- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Garland to name Special Counsel for Trump criminal probe
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:41 pm to BobBoucher
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:41 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
They are saying “if anyone attempted to interfere with the transfer of power or certification of the election”.
UNLAWULLY interfering. Is there a "lawful" way to interfere with it? Where's the distinction drawn? What's the statute for unlawful interference?
1
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:41 pm to The Pirate King
They have to do something because once the house flips in session the the reublicans wanted to investigate what happened on Jan 6th. This way, since it is now under a special counsel they can say that the house is compromising their prove and so they recommend “x” not to appear…
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:42 pm to laxtonto
quote:
They have to do something because once the house flips in session the the reublicans wanted to investigate what happened on Jan 6th. This way, since it is now under a special counsel they can say that the house is compromising their prove and so they recommend “x” not to appear…
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:42 pm to Decatur
quote:
whether any person or entity unlawfully interfered with the transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote
quote:
investigation involving classified documents and other presidential records, as well as the possible obstruction of that investigation
They want it bad!
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:42 pm to bamarep
We know it’s political, so we’ll hire an independent investigator, chosen by us, to make sure it’s okay - dems
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
independent
Is that what mueller was?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:44 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
UNLAWULLY interfering. Is there a "lawful" way to interfere with it? Where's the distinction drawn? What's the statute for unlawful interference?
Yeah - that’s why I’m saying their wording is really loose. I mean, you could make a case that Trumps convo with Pence is interference.
But exploring legal means to pause certification so investigations and cases can make their way through courts shouldn’t be considered unlawful.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:45 pm to BobBoucher
It’s just all about the existence of this “momentous and critical” investigation to begin with. And most significant and important of all to the left, the ultimate goal being their selective leaking strategy, to shape and mold public opinion and perception. Simply all about the selective leaking.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:47 pm to Mephistopheles
quote:
I'm sure trump hasn't broken a law in his life.
Trump is a guy on the up and up. Clean as they come. DOJ won't find a thing on him.
Now do Biden or Obama
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:47 pm to momentoftruth87
this announcement only strengthens my resolve to vote for Trump
bottom line:
Democrats/uniparty's only concern is maintaining POWER. They are not concerned about the country's well-being. Why, after all the shite they have put President Trump & family thru, would he run for President? If you seriously think it's for money or power, you're brain dead
bottom line:
Democrats/uniparty's only concern is maintaining POWER. They are not concerned about the country's well-being. Why, after all the shite they have put President Trump & family thru, would he run for President? If you seriously think it's for money or power, you're brain dead
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:47 pm to BobBoucher
So fricking tired of the DC cesspool.
They are announcing to everyone that deigns to frick with their sandbox that this is what will happen if they step out of line.
I swear if it was wiped from the planet tomorrow I'd be so happy.
They are announcing to everyone that deigns to frick with their sandbox that this is what will happen if they step out of line.
I swear if it was wiped from the planet tomorrow I'd be so happy.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:48 pm to davyjones
quote:
It’s just all about the existence of this “momentous and critical” investigation to begin with. And most significant and important of all to the left, the ultimate goal being their selective leaking strategy, to shape and mold public opinion and perception. Simply all about the selective leaking.
Yeah. That’s what I see as their strategy.
The one wildcard are those Jan 6 cases in the Dem-friendly District of Columbia. If they continue to build momentum with those cases, they may feel confident they can get a Trump conviction there, even on super weak evidence.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:48 pm to Mephistopheles
You jerked off to the Steele Dossier, didn't you?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:50 pm to minister of truth
quote:
this announcement only strengthens my resolve to vote for Trump
This!
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:50 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
The one wildcard are those Jan 6 cases in the Dem-friendly District of Columbia. If they continue to build momentum with those cases, they may feel confident they can get a Trump conviction there, even on super weak evidence
Kinda hope they do.
May very well be the spark that causes patriots to test Biden's F-15s.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:53 pm to Decatur
quote:
whether any person or entity unlawfully interfered with the transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote
Just curious what statutes of law they are specifically looking into. If we are still a nation of laws and not men, what specific statutes are they claiming the sitting POTUS violated? What does "interfering" in transfer of power mean exactly and how specifically is this addressed in the Constitution?
Does the Constitution even matter anymore?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:53 pm to stout
Love the whataboutisms from the right...
"It's okay for Trump to break the law because I think that other people have."
"It's okay for Trump to break the law because I think that other people have."
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:54 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
Yeah. That’s what I see as their strategy.
The one wildcard are those Jan 6 cases in the Dem-friendly District of Columbia. If they continue to build momentum with those cases, they may feel confident they can get a Trump conviction there, even on super weak evidence.
Flip the tables, and every DNC leader, member, sycophant everywhere would be howling from the mountaintops about what an outrage this was the minute it hit the news.
Here, instead:
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:55 pm to bamarep
I trust Isis over this shite government. They can all burn in hell.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News