- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can any of the boards liberals explain this to me?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:35 am
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:35 am
So.....trump wants to direct an investigation into his political rival's son who's a private citizen=bad.
Biden's justice department investigating a private citizen who's going to be his political rival=no big deal and actually encouraging?
Biden's justice department investigating a private citizen who's going to be his political rival=no big deal and actually encouraging?
11
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:36 am to RoosterCogburn585
That's (D)ifferent.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:39 am to RoosterCogburn585
Trump merely requesting the cooperation of Ukraine in the investigation of the company Hunter was working for was impeachable election interference.
But 8 federal investigations later, raiding MAL and seizing passports and lingerie from the presumptive nominees home, Democrats are swearing that its different this time.
But 8 federal investigations later, raiding MAL and seizing passports and lingerie from the presumptive nominees home, Democrats are swearing that its different this time.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:45 am to RoosterCogburn585
I presume I'm a board liberal.
1. hunter biden is a relative of the potus.
2. trump is the former president.
one is the actual.
one isn't.
I don't care about hunter.
if he's guilty your jury can say so. idngaf.
btw the former president decided to try to keep power after he lost.
that's the single worst case in us history.
sometimes whataboutism is not a great look.
1. hunter biden is a relative of the potus.
2. trump is the former president.
one is the actual.
one isn't.
I don't care about hunter.
if he's guilty your jury can say so. idngaf.
btw the former president decided to try to keep power after he lost.
that's the single worst case in us history.
sometimes whataboutism is not a great look.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:46 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Trump merely requesting the cooperation of Ukraine in the investigation of the company Hunter was working for was impeachable election interference.
That’s a bit disingenuous. It wasn’t merely just asking for cooperation. Dems were hung up that he delayed congress approved funds in exchange for cooperation. Quid pro quo.
If he just asked, they would have bitched more than likely but couldn’t have impeached him.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:46 am to CelticDog
quote:
btw the former president decided to try to keep power after he lost.
How?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:47 am to CelticDog
quote:
I presume I'm a board liberal.
Wrong.
You are a goose-stepping leftist.
There is a BIG difference.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:48 am to CelticDog
You could have saved time typing that out and just said “that’s (D)ifferent”
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 6:49 am
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:48 am to UASports23
quote:
he delayed congress approved funds in exchange for cooperation. Quid pro quo.
Who is being disingenuous?
But if you want to be persnickety, Biden did that too. Very publicly. Was it only a problem when democrats imagined Trump doing it?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:49 am to CelticDog
quote:
I presume I'm a board liberal. 1. hunter biden is a relative of the potus. 2. trump is the former president. one is the actual. one isn't. I don't care about hunter. if he's guilty your jury can say so. idngaf. btw the former president decided to try to keep power after he lost. that's the single worst case in us history. sometimes whataboutism is not a great look.
What? Can you try again?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:49 am to CelticDog
You a blithering idiot.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:51 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
But if you want to be persnickety, Biden did that too. Very publicly. Was it only a problem when democrats imagined Trump doing it?
Yes VP Biden publicly stated that he gave an ultimatum. No one is saying otherwise nor is that part of the conversation.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:53 am to mmonro3
I have to ask this as well. Explain to me in detail with actual facts on how exactly he tried to keep power after he lost...
I feel like this new "whataboutism" argument is the new "debunked" arguing strategy for liberals.
I feel like this new "whataboutism" argument is the new "debunked" arguing strategy for liberals.
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 6:55 am
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:54 am to UASports23
Awesome. Now for step 2.
Show us where Trump engaged in a QPQ, and defeated dems scrambling to salvage the narrative by accusing the administration of altering call transcripts doesn’t count.
Show us where Trump engaged in a QPQ, and defeated dems scrambling to salvage the narrative by accusing the administration of altering call transcripts doesn’t count.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:54 am to mmonro3
quote:
btw the former president decided to try to keep power after he lost.
How?
watch the Jan 6 committee hearings.
his staff and legal team were witnesses.
you will see how.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:55 am to CelticDog
quote:
1. hunter biden is a relative of the potus.
That included his dad in his illegal business deals with foreign adversaries.
Joe is now compromised by china, ukraine, among others.
That is a HUGE deal
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:55 am to CelticDog
quote:
1. hunter biden is a relative of the potus.
quote:
one is the actual.
That's not actually the point (despite the focus on Don Jr. during the Trump administration). The point is that Hunter's data contains more than enough evidence for at least an investigation into Joe actively using his office as VP to enrich himself and his family and possibly committing pedophilic crimes.
This potential evidence has been in the hands of the DOJ for years (in the laptop) and not only did they not investigate it, but when news of it broke they claimed it was Russian disinformation.
This is the same DOJ which actively pursued the Steele Dossier as fact (ie: without researching it) while also knowing it had come directly from the Clinton campaign. This is also the same DOJ which lied on FISA warrants and barely slapped the hands of those who did so.
In other words, try again.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:55 am to RoosterCogburn585
The raid was not about getting dirt on Trump, it was to take back the dirt that Trump had on the Swamp.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:55 am to CelticDog
How about you just tell us, since its so clear...
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:56 am to CelticDog
Witnesses to what?
Be specific.
Be specific.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News