- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:13 pm to NC_Tigah
You’re right. WTC7 looks considerably better in that picture than the Changsha building.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:17 pm to Jayrod79
I’m sure it was just coincidence!
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:26 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Doesn't even need to be a whole floor. A couple of columns will do. Test it yourself. Stand on a coke can. Have a friend pluck it. Does it fall over at the bottom sideways? Nope. it crushes vertically.
I don't believe the towers fell because of a demolition but this is absolutely not true. Pressure from the top will push in a weakened surface and it will collapse to that side.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:29 pm to jonnyanony
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:31 pm to CPTDCKHD
quote:
Two planes. Three buildings.
Well I’d say you failed to claim any credibility with such a dullard summary.
You may exit the conversation.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:34 pm to 19
quote:
Especially when you factor in Rumsfeld's admission that "Trillions of dollars in transactions are unaccounted for" ...on 9/10/2001.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:51 pm to mytigger
quote:
The building was supporting no more weight than before impact, if anything less weight because of the fire.
Before you go any further, take a look at an actual construction photo:
How vulnerable do you think those supports are if a floor above it lost it’s structural support due to weakened steel?
Now let’s take a closer look at a photo after the planes hit:
Seems like collapse of one or more floors is imminent, no?
Once a single floor collapses, what do you think would prevent the pancaking effect that was captured in video?
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:55 pm to Willie Stroker
Looks like this thread got anchored.
If any of you kooks want to keep the conversation going despite admins thinking this topic should disappear from the first page, feel free to reply.
I’ll check back to participate if anyone else has the stamina.
If any of you kooks want to keep the conversation going despite admins thinking this topic should disappear from the first page, feel free to reply.
I’ll check back to participate if anyone else has the stamina.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:45 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Do you think they would have fallen over from the bottom, like a sawn tree?
Nope.
Something to consider- is the top of a skyscraper always centered over it's footprint?
Never mind that
A lot of people just can't accept just how perfect those fires burned.
Same intensity throughout the fire. This caused the steel skeleton to expand and contract at the same exact rates throughout the fire. This perfection allowed the skyscrapers to maintain the integrity of their center of gravity once the collapse started and then throughout the collapse.
It was perfect 3 times.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 8:26 am to michael corleone
So you are telling me that the building collapsed on its own footprint via the heat? You truly are an idiot. I have been watching controlled demolitions of buildings and stadiums for years. The fact that the both buildings collapsed on their own footprint is more than enough to justify the idea of a controlled demolition.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 11:08 am to Hognutz
quote:It does? It didn't to me.
Well, lets see, it looks like a textbook controlled demolition to me. Your turn.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 11:09 am
Posted on 9/29/22 at 11:12 am to APHA
quote:FIFY
Three buildings not two, Building 7 fell also on cue with no reason given that I choose to believe even though I have no experience on this topic and we'd never seen this scenario play out before.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 1:42 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
I’ve lurked here for a long time and I agree with a lot of what you all say but the fact that anyone still buys the governments story about what happened on 9/11 is insane. Whether you buy that the planes alone brought down the towers is not even relevant. It was not the work of some middle eastern cavemen. The government attacked us that day. It was an inside job. As some have pointed out 3 buildings fell into their footprints even though only two were allegedly hit by planes
How anyone can still believe tofficial 9/11 story after living through the scamdemic is ridiculous. Two false flag attacks 20 years apart to take all of your freedom away. The patriot act is now being used to do what it was designed for: come after patriots
How anyone can still believe tofficial 9/11 story after living through the scamdemic is ridiculous. Two false flag attacks 20 years apart to take all of your freedom away. The patriot act is now being used to do what it was designed for: come after patriots
Posted on 9/29/22 at 1:43 pm to JulesWinfield88
The only conspiracy regarding 9/11 is the lie that we were told. Do I know exactly what happened? Of course not. But I know their story is a bald faced lie. And I know how it’s been used and abused with the tsa and the patriot act to have you live in a virtual police state. Which is why I know the government had a hand in it if they didn’t outright plan it
Some of you need to seriously open your eyes as to what this government is. Get out of the mindset of oh they would never do that. And if you still have some misplaced loyalty to the bush administration and that’s why you don’t want to believe it then you’re just a fool. Every one of those people belongs in jail for lying us into war
Some of you need to seriously open your eyes as to what this government is. Get out of the mindset of oh they would never do that. And if you still have some misplaced loyalty to the bush administration and that’s why you don’t want to believe it then you’re just a fool. Every one of those people belongs in jail for lying us into war
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 2:05 pm to southerngent1417
quote:Worse magnitude, we sure about that?
Crazy this just happened to a building in Changsha, China except on a much worse magnitude and the building is still standing.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 2:11 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:All of the Fire Department was in on the conspiracy, man!!
Virtually all the firemen working near WTC 7 claimed that it was going to collapse because of fire and the structural damage.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 2:19 pm to JulesWinfield88
quote:To make sure I understand you, you think the government mandated a plane to land for some mysterious reason, then the government killed everyone on that plane, hacking them into pieces, then also crashed the plane, then took all those body parts and pieces of the plane and transported them to the Pentagon and strategically placed the body parts and the plane parts around...is that the argument you're going for with this conspiracy?
I’ve lurked here for a long time and I agree with a lot of what you all say but the fact that anyone still buys the governments story about what happened on 9/11 is insane. Whether you buy that the planes alone brought down the towers is not even relevant. It was not the work of some middle eastern cavemen. The government attacked us that day. It was an inside job. As some have pointed out 3 buildings fell into their footprints even though only two were allegedly hit by planes
How anyone can still believe tofficial 9/11 story after living through the scamdemic is ridiculous. Two false flag attacks 20 years apart to take all of your freedom away. The patriot act is now being used to do what it was designed for: come after patriots
Posted on 9/29/22 at 9:06 pm to matty3387
quote:
So you are telling me that the building collapsed on its own footprint via the heat? You truly are an idiot. I have been watching controlled demolitions of buildings and stadiums for years. The fact that the both buildings collapsed on their own footprint is more than enough to justify the idea of a controlled demolition.
If you've been watching for years, you're pretty bad at analysis.
The twin towers and WTC7 both collapsed in very different manners that were clear!y different from a controlled demolition.
The only thing they had in common was they all three collapsed in the direction that gravity causes them to.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 9:12 pm to JulesWinfield88
quote:
The government attacked us that day. It was an inside job.
And who wouldn't be enamored with the overwhelming evidence you were unable to cite. Very compelling.
quote:
As some have pointed out 3 buildings fell into their footprints even though only two were allegedly hit by planes
Relevance? Why would all 3 need to be hit by planes?
quote:
How anyone can still believe tofficial 9/11 story after living through the scamdemic is ridiculous. Two false flag attacks 20 years apart to take all of your freedom away. The patriot act is now being used to do what it was designed for: come after patriots
You apparently have an inflated view of the intelligence of politicians and government bureaucrats.
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News