- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/4/22 at 11:28 am to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony.
You are so damn stupid!
So they just barge into the hearing and get under oath?
You think these arse clowns are going to allow anyone to tell a different story?
It is amazing that people like you can make it through a day because your brain obviously does not work. Idiot.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 11:28 am to texridder
quote:
Where did you get that crap from? Trump was the one who prevented potential witnesses from testifying.
yep. And Hillary didn’t fund the Steele dossier which was totally legit. And the woods procedures were followed and the fisa apps were totally legit. And trump is a Russian asset. You believe all of the dumb shite being spoon fed to you. And you lie about being a lawyer. It’s a sad pathetic life, but it’s yours.
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 11:29 am
Posted on 7/4/22 at 12:29 pm to DotBling
quote:
I am so damn stupid! It is amazing that people like me can make it through a day because my brain obviously does not work. I am an Idiot.
Nailed it.
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 7/4/22 at 12:32 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Hey Clark, don’t ya wish you could go back in time right before you hit the submit button on your dumbass post?
Posted on 7/4/22 at 12:34 pm to Clark14
quote:
Nailed it.
Are you really doubling down after getting destroyed in this thread?
Posted on 7/4/22 at 1:15 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Hey Clark, don’t ya wish you could go back in time right before you hit the submit button on your post that doesn’t follow our brain washed thought patterns?
Had I known the thread would be moved to this board I wouldn’t have posted. There is only one way of thinking here and any post that doesn’t follow the programmed thought process is viewed as an attack.
The hatred here is disturbing.
When this thread runs it’s course I’ll not purposely return.
In the mean time have fun dog piling….
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 7/4/22 at 1:32 pm to Clark14
quote:
Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Was it painful when you tied yourself into this knot? Her hearsay...er...."testimony"... is garbage and is anything but credible.
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 7/4/22 at 1:36 pm to Catahoula20LSU
quote:
...for all you in Rio Linda, as Rush would say. Her entire testimony was hearsay.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 1:58 pm to KosmoCramer
It's for show. In areal trial, she could testify but the cross x would be brutal unless you had hearsay that matched from unrelated persons....meaning someone who does not know Hutchinson nor would have worked with her.
My bet is that Trump probably did not go over the top, but he certainly carried on like a Tennessee Tobacco farmer in 2000.
My bet is that Trump probably did not go over the top, but he certainly carried on like a Tennessee Tobacco farmer in 2000.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:12 pm to Clark14
You’re a brainiac aren’t you? Nancy and her shift show would never call the SS that was actually in the SUV… the point is to smear a past president that has made them absolutely nuts… the SS stood up and said that’s not true and if called they would testify under oath… All she said was (something to the effect of) lmao.. so to not be as liable..
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:20 pm to Clark14
quote:
Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
OMG. Tell me you have the IQ of a carrot without telling me you have the IQ of a carrot.
Her testimony, by definition, was hearsay.
Hutchinson said she was NOT a witness to what she testified to, rather she heard it from someone.
THAT is hearsay.
If this is how you are validating your hatred, then we know you’re just not a serious person.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:29 pm to LafTiger
I don’t care if Trump shot his secret service members - at that money he had every right to do so. Plus when you are the greatest president you can do what ever you want - after what he endured for us laws don’t apply to him.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 5:20 pm to Clark14
I've read many of your post on here. You are a shite stain.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 10:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And trump is a Russian asset. You believe all of the dumb shite being spoon fed to you. And you lie about being a lawyer. It’s a sad pathetic life, but it’s yours.
I never said i thought Trump was a Russian asset. I believe that Trump and his campaign coordinated with Russia in Russia’s efforts to influence the election on behalf of Trump.
I dont believe all the shite that you think is being fed to me. I do my own research and try to read the actual source documents. And when I post this research on here I dont get discussion, I get sophomoric personal insults.
I don't have to lie about being a lawyer because I am one. And the fact you couldn’t figure that out points straight to you as being the one who is pathetic
Posted on 7/4/22 at 11:05 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Her whole testimony was "I was told to the effect of.... Trump lunged at somebody"
The whole "to the effect of" means that anything she said after "to the effect of" was completely inaccurate.
IF she is going to repeat hearsay, she should say, "I was told, if fact, Trump lunged at someone."
She should only be stating exactly what she was told. she did not even do that.
Since everything was said "to the effect of" no one can conclude what was really said.
It is sad our political leaders accepted such garbage as "credible" testimony. What is worse is that the MSM reported it.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 11:21 pm to texridder
quote:
I never said i thought Trump was a Russian asset. I believe that Trump and his campaign coordinated with Russia in Russia’s efforts to influence the election on behalf of Trump.
How dense can you possibly be? It must feel weird to be dumber than a potato.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 11:27 pm to Clark14
quote:
Clark14
Here’s one of those subhuman cockroaches right here
Posted on 7/5/22 at 6:50 am to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony
No one will call on anyone that wants to dispute her testimony.
There are a number of people who have already volunteered.
This entire production is a farce.
Posted on 7/5/22 at 6:57 am to hashtag
quote:
she never gave a testimony because she wasn't there. Every word she uttered was hearsay
And she was sure to frame it as such, with every sentence.
I don't know what they had on her, but it seems apparent to me that she was coerced, and she left beaucoup breadcrumbs to basically scream it out loud.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News