- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Twitter Files: Biden election suppression - “1A not absolute”- Suppl. Update today p39
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:12 pm to fightin tigers
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:12 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Confident that what, a private company working to censor you isn't a violation of the constitution/BoR?.
You would agree that a government actor coercing a private actor into government-sponsored action would fall under that umbrella, wouldn’t you?
2
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:13 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
You’re very much upset about this
Why would he be upset about this? He tells us constantly that national politics don't matter and that he is a centrist.
Seems like this would be the wet dream of someone who fits that description.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:15 pm to Tyga Woods
yeah your wife told me
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:15 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Big tech censoring your speech is literally not a 1st amendment violation, even in collusion with the feds.
I know, it sucks, but literally not a violation if it is collusion.
Is this what you are going with now? You have been through several.
Trying to see what sticks? Which one sounds best?
I'll give ya hint. None, they are all stupid as frick.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:15 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Big tech censoring your speech is literally not a 1st amendment violation
Correct.
quote:
even in collusion with the feds.
Incorrect.
This would be the equivalent of the NYT not printing an op Ed because the white house doesn’t like the opinions.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:16 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Did you come up with hard numbers? Because right now Fox News outdoes CNN and MSNBC combined in primete viewrship.....by your numbers.
so 2 v 1 and they are already even..... and you have already admitted that there are several more leftist news entities to go....
are you under the assumption that the remaining left news entities draw no viewership or, better yet, somehow have negative viewership?
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:16 pm to stout
Are you speaking to me?
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:16 pm to Proximo
Coercing? Forcing? Sure.
Nothing I have seen indicates that.
I equated it to Trump leaning on his people at Fox News to 'coerce' and 'force' certain storylines.
Is it right/wrong is for the individual to decide. To think that Twitter and Obama/Biden are the first to play that hand...c'mon.
Just politics. frick, Trump called out media personalities knowing he would appear on their newscasts the next night.
Can't do anything but appreciate that kind of transparency.
Nothing I have seen indicates that.
I equated it to Trump leaning on his people at Fox News to 'coerce' and 'force' certain storylines.
Is it right/wrong is for the individual to decide. To think that Twitter and Obama/Biden are the first to play that hand...c'mon.
Just politics. frick, Trump called out media personalities knowing he would appear on their newscasts the next night.
Can't do anything but appreciate that kind of transparency.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:17 pm to Tyga Woods
yeah your wife told me
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:18 pm to Klark Kent
Are white liberals obviously upset but trying to act like none of this is a big deal?
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:19 pm to beerJeep
quote:
so 2 v 1 and they are already even..... and you have already admitted that there are several more leftist news entities to go....
Yeah, what are the numbers for NBC/ABC/CBS primetime political op eds?
Seems an easy number to produce since they have zero market. Like I said, leaving out murder mysteries and news magazines.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:19 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Coercing? Forcing? Sure.
Nothing I have seen indicates that
Ok man, we get it.
You are FOR government removing and silencing speech of their people.
Cool, great hill to die on. Congrats, you should be proud.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:19 pm to Proximo
quote:
You would agree that a government actor coercing a private actor into government-sponsored action
I want to see the communications from Government to Twitter stating for actions to be blocked.
I don't really care about Twitter to DNC, that was a known fact.
I want proof of government intervention or the least, Biden campaign demanding censorship.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:20 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Yeah, what are the numbers for NBC/ABC/CBS primetime political op eds?
Use that fancy google machine and learn something on your own for once.
Muh boooffffff sideeezzzzz
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:21 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:
You are FOR government removing and silencing speech of their people.
100% not.
And you are projecting because you came to a sudden reality.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:21 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Use that fancy google machine and learn something on your own for once.
How I figured out they have 0% market share.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:23 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
How I figured out they have 0% market share.
It really is sad that you are willing to die on this hill of ignorance.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:23 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
I want proof of government intervention or the least, Biden campaign demanding censorship
bullshite. You and you ilk would move the goalposts and claim it no big deal somehow.
Besides I bet the specifics are going to come out in some hearings in the not so distant future.
I don't blame them for not posting names at this point.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:23 pm to beerJeep
If it such an easy google then you should be able to provide the number.
But, you did google, and you found out your mouth overloaded your arse.
60 minutes is the closest they get to prime time op eds. And that doesn't fit the critera.
But, you did google, and you found out your mouth overloaded your arse.
60 minutes is the closest they get to prime time op eds. And that doesn't fit the critera.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:24 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
I want proof of government intervention or the least, Biden campaign demanding censorship.
Are you saying you would only accept as proof an email or other communication from a fed email address? I mean, yeah, that would be rock solid. But it requires a moron to send something like that through official channels.
Page 20 of 39
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News