- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Remember the Arizona Audit?
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:12 am
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:12 am
Anyone remember the Arizona Audit? The one financed by Trump supporters that found no evidence of fraud?
How does the Trump base explain this one? Shouldn't it have found at least some evidence? It's funny how this has been erased from memory around here...
How does the Trump base explain this one? Shouldn't it have found at least some evidence? It's funny how this has been erased from memory around here...
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:14 am to TIGERHOLD
It actually found a lot of evidence of fraud but don’t let that change your narrative
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:15 am to TIGERHOLD
Ignoring the fraud that was uncovered doesn’t mean there was no fraud; I it just means you have your head in the sand.
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:16 am to TulaneFan
Ah yes, Gateway Pundit found all that evidence of fraud. GP also told me that 140,000 democrat ballots in Atlanta were going to be declared fraudulent...why didn't that happen?
quote:
An edited version of the report, which stated: "The election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable", was spread by QAnon and The Gateway Pundit, the latter of which baselessly claimed that the Arizona State Senate had pressured for the above line to be removed. Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan has said that this edited report "is a false version" of the audit report, and that the notion that the Arizona State Senate had issued threats to suppress the edited report was "absolutely false".[132][133] Arizona State Senate audit liaison Randy Pullen, a former chairman of the Arizona Republican Party, also stated that the edited report was "a fake document", and further said that "there was never a discussion about decertifying" the election.[134] During a October 2021 podcast where conservative activist Joe Oltmann was interviewing Doug Logan, Oltmann admitted to being the person who released the edited version of the report.[135][136]
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:17 am to TIGERHOLD
There was a lot of fraud.
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:20 am to jrodLSUke
quote:actually it means that the poster supports election theft and the ongoing destruction of the USA
Ignoring the fraud that was uncovered doesn’t mean there was no fraud; I it just means you have your head in the sand.
NOT a good look
AT ALL. - it crosses the same line the marxian goons crossed.
quote:
"Arizona. In the Grand Canyon State, the focus of observer skepticism was Maricopa County (Phoenix and environs), by far the state’s largest county. Election observers reported that many signatures on ballots were not checked, and that the signatures on many ballots were written in the same hand. A pattern recognition expert found that 97 percent of the signatures on Maricopa ballots received before Election Day were legible, but only 3 percent of those received afterward were – a detail from which one might reasonably surmise that the latter signatures had been forged by ballot harvesters who were rushing against the clock. Shiva Ayyadurai, an engineer and entrepreneur who’s known as Dr. Shiva, uncovered a widespread failure in Maricopa to reject ballots with bad or no signatures. Last year, a study by Dr. Shiva, commissioned by the Arizona Senate, showed that up to 204,000 Maricopa ballots bore fake signatures.
After Election Day – when Arizona was awarded to Biden, with a reported tally of 1.67 million to Trump’s 1.66 million (four years earlier, Trump had won the state with 1.25 million votes to Hillary Clinton’s 1.16 million) – the State Senate ordered an audit of Maricopa. The county promptly sued to block it and conducted a “self-audit,” a concept that Fried dismisses as “ridiculous.” When the Senate’s audit finally did get underway, Maricopa election officials and the county’s Soros-funded sheriff tried to squash it – refusing to cooperate with the auditors, denying them access to routers, and blocking their attempts to verify signatures. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs joined in this effort, while Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the Department of Justice complained that the auditors’ attempt to investigate charges of ballot harvesting amounted to “voter intimidation” and Members of Congress Carol Maloney (D-NY) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) accused the auditors of embracing “conspiracy theories.” This full court press worked: the audit was abandoned (Fried calls the whole thing “disgraceful”) and the mainstream media dutifully reported that the auditors had certified Biden’s win."
This post was edited on 5/3/23 at 10:34 am
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:20 am to hogcard1964
I tried looking up the results the audit team released but surprisingly it has been scrubbed clean from the internet
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:25 am to TIGERHOLD
Remember that time Biden told us that 51 intelligence officials said that his son's laptop didn't actually exist and was just another Russian disinformation campaign? Then remember when Hunter sued the laptop repair shop for turning over his information on the laptop that doesn't exist?
Yeah we do too
Yeah we do too
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:27 am to TheSadvocate
Both sides can lie. One side lying does not mean the other side is telling the truth.
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:27 am to TIGERHOLD
quote:
Anyone remember the Arizona Audit? The one financed by Trump supporters that found no evidence of fraud? How does the Trump base explain this one? Shouldn't it have found at least some evidence? It's funny how this has been erased from memory around here...
You think the 2020 GE and 2022 midterms were conducted with little to no rigging?
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:28 am to TIGERHOLD
You mean the one where the Maricopa county BoS ignored court orders and their obligation to follow the law? Yea. That's when we all got to see who is in the club and who is not.
Thanks for the reminder
Thanks for the reminder
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:29 am to TIGERHOLD
trump paid two companies to find 2020 fraud nationally.
neither found anything.
neither found anything.
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:29 am to TIGERHOLD
quote:
TIGERHOLD
What a cringy fricked up post.

Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:31 am to TIGERHOLD
Surprise surprise Ronbots supporting fraud just like the leftists
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:31 am to TIGERHOLD
They absolutely found fraud. the SOS wouldnt act on it.
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:31 am to TIGERHOLD
quote:
Anyone remember the Arizona Audit? The one financed by Trump supporters that found no evidence of fraud?
Nope. Don’t remember that one. I remember the one that did find fraud
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:32 am to TIGERHOLD
There was fraud right out in the open but Trump got a bunch of clowns to try and expose it. The left just laughed their arse off at how Trump handled it because it made it that much easier to push the conspiracy theory narrative
Posted on 5/3/23 at 10:32 am to TulaneFan
quote:
I tried looking up the results the audit team released but surprisingly it has been scrubbed clean from the internet
That's because the republicans who paid for it don't want to continue to look like the morons that they are. Better to let the liars and conspiracy kooks have the information space than make the actual findings of the audit available.
Popular
Back to top
