- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I keep hearing the leaker is in deep trouble. What’s the liability for Politico leaking it
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:16 pm
I never heard anyone yet blame politico for leaking the news?
12
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:17 pm to Revelator
Zero
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:17 pm to Revelator
And why Politico?
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:18 pm to Revelator
I hate Politico but the government cannot go after the media. First Amendment protects them. They broke no laws publishing it.
This post was edited on 5/3/22 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:18 pm to loogaroo
quote:
And why Politico?
They broke the news
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:19 pm to Revelator
Im not sure its exactly illegal to leak a Supreme Court draft
Then again the Supreme Court can make it illegal
So
Who knows
Then again the Supreme Court can make it illegal
So
Who knows
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:20 pm to Henry Jones Jr
They broke no law because the court previously held under 1970s case law there is no reason for a publication ban on leaked material.
But if we are revisiting 50+ year old cases here that one may come up soon too.
But if we are revisiting 50+ year old cases here that one may come up soon too.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:21 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Get out of here with laws and logic. Let’s extradite Julian Assange and sentence him to death!
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:21 pm to Caraway Rye
Nothing really can be done criminally about leaking the document, however when he or she lies or there is evidence they tried to cover their tracks then deep shite for that person.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:21 pm to Revelator
quote:
I never heard anyone yet blame politico for leaking the news?
These opinions that are always shared through the court have strict rules about how they are distributed.
Someone deep in the Supreme Court leaked this.
This wasn't an accident.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:22 pm to teke184
quote:
They broke no law because the court previously held under 1970s case law there is no reason for a publication ban on leaked material.
That’s why I asked the question. I didn’t know if their act was illegal
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:23 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
I hate Politico but the government cannot go after the media. First Amendment protects them. They broke no laws publishing it.
Unless your name is Julian Assange.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:24 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Nothing really can be done criminally about leaking the document, however when he or she lies or there is evidence they tried to cover their tracks then deep shite for that person.
The supreme court can make it illegal
They can retroactively make it illegal
They can basically do whatever they want
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:24 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
I hate Politico but the government cannot go after the media. First Amendment protects them. They broke no laws publishing it.
LOL. Govt has shite all over the first amendment, repeatedly.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:24 pm to Revelator
The Pentagon Papers case from the Nixon era held that the NYT couldn’t be held liable for publishing the papers even though Daniel Ellsberg was not authorized to distribute them.
They also held that the government couldn’t put prior restraint on the NYT to prevent them from publishing them.
They also held that the government couldn’t put prior restraint on the NYT to prevent them from publishing them.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:26 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:So just keep it going because it’s “their turn to suffer”?
LOL. Govt has shite all over the first amendment, repeatedly
That’s an emotional decision and it has no place in civilized discussions when it comes to government
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:28 pm to Revelator
If the SC leak was something that Dims could use against the R’s there would already be an investigation scheduled.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:29 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
LOL. Govt has shite all over the first amendment, repeatedly So just keep it going because it’s “their turn to suffer”? That’s an emotional decision and it has no place in civilized discussions when it comes to government
I didn’t say they should. The person I replied to said they can’t. The federal govt can do whatever it wants, if this isn’t clear to someone after the last 100+ years then it won’t ever be until it is their rights that are directly violated.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:29 pm to Caraway Rye
quote:Do what now?
Then again the Supreme Court can make it illegal
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:29 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
I hate Politico but the government cannot go after the media. First Amendment protects them. They broke no laws publishing it.
Unless it is Project Veritas.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News