Started By
Message

4 SCOTUS Justices will hear Loy Brunson v. Alam Adams, et, al. on 06/24.

Posted on 6/8/23 at 1:42 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119031 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 1:42 pm
From this date the justices could decide on a full hearing sometime in October.

This is the description from a Bill Still video on the matter:

quote:

Loy Brunson is a Constitutional scholar and one of 4 Brunson brothers. One of his greatest discoveries about the U.S. Constitution is that members of Congress do not have the broad immunity that many of them think they do.

This revelation about Congressional immunity may soon play a huge role in an upcoming case that may soon come before the United States Supreme Court.

At this time the Supremes could make a decision that would remove the President, Vice President, and a sizeable majority of members of Congress from their roles as representatives of the people of the United States of America for refusing to do any sort of an examination of the results of the 2020 election. Failure to take on this Constitutional responsibility – regardless of what Mike Pence has to say on this matter, could be considered a national security emergency requiring emergency judicial action.

At that time, the Supremes could order that special elections would be held barely months into the future to replace the displaced Senators and Congressional representatives – probably the most remarkable positive event in American history.


Rule 11 gives the Supremes the ability to move a case to a decision very swiftly because if granted, it recognizes that making a decision on the matter in very urgent to the overall health of the nation. It is done as a matter of a national emergency.


Link to petition: LINK

Link to Bill Still video discussing the case with Loy Brunson: LINK

Fun to keep track of but don't get your hopes up. (And I lol @ just the thought of SCOTUS removing the president, VP and most of congress). What is amazing is 4 justices are willing to even start the process at the SCOTUS level considering ALL the request for a hearing they get per year.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96446 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 1:46 pm to
If it looks like this gets a favorable reception, the attempts to either kill or coerce members of the court will step up.
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
24357 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

could be considered a national security emergency requiring emergency judicial action


Could be?

And why only now? After all the destruction, proxy wars, stolen tax dollars, open borders, etc etc.
Posted by dr
texas
Member since Mar 2022
1131 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 1:49 pm to
this will be very interesting

I read some on it, and is is basicly failure to fulfill their oath of office.

if they favorably rule, it will change the nature of politics, proving the politicians are liable
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
2449 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 2:19 pm to
Wake up, the fbi and cia leveraged most of Congress, they won't let SCOTUS invalidate any politician they control.

Stop pretending we are a functioning Republic.

Defund the cia and fbi.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 2:22 pm to
What are they going to hear on June 24th?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11291 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 2:34 pm to
It would be
quote:

the most remarkable positive event in American history.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57387 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

At this time the Supremes could make a decision that would remove the President, Vice President, and a sizeable majority of members of Congress from their roles as representatives of the people of the United States of America


That’s weird, Diana Ross is the only one still alive.



Who knew they had this kind of power?
This post was edited on 6/8/23 at 3:21 pm
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 3:43 pm to
I guess even Supreme Court Justices are forced to listen to ridiculous bullshite cases.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24969 posts
Posted on 6/8/23 at 4:33 pm to
SCOTUS refused to hear Trump's arguments after the Great Fraud of 2020 because "Mr. Trump cannot claim this has affected him, since he is still the President".

Then, after Biden was installed, SCOTUS again refused to hear Trump's arguments, this time saying, "Mr. Trump has no standing, as this election has been certified by Congress. It is illegal for Congress to certify a fraudulent election, therefore the Congressionally certified election results are legal."

Who among us still believes that the fricking spineless SCOTUS will do anything good going forward? They're completely terrified (rightfully so) of the unhinged mob that will descend upon them if they start upholding what is left of the Constitution.


....


Want a REAL reason to remove the ENTIRETY of Congress? Ask them what their primary job as House members and Senators is. The answer? The #1 job of a freely elected Congress is to pass a fricking yearly BUDGET. Kicking the can down the road with lazy omnibus bills packed with pork and ramming through unconstitutional measures via bypass is NOT their job, but it's all they do.

Congress hasn't passed an actual budget in two generations, folks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram