- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NATO wants to deploy 300,000 troops on Russia's border.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:01 am to ReeseBobby
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:01 am to ReeseBobby
You’re being down voted because you have no idea of what you’re talking about. Nobody here wants to waste time trying to explain it to you because you people have proven that you don’t want the truth. You only want to believe what YOU feel is the truth and what MSM tells you to believe.
1
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:04 am to TigahTeeth
So you specifically don’t want European NATO members to be stronger and pull there weight?
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:10 am to Wardniner01
quote:
Grasping at straws liberal boy
He is not grasping at straws. This is indeed what Trump wanted. Not the war in Ukraine, but the taking on of more responsibility and costs for the defense of Europe by European countries.
Trump correctly pointed out that America is burdened with too much of the cost of defending Europe.
The twitter quote is just fake news.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:10 am to Jjdoc
quote:
MessageJjdocNATO wants to deploy 300,000 troops on Russia's border.
frick this. USA needs to get ahold of this bullshite and say no.
I can’t believe this shite is happening. Me and my kids are gonna he incinerated over fricking worthless, shitstain Ukraine.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:13 am to ReeseBobby
Pull their weight?
Dude, we’ve spent over $100B and counting on Ukraine. From USA Today...
USA Today
www.usatoday.com
US has spent billions on Ukraine war aid. But is that money landing in ...
Feb 19, 2023 — WASHINGTON – With more than $100 billion in U.S. weaponry and financial aid flowing to Ukraine in less than a year – and more on the way
As the second largest donor, the UK has committed £2.3 billion in military assistance to Ukraine so far and has pledged to match that assistance in 2023.
Dude, we’ve spent over $100B and counting on Ukraine. From USA Today...
USA Today
www.usatoday.com
US has spent billions on Ukraine war aid. But is that money landing in ...
Feb 19, 2023 — WASHINGTON – With more than $100 billion in U.S. weaponry and financial aid flowing to Ukraine in less than a year – and more on the way
As the second largest donor, the UK has committed £2.3 billion in military assistance to Ukraine so far and has pledged to match that assistance in 2023.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:14 am to ReeseBobby
quote:
ReeseBobby
Number of Posts:136
Registered on:10/24/2021
Almost every Nato country in Europe has passed significant increases in defense budgets. Everyone who has complained about Europes lack of commitment should stop complaining because Putin has single handily strengthened Nato. This is what Trump wanted remember.
New talking points are in, deploy the tactical bots.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:15 am to LuckyTiger
I’m talking about increased defense budgets not Ukraine aide
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:16 am to POTUS2024
quote:
division among citizens
Biden the uniter
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:27 am to ReeseBobby
I’m all for that and if the Russian bear gets them or some of them to do that, then great.
But we are still footing the lion’s share for Europe’s security. They’re a lot smarter than we are. Why wouldn’t they? When you know Uncle Sam will provide?
But we are still footing the lion’s share for Europe’s security. They’re a lot smarter than we are. Why wouldn’t they? When you know Uncle Sam will provide?
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:32 am to Taurus
quote:
No doubt to me Putin waited until Biden got in office he was going to make them pay.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:37 am to ReeseBobby
quote:
Putin has single handily strengthened Nato. This is what Trump wanted remember.
You make an excellent point. Europe appears to be standing up, even adding two new countries to NATO. This is good stuff. Let them stand united and deal with Russia, it's their threat on their side of the Atlantic ocean. According to everything I've read, NATO's military is more than capable of giving Russia all it could handle.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:46 am to Jjdoc
I have no problem with staging troops in Germany, Hungary, and Romania west of Bucharest. It's far enough to not threaten Russia, but close enough to defend Poland and the rest of NATO if Russia pushes their fight that far west.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:46 am to ReeseBobby
quote:
So you specifically don’t want European NATO members to be stronger and pull there weight?
It appears it's a little late for the EU faction of NATO to spend the necessary money for a military deterrent......Russia already invaded.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News