- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Okay you're a ding dong
1
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Well, a few imbeciles say that YOU say it does not exist. Close enough?
Nobody has said trafficking does not exist.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think Leo has ever gone on camera discussing adrenochrome
Oh wow. Caviezel did this? (He didn’t.)
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:21 pm to AggieHank86
For anyone else clicking on this thread, you can literally skip the last 30 pages and not miss anything of relevance
Don't waste your time
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Is that a long winded way to reference drug abuse/addiction?
Drug abuse is a symptom of lower SES problems, typically from trauma related to
quote:
psychological abuse, sexual abuse, and rejection of LGBTQ children.
Bad homes create runaways.
Bad homes are a function of lower SES
If we combat domestic sex trafficking, it will require decreasing the supply of potentially trafficked, which means reducing homeless teens.
We know we can't do anything of substance or efficiency by attaching the demand. That will be WOD vol 2: Electric Boogaloo (Lots of money spent. Lots of headlines. No real impact on volume).
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's literally in the title of the thread so no because I didn't make the thread
It’s in the title because that’s the accusation of the movie from idiots like you.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
You want to add any more types of the trafficking scares?
Ask the Q-mmunity. I'm discussing their beliefs.
I don't believe in Illuminati or SRA
I'm working with what they gave me.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Well, a few imbeciles say that YOU say it does not exist. Close enough?
His fixation is the issue here
Dudes has a word class obsession with Satan
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:23 pm to mjthe
quote:
Okay you're a ding dong
What is your specific argument?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:23 pm to captdalton
quote:JFC, not what he said.
You also inferred that Mexican cartels are not involved in human trafficking because their is not a research paper proving it
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:24 pm to the808bass
quote:
Caviezel did this? (He didn’t.)
Is this entirely fabricated?
That account isn't some liberal rag. They're promoting the movie.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:24 pm to wutangfinancial
quote:
Didn't you bring Q into the discussion?
The discussion of this film started on this board at least a month ago
First thread I saw was something like “Hollywood deep state pedos gonna kill Mel Gibson and Jim Cavezeil for exposing child sex trafficking in new movie!”
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The mythology Q subscribers promoted has been around a while. 30-40 years at least
Cool, so this film has been in the works for a LONG time. Maybe it is good. Is it?
Surely you have seen it. You certainly are an expert on it’s content. Is it a good movie worth seeing?
Also, explain Q to us. You also seem very knowledgeable about it. And many here came around after the legendary “Q thread” everyone is always referencing. I do see a lot of Q memes in the meme thread. A lot don’t seem to make that much sense. Much like this thread. Maybe it would help your argument if more people could understand what the hell you have even been rambling on about for 30 plus pages.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:25 pm to captdalton
You're wasting your time they argue to argue
they argue to arguePosted on 7/10/23 at 5:25 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
First thread I saw was something like “Hollywood deep state pedos gonna kill Mel Gibson and Jim Cavezeil for exposing child sex trafficking in new movie!”
On brand
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Ask the Q-mmunity. I'm discussing their beliefs.
Yeah. That was my point. You’re conflating a dozen ideas of trafficking conspiracies into a monolith that you then label Qanon and then find a union with the idea of Satanic ritualistic abuse from the 80s. It’s so sloppy and haphazard that it should be embarrassing. Your ego is well past admitting that you’re not even sure what you’re arguing anymore.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:26 pm to tzimme4
I'd trust him around my kids 
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yeah. That was my point. You’re conflating a dozen ideas of trafficking conspiracies into a monolith that you then label Qanon and then find a union with the idea of Satanic ritualistic abuse from the 80s. It’s so sloppy and haphazard that it should be embarrassing. Your ego is well past admitting that you’re not even sure what you’re arguing anymore.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
He's asking questions while he does it though,
So he's cool or Q or something?
So he's cool or Q or something?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
You’re conflating a dozen ideas of trafficking conspiracies into a monolith that you then label Qanon
Dude they still post that mythology on this board to this day
quote:
then find a union with the idea of Satanic ritualistic abuse from the 80s
They did this themselves. They still post about this pretty regularly on here.
quote:
It’s so sloppy and haphazard that it should be embarrassing.
Again, blame the Q-mmunity. I agree it's sloppy. I'm just posting receipts
Page 35 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News