- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Non-Political Mississippi River Question
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:56 pm to TIGERHOLD
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:56 pm to TIGERHOLD
quote:But the Mississippi was a major highway of commerce long before the US expanded that far, back to when the French owned both banks.
The United States developed from East to West, rather than vice versa. Makes sense to build a town on the side of the river closer to civilization, especially before there were any bridges
I think Tittle has the answer, and the bluffs mostly being on the Left Bank is just coincidence.
Thanks for the thought.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:57 pm to Rebel
quote:Rebel, most of the cities in question were founded by the French when it owned both sides, and they did not move east from Appalachia. They moved up and down the river, from the Gulf and from French Canada.
Because settlers moving west generally stopped on the east bank first and started their communities there.
They didn’t have bridges back then Hank. It was a bitch to ferry supplies across.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Odd that the bluffs all seem to be on the Left Bank, but it is what it is.
For the most part, we have stopped the river at the eastern edge of its historical meandering - at least in the lower section.
The Mississippi Delta area is the exception.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Odd that the bluffs all seem to be on the Left Bank, but it is what it is.
It isn’t odd at all Geo-Hank if you understood tectonic plates and fault lines.
Why would you come in here and tell people that actually grew up and live at various points on the river that we use improper vernacular?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
Just passed over the river at St Louis. What side of the river is that city on?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
But the Mississippi was a major highway of commerce long before the US expanded that far, back to when the French owned both banks.
And before the US expanded that far, there were French settlements on the East side. Because that's closer to France. You know. Where they came from.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:58 pm to TigerSprings
quote:
St. Louis is on the wrong side.
St Louis was built near the Mississippi River and Missouri River confluence. West side made the most sense.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:59 pm to rhar61
quote:I made it political when I brought Rising Tide into the discussion. If the bullshite in that book leading up to the great flood, nothing is. Oh, and it's mostly New Orleans politics.
Why the frick is this on THIS board, named POLITICAL Talk.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 1:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Rebel, most of the cities in question were founded by the French when it owned both sides, and they did not move east from Appalachia.
What part of France did Hernando Desoto come from?
Jesus Christ.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:01 pm to rhar61
quote:Because the bulk of this forum have some sort of cultural ties to the Mississippi river, and I thought someone would know the answer.
Why the frick is this on THIS board, named POLITICAL Talk.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
New Orleans
Baton Rouge
Natchez
Vicksburg
Memphis
etc.
Typically the east bank is higher ground, besides NOLA
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Because the bulk of this forum have some sort of cultural ties to the Mississippi river, and I thought someone would know the answer.
What specifically about the Political Board makes you believe members have a greater connection to the Mississippi here than on other boards?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:03 pm to Rebel
quote:You can use whatever terminology you want. I simply explained my usage to a poster who insisted that it was incorrect. It is not.
Why would you come in here and tell people that actually grew up and live at various points on the river that we use improper vernacular?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:05 pm to AggieHank86
It's likely that, that is reason the cities are located on that particular spot along the East side of the river. Not that they are on the "Left" side in the first place.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You can use whatever terminology you want. I simply explained my usage to a poster who insisted that it was incorrect. It is not.
Except it was incorrect. You said using relative directions is better than compass directions, but the relative direction is relative based upon a compass direction.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:06 pm to The Baker
quote:
higher ground, besides NOLA
The French Quarter actually is the high ground.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I thought someone would know the answer.
And despite been given the very obvious answer multiple times you choose to be a contrarian a-hole per usual.
You claim the French settled Natchez, Vicksburg, and Memphis.
You are as wrong as defending child groomers. But you do that too. Do you ever wonder why most people find you unlikable?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:09 pm to AggieHank86
My guess is trade mostly went that direction in the beginning. For various reasons, like high ground, bigger/closer cities in east, etc...
It probably even followed native American trading lanes like the Natchez Trace. By the time the west grew there were bridges and ferries.
It probably even followed native American trading lanes like the Natchez Trace. By the time the west grew there were bridges and ferries.
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:10 pm to efrad
quote:Fraud, if you see some sort of "gotcha," you are imagining it.
Seriously. I'm waiting for some kind of gotcha.
ETA: I was beaten by mere seconds with Hank's dumb gotcha.
Again, I think Tittle provided the answer with the bluffs. It is just a coincidence/accident of geography that the bluffs are mostly on the Right Bank.
Here in Texas, what we call the "high bank" of a river switches sides a lot as the river moves through the state, sometimes several times in a few dozen miles. Apparently, the Mississippi doesn't do that.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 2:10 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Non-Political Mississippi River Question
It was easier to settle the east side of the river and bring shite to the bank in the olden days. Otherwise they would have had to haul stuff across a pretty large, world class river to settle. Look at the day of origin for the various cities. I'd assume cities with ports on the West Bank were "incorporated" into port cities at later dates. Just a guess.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News