- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch on the Trump Indictment
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:58 pm to buckeye_vol
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:58 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Yeah. Tom, who is not a lawyer,
Are you a lawyer?
0
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:00 pm to jlnoles79
quote:
Am I supposed to pretend Trump wasn't an idiot?
No doubt there is a double standard, but Trump absolutely fricked himself here
Don't salivate desantis boy, it is unseemly
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:15 pm to jbdawgs03
Ronbois may have worse TDS than MSNBC leftist liberals do. It’s hilarious.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:19 pm to WPBTiger
The perps of this political abuse need to be in jail too.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:24 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Most, if not all, of us in this thread are not lawyer
You can’t swing a dead cat around here without hitting a lawyer, but this isn’t a battle of resumes. Even if you take the most ardent Trump supporter, they likely concede many of the things you quote from Turkey, namely,
- His indictment is more detailed than Braggs; and
-His indictment is more thoroughly sourced with factual evidence then Bragg
Most of the discussion, I’ve seen has been on questions of law, prosecutorial precedent, and uneven application of the statutes. The authority on those questions would be case law, not Andrew MCCarthy or Judd Nelson. It’s a reasonable discussion to have at this point
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:29 pm to jlnoles79
quote:
Fitton isn't a lawyer
He has lawyers working for him and he has been very successful at exposing DC BS.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:36 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
What's your IQ buddy?
116.
10/10 troll.
I hope.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:41 pm to dukkbill
quote:
You can’t swing a dead cat around here without hitting a lawyer, but this isn’t a battle of resumes. Even if you take the most ardent Trump supporter, they likely concede many of the things you quote from Turkey, namely,
- His indictment is more detailed than Braggs; and
-His indictment is more thoroughly sourced with factual evidence then Bragg
Most of the discussion, I’ve seen has been on questions of law, prosecutorial precedent, and uneven application of the statutes. The authority on those questions would be case law, not Andrew MCCarthy or Judd Nelson. It’s a reasonable discussion to have at this point
Very reasonable down middle take.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:42 pm to Strannix
quote:So citing the same legal expert who has been cited on here for his defenses of Trump is now TDS? It’s not like I cited some notorious never trumper or anything.
Your TDS is stage 4
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:15 pm to buckeye_vol
OMB!
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:15 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Iran War battle planning documents sure sound like "personal records". lolzzz
Yeah, the illegitimate regime needs those plans….lol
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:18 pm to buckeye_vol
Go suck Jack Smith off
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:34 pm to GregMaddux
quote:Am I supposed to do what others do and lie about my IQ and say I have like a 136 IQ or something? I’m perfectly content with just being a little above average.
10/10 troll. I hope
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:45 pm to WPBTiger
They are the only entity besides church I've donated money to.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:46 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Yeah. Tom, who is not a lawyer,
Judicial Watch has been doing this shite for years.
Wtf are you to talk shite
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:48 pm to GRTiger
quote:793 is the top charge listed in the indictment on page 1. I don't see 1924.
Can someone confirm that Trump was charged under 18 USC 793 and not 18 USC 1924?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:51 pm to WPBTiger
quote:
DOJ will be going to Court of Appeals to have her removed from the case.
I find it hard to believe that will work. If simply being appointed by Trump was enough, then there would be reason to remove literally any judge.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:51 pm to Auburn1968
quote:His group works mostly with FOIA cases which are very simple cases to bring. But just because his group has lawyers doesn't give any weight to his own opinions.
He has lawyers working for him and he has been very successful at exposing DC BS.
ETA: I am also pretty sure he lost the "Clinton sock drawer" case, as he should have.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 10:41 pm to imjustafatkid
True
Posted on 6/9/23 at 11:27 pm to BuckyCheese
Democrats are brainwashed severely. These threads are proof.
Hillary innocent. Biden innocent. Trump guilty.
It's almost impossible to go through life that blind.
Hillary innocent. Biden innocent. Trump guilty.
It's almost impossible to go through life that blind.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News