal official’s duties that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits.”
The former Trump administration official seeks to have his case heard in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, rather than Fulton County, where he will attempt to have the two charges against him dismissed.
“Mr. Meadows intends to file a motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure as soon as is feasible,” the filing states.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
He's a Fed informant. They can't save him in Georgia.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All of that makes sense.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:30 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
He's a Fed informant. They can't save him in Georgia.
The fan fiction never stops.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:33 am to Jon Ham
quote:
All of that makes sense.
It's weak. Everyone in the indictment would have the same "federal official" defense, considering they were all working for or in fact were POTUS.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:33 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This will end up in front of Totenberg and they'll be even more screwed
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:35 am to Jon Ham
A former federal judge says there is a provision that allows this to happen but he doubts a federal judge would view activities aligned with trying to overturn an election as part of his official duties. Time will tell.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:35 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Everyone in the indictment would have the same "federal official" defense, considering they were all working for or in fact were POTUS.
When was Sidney Powell a federal official?
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:37 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:FFS
He's a Fed informant.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
But, but, but Fanni said she was going to try all 19 defendants in her Fulton County Courtroom.
Fanni is even raising campaign funds off of current efforts.
Is Fanni lying to us?

Fanni is even raising campaign funds off of current efforts.
Is Fanni lying to us?
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:38 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
“This is precisely the kind of state interference in a federal official’s duties that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits.”
yup
This indictment gets tossed the quickest
Pure, unadulterated election interference. This is a gift to Trump. Once tossed, his election will be guaranteed. DIMs are so desperate that theyve exposed their stupidity
They know Trump wins in a rematch.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
quote:
He's a Fed informant.
FFS
lol. misspoke. I meant to say cooperating witness.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:41 am to Timeoday
This filing is sort of a big deal. They should all do it. When you remove a case to federal court, the state court's hands are completely tied unless and until the federal court sends it back to the state...which can take months for briefing, hearing, and ruling.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:41 am to Indefatigable
quote:
When was Sidney Powell a federal official?
Kinda the point I was making.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:43 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
It's weak. Everyone in the indictment would have the same "federal official" defense, considering they were all working for or in fact were POTUS
They are testing the waters for trumps removal.
He was acting as president protecting the constitutional republic and the integrity of one of its states elections.
It should be removed
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:44 am to RobbBobb
Guess that’s why every democrat I know hopes republicans stay the course and nominate Trump because they are afraid of him. Nothing will turn out the democratic and independent vote on Election Day like Trump being the nominee.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:46 am to SlimTigerSlap
I must have misunderstood your first post. Only like half of the defendants have the federal defenses to rely on.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:53 am to tarzan84
quote:
Nothing will turn out the democratic and independent vote on Election Day like Trump being the nominee.
A banana republic says Hi
Every time the DIMs have floated something to gain political advantage, manipulated currency, nuclear option, Bork, Thomas, Kavanaugh, court packing, etc it bites them in the arse
Going after your top opponent with the DOJ that you control, doesnt end well for them if they succeed
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:00 am to RobbBobb
Biden is definitely vulnerable but he will beat Trump. Not sure why it’s so hard for some people to understand but 2020 was not about people wanting Biden it was about people hating Trump. You think his actions after the election and all these indictments are going to lessen that feeling in 2024? Sorry, don’t see it. Currently, he has like a 65% unfavorable rating with the American public. That’s not going to get better as these trials start.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:15 am to tarzan84
tarzan84 11 post
Another one.
Another one.
Popular
Back to top


7







