Someone explain the "neutral site" reasoning for me.

Had Cincy won the canceled game, they would have had the home-field advantage in that game vs Buffalo yet they still played that as though Buffalo Should have home-field vs Cincy. Although I understand a conference championship game is more significant than the qualifying game, there is only one reason it makes sense to me that they would do that in the Buffalo/KC matchup but not the Cincy/Buffalo matchup. I think it was a flyer to test moving the conference championship games to a neutral site to see what the response might be. It is a moot point here, however.

Because the NFL feels bad for Atlanta because they’ll likely never make it to another championship game.

Cincy was clearly the better team even in that short amount of time they played. And that was confirmed yesterday. Amazing some mush brains are still trying to defend the N.F.L. and give Buffalo the benefit of the doubt.