- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:25 pm to kingbob
quote:
I hated lugging groceries the 7 blocks from Rouses back to my apartment.
We spend like $300 at the grocery store most of the time. That would be problematic unless I was pulling a Radio Flyer wagon with me
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:28 pm to trussthetruzz
quote:
In no way is BR a “walkable city.” The thought is actually comical. Everything is way too spread out, unsafe areas, and the weather is trash
I am remembering those scenes in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles where Steve Martin has to walk back to the rental car place. That is my mental picture of walking around Baton Rouge.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:34 pm to Smeg
quote:
Jesus, are you just a bunch of broke arse baristas that are jealous you can't afford a vehicle?
lmao. I'd bet I'm wealthier than you, fat boy.
Most Americans don't have $400 saved up and would benefit from not having money pits known as cars.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:34 pm to USMEagles
There’s a couple areas that are sorta walkable: Downtown (including spanish and Beauregard town), mid city (particularly along government from S. Eugene to Jefferson Highway), and the areas immediately bordering LSU’s campus to the overpass area.
Most of BR is simply far too spread out to be walkable. They seem to be doing some fairly smart development to connect these different denser areas to create a walkable core in BR. The developments along Nicholson, Highland, Government, and in Downtown East all seem to be geared at increasing population density and connecting downtown to more desirable neighborhoods so it feels less isolated.
All of BR would benefit from reducing parking minimums, improving street connectivity, and restoring some semblance of a street grid to south BR, but creating a successful, safe, walkable, and denseish urban core that incompases LSU, Downtown, lakeview, the overpass area, the garden district, downtown east, and much of mid city would be a massive boon to BR.
Most of BR is simply far too spread out to be walkable. They seem to be doing some fairly smart development to connect these different denser areas to create a walkable core in BR. The developments along Nicholson, Highland, Government, and in Downtown East all seem to be geared at increasing population density and connecting downtown to more desirable neighborhoods so it feels less isolated.
All of BR would benefit from reducing parking minimums, improving street connectivity, and restoring some semblance of a street grid to south BR, but creating a successful, safe, walkable, and denseish urban core that incompases LSU, Downtown, lakeview, the overpass area, the garden district, downtown east, and much of mid city would be a massive boon to BR.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:39 pm to Smeg
quote:
What's funny is the "walkable cities" people are the same ones that hate chain stores, restaurants, etc... but if everything had to be within walking distance for people without vehicles, then there would have to be even MORE of those places.
Dude. This is a dumb fricking take
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:49 pm to Mufassa
No one hates on chains that are actually good. McDonalds makes a shitty burger. Freddy’s makes good food. Applebees is garbage. Zea’s is really solid. No one hates on Cracker Barrel or Jersey Mike’s because they consistently put out a good product. People might hate on their service, wait, or politics, but no one has a bad thing to say about the food at Popeyes or Chik-fil-a.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:54 pm to Smeg
quote:
Not their body / their choice?
Honestly fat people should be exterminated. Disgusting “people”
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:30 pm to kingbob
Somehow this has turned into a car vs. no car thread. Even with the best "smart growth" imaginable most people of means will still own cars. But cities/towns should: 1) have areas with a development pattern where people who choose not to drive, or can't drive (senior citizens, people with disabilities, etc.) have choices other than using a car to make local trips, 2) eliminate draconian zoning and regulation that requires needless parking, and in many cases car storage, 3) develop public rights-of-ways that are safe for all user, whether walking, biking, taking transit or driving.
We have numerous friends that are a one-car households now, especially since COVID and more work from home. Have paid-off cars so no note right now, but we would go one car before ever having 2 car notes again living in the city. Doing the math at an unreasonably low $500/month (car note plus LA insurance), but in reality, probably 6 or 7 hundred a month after gas, maintenance, etc. I could uber/lyft/bike/transit a ton each month and not come close to spending that much, while only using the car when no one else in the house needs it.
Two caveats, obviously doesn't work in rural areas, and we pay a good house note to live in an area where this is possible.
We have numerous friends that are a one-car households now, especially since COVID and more work from home. Have paid-off cars so no note right now, but we would go one car before ever having 2 car notes again living in the city. Doing the math at an unreasonably low $500/month (car note plus LA insurance), but in reality, probably 6 or 7 hundred a month after gas, maintenance, etc. I could uber/lyft/bike/transit a ton each month and not come close to spending that much, while only using the car when no one else in the house needs it.
Two caveats, obviously doesn't work in rural areas, and we pay a good house note to live in an area where this is possible.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:39 pm to NOLALGD
quote:
Somehow this has turned into a car vs. no car thread. Even with the best "smart growth" imaginable most people of means will still own cars. But cities/towns should: 1) have areas with a development pattern where people who choose not to drive, or can't drive (senior citizens, people with disabilities, etc.) have choices other than using a car to make local trips, 2) eliminate draconian zoning and regulation that requires needless parking, and in many cases car storage, 3) develop public rights-of-ways that are safe for all user, whether walking, biking, taking transit or driving.
Based. Most American cities are only designed for cars and are not planned to allow for other modes of transportation.
Get rid of parking minimums and stupid zoning laws and the rest will hopefully sort itself out.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:42 pm to jclem11
quote:
lmao. I'd bet I'm wealthier than you, fat boy.
Most Americans don't have $400 saved up and would benefit from not having money pits known as cars.
You think you're doing well because you rent a studio apartment and ride a Huffy bike. Realize that other people own their own homes and multiple vehicles.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:46 pm to Smeg
quote:
You think you're doing well because you rent a studio apartment and ride a Huffy bike. Realize that other people own their own homes and multiple vehicles.
Keep projecting, baw.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:54 pm to Smeg
I would want:
1) To live within 12 blocks of everything I ever did
2) on 5 acres with some form of water that isn’t a self-contained/stocked pond
And not in that order.
1) To live within 12 blocks of everything I ever did
2) on 5 acres with some form of water that isn’t a self-contained/stocked pond
And not in that order.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:57 pm to Smeg
Id rather them not be shitholes
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:58 pm to Smeg
quote:
Would you rather walk through New Orleans and Baton Rouge or would you rather drive through those cities?
Having lived downtown in Nola in a fully walkable setup - I loved it.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 7:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You can have walkable neighborhoods, not entire cities.
I agree. The essential characteristic of a truly walkable area/neighborhood is safety. For example, my daughter (no pics) lives in the Midtown area of Starkville. She can walk to campus, the Cotton District, church, and the downtown area from her apartment. There are several restaurants and shops in her area, and the restaurants are mostly dog-friendly. She loves it. She often takes her dog for a walk, sees several friends along the way, and can then sit on the patio of a local restaurant or coffee shop with her friends and her dog and just catch-up and people watch. It’s a great area that fosters a real sense of community. However, a low crime rate is necessary to have the walkable areas. She takes reasonable precautions and maintains situational awareness, but if the area were dangerous, people wouldn’t be out walking like they do.
Also, she still must drive to get to grocery stores and such. It isn’t totally walkable, but it is far more walkable than most areas.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 7:11 pm to Smeg
quote:
his "walkable cities" thing I keep hearing about...
Would you rather walk through New Orleans and Baton Rouge or would you rather drive through those cities?
Depends on the car I'm driving. Safety first.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 7:26 pm to sabanisarustedspoke
Austin between 51st street and Oltorf is very walkable
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News