- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
State Bars Catholic Couple From Fostering Due To Traditional Beliefs About Marriage And Ge
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:25 pm
Groomers have infested state government in Massachusetts.
State Bars Catholic Couple From Fostering Due To Traditional Beliefs About Marriage And Gender
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/08/state-bars-catholic-couple-fostering-traditional-beliefs-marriage-gender/
State Bars Catholic Couple From Fostering Due To Traditional Beliefs About Marriage And Gender
quote:
A Catholic couple is suing Massachusetts state officials after allegedly being told they were unable to foster children due to their religious beliefs about marriage and sexuality, according to court documents.
Mike and Catherine “Kitty” Burke went through the process to get certified to begin fostering children in 2022, but were reportedly deemed unfit by the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families (DCF) after a series of home visits, according to court documents. The couple filed a lawsuit Tuesday with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, arguing that the state was deliberately discriminating against them because of their faith.
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/08/state-bars-catholic-couple-fostering-traditional-beliefs-marriage-gender/
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:28 pm to Auburn1968
They need to leave Massachusetts and move to God's country.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:30 pm to Auburn1968
Constitution and Laws be damned..
Leftists are making their move..Executive, Judicial, Alphabets, State Agencies,etc..
Ignoring, Rewriting, Legislating from the Bench, Flat Out Disregard for the Rule of Law..
Schumer said after the Steal..Fundamentally Transform America!
Leftists are making their move..Executive, Judicial, Alphabets, State Agencies,etc..
Ignoring, Rewriting, Legislating from the Bench, Flat Out Disregard for the Rule of Law..
Schumer said after the Steal..Fundamentally Transform America!
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:34 pm to Auburn1968
like i always say, about libtardism in politics
sue the frick out of the state, they will learn the hard way
sue the frick out of the state, they will learn the hard way
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:39 pm to Auburn1968
Sure sounds like discrimination on the basis of religious affiliation.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:50 pm to udtiger
quote:
Sure sounds like discrimination on the basis of religious affiliation.
Wonder if these same Progs would tell a Muslim family no.
Rhetorical question, of course.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 4:54 pm to udtiger
quote:
thejudge
Fixing to get paid
quote:Let's say this is true. What specific law is violated if a state declines to allow a person to foster kids, based upon religious beliefs of the person?
Sure sounds like discrimination on the basis of religious affiliation.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Let's say this is true. What specific law is violated if a state declines to allow a person to foster kids, based upon religious beliefs of the person?
You think a it wouldn't be a violation of the Civil Right Act of 64 if a state declined to allow a gay couple to foster kids? The catch all clause in Title II pretty much covers almost any government program. And Title VI covers anything with federal assistance. Doesn't matter what the state says.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:06 pm to PeleofAnalytics
He'd be screaming bloody murder
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:09 pm to Auburn1968
But they just wanted to get married, there's no slippery slope.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:12 pm to PeleofAnalytics
quote:I express no opinion here ... just ask a question.
Let's say this is true. What specific law is violated if a state declines to allow a person to foster kids, based upon religious beliefs of the person?quote:
You think a it wouldn't be a violation of the Civil Right Act of 64 if a state declined to allow a gay couple to foster kids?
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:27 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Let's say this is true. What specific law is violated if a state declines to allow a person to foster kids, based upon religious beliefs of the person
Well...let's see...
quote:
state
quote:
declines to allow a person to foster kids, based upon religious beliefs of the person
Now...
Let's talk about that pesky equal protection clause...
Posted on 8/8/23 at 5:38 pm to Auburn1968
This may not be a bad thing.
If Massachusetts can limit those to have traditional beliefs, I'm guessing the more conservative states can decide that homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to foster or adopt.
If Massachusetts can limit those to have traditional beliefs, I'm guessing the more conservative states can decide that homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to foster or adopt.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I express no opinion here ... just ask a question
Sorry. Seemed a bit of a no duh question. What state level law that discriminates against a specific religion is not going to get struck down at the federal level? I mean there could be a law in Idaho that bans heterosexual males from getting a drivers license but common sense tells anyone that the federal law will override a stupid state law like that. The law could stand in the books for the next 50 years but can't be enforced.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I express no opinion here ... just ask a question.
1. You say you did not express an opinion.
2. You say you asked "just a question".
Wow takes a really shitty lawyer to ask a message board to show him the law that was broken.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:24 pm to Auburn1968
They just want to be married and able to express live like everyone else.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:33 pm to moneyg
quote:
If Massachusetts can limit those to have traditional beliefs, I'm guessing the more conservative states can decide that homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to foster or adopt
Probably not, my man. If you actually cared about facts you'd accept that by any metric, children are safer with LGBTQ over catholic priests. But your Biden derangement syndrome-addled brain won't accept that
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:38 pm to thejudge
quote:for what damages? the state is pure evil but not sure this couple was harmed in a way a court would grant them anything of significance.
Fixing to get paid
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News