Should I read Howard Zinn’s “ people’s history of the United States”?

Zinn's interpretation of history is intentionally biased, and he is upfront about his perspective being informed by Marxist ideology. He focuses on the struggle between different social classes and believes that marginalized groups have been systematically oppressed by powerful elites throughout American history. Rather than striving for objectivity, Zinn presents a deliberately partial perspective that seeks to illuminate the experiences and struggles of these marginalized groups. As Zinn himself acknowledges in the introduction of the book...

quote:

---

I prefer to try to tell their [the oppressed] story with as little subjective distortion as possible, but with my own ideology: not neutrality, but the will to power of the subjugated.

---

quote:

---

Should I read Howard Zinn’s “ people’s history of the United States”?

---

I mean, not all of it is dogshit.

But it is important to note that it is a work of historical fiction.

If you read it, make sure to use this as a quick reference

No bruh

They should change the name to “Israel’s history of the United States”

It’s all anti American propaganda and it’s disgusting they made us read it in high school

ETA: check out the first line of Howard zinns “early life” section on Wikipedia lol

Yes. But also read several different points of view. In my humble opinion, Zinn's take is not only existentially horrific, it is intellectually weak af, based on documentation.
Similar to Said's Orientalism, Zinn is important in understanding the Leftist ideology toward history, and the foundational texts it is based on. Regardless of your personal ideology, it is important to understand where they are coming from.

I read half of it and threw it away. It’s absolute bullshite, I don’t care what Will Hunting says. Lol