- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch on the Trump Indictment
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:32 pm
13
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:35 pm to WPBTiger
quote:
If justice prevails, this indictment won't survive scrutiny by honest, constitutionalist judges and will be thrown out.
I think I found the fly in the ointment....
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:36 pm to WPBTiger
In other words, a far left wing hack judge will preside over the case and Trump is fricked
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:38 pm to WPBTiger
@pankReb your thoughts?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:40 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
In other words, a far left wing hack judge will preside over the case and Trump is fricked
I think he got one of his own appointees.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:41 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I think he got one of his own appointees.
DOJ will be going to Court of Appeals to have her removed from the case.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:41 pm to WPBTiger
Yeah. Tom, who is not a lawyer, was the one telling Trump this in 2021-2022, against the actual advice from everyone else, including actual lawyers. He was wrong then, and he’s wrong now. If Trump did the opposite of what Tom advised, he would not be in the mess.
If it was because he listened to Fitton, then Fitton will go down in the history books as the guy whose dumb and clearly incorrect advise led to the first conviction of a former president. While not the first charges against him (the NYC Stormy Daniels case), this one is a much stronger case, so the conviction is much more likely.
MAGA should hate Fitton, and the resistance is probably happy Fitton is such an idiot, but nobody should be listening to his idiocy.
If it was because he listened to Fitton, then Fitton will go down in the history books as the guy whose dumb and clearly incorrect advise led to the first conviction of a former president. While not the first charges against him (the NYC Stormy Daniels case), this one is a much stronger case, so the conviction is much more likely.
MAGA should hate Fitton, and the resistance is probably happy Fitton is such an idiot, but nobody should be listening to his idiocy.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:44 pm to buckeye_vol
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:48 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Yeah. Tom, who is not a lawyer, was the one telling Trump this in 2021-2022, against the actual advice from everyone else, including actual lawyers. He was wrong then, and he’s wrong now. If Trump did the opposite of what Tom advised, he would not be in the mess.
He claims anything a former president decides to take from the WH upon exit is his personal property.
He can't be serious.
quote:
They are ALL his personal records and, frankly, should be returned to him.
Iran War battle planning documents sure sound like "personal records". lolzzz
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:48 pm to WPBTiger
They have already started on denigrating her
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:50 pm to WPBTiger
Fitton isn't a lawyer
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:51 pm to WPBTiger
In other words he's f’d.
Thanks, Tom
Thanks, Tom
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:51 pm to jlnoles79
quote:
Fitton isn't a lawyer
Doesn't seem very bright either going off this statement.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:52 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
He can't be serious.
Why not? It's law.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:55 pm to WPBTiger
One doesn’t have to be a lawyer to express the opinions that he and his slew of lawyers have. Beating the DC deep state is sport for Fitton. His aim is good
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:58 pm to jlnoles79
interesting what side you seem to be taking in this
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:02 pm to jbdawgs03
Think he’s referring to case la w, and the Clinton’s sock drawer ruling, as precedent
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:08 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:And it’s a nonsensical comparison. Those were Clinton’s own audiotapes of interviews of Clinton and his biographer. I’m not sure why anyone would wonder why those would be considered personal property.
Think he’s referring to case la w, and the Clinton’s sock drawer ruling, as precedent
Regardless to argue that because those were determined to be personal, then anything, including literal national security plans if the military invaded another nation, are also personal records, is just outlandishly illogical. And it’s just wrong.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:08 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
interesting what side you seem to be taking in this
Am I supposed to pretend Trump wasn't an idiot?
No doubt there is a double standard, but Trump absolutely fricked himself here
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:09 pm to WPBTiger
GOPe finds itself on the other side of Tom Fitton. Pay attention.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News