- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dirty little b.i.t.c.h. Chris Paul assessed flagrant 1
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:51 pm
9
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:53 pm to whatiknowsofar
"oops" on all the posters in the "will anything happen to Chris Paul" thread 
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:53 pm to whatiknowsofar
threw and elbow then tossed a kick. cp needs to be punched square in the mouf.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:56 pm to whatiknowsofar
clearly an accident, muscle spasm, should be a foul on that dirty player Jose for even looking at Pawl
Posted on 4/28/22 at 1:57 pm to MrJimBeam
Doesn't this mean if CP3 commits any flagrant fouls this game, he will be suspended for game 7?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:01 pm to Procrastinator
quote:No, he has 2 points now.
Doesn't this mean if CP3 commits any flagrant fouls this game, he will be suspended for game 7?
It has to 4 points
So if he commits a flagrant 2 and gets ejected tonight then yes he'd be suspended for game 7.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:02 pm to shel311
quote:
"oops" on all the posters in the "will anything happen to Chris Paul" thread
Well, there is still 1 more flagrant they've refused to assess on Paul
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:05 pm to shel311
quote:
No, he has 2 points now.
It has to 4 points
So if he commits a flagrant 2 and gets ejected tonight then yes he'd be suspended for game 7.
Ah my mistake. I thought it was 3 points.
So we need Herb/Jose to piss him off enough for a flagrant 2. Although, the first flagrant CP3 committed could've been a flagrant 2.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:07 pm to Procrastinator
quote:The rule is worded oddly. It says you must exceed 3 points, which onthe surface is saying you need 4 but I don't get why it doesn't just say 4 points then.
Ah my mistake. I thought it was 3 points.
Also, the Suns fans have whined for 6 games how about how dirty the Pels are, and they now have twice as many flagrants as we do.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:08 pm to shel311
quote:
It says you must exceed 3 points, which onthe surface is saying you need 4 but I don't get why it doesn't just say 4 points then.
b/c you can theoretically get to 5 points
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:10 pm to shel311
quote:
No, he has 2 points now.
It has to 4 points
So if he commits a flagrant 2 and gets ejected tonight then yes he'd be suspended for game 7.
What was the first flagrant? The karate chop on Herb?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:11 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Yup.
The NBA refused to give him a (deserved) flagrant for the push on Herb just before Herb pushed CP3 (...and got a flagrant)
The NBA refused to give him a (deserved) flagrant for the push on Herb just before Herb pushed CP3 (...and got a flagrant)
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
I am still amazed they didn't call Jose for a foul for being close enough for Paul to kick him on the shot
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:15 pm to whatiknowsofar
like i said about the swipe at Herb face, if Draymond had done that, he'd get ejected, and same goes for this kick to the nuts.
There was nothing about that play that was a normal basketball move, and he without a doubt intended to kick him. Why they didn't review that in the game and kick his arse out is ridiculous.
There was nothing about that play that was a normal basketball move, and he without a doubt intended to kick him. Why they didn't review that in the game and kick his arse out is ridiculous.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:16 pm to whatiknowsofar
Seems like kicking someone in the balls would be a flagrant 2 if it's called live in the game. Unnecessary and excessive contact. Why was only a flagrant 1 retroactively assessed?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:22 pm to medtiger
quote:
Why was only a flagrant 1 retroactively assessed?
probably b/c if they gave him a F2, he wouldn't be able to play today, and they aren't going to do that to the "good guy" CP3.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:26 pm to medtiger
Not sure how it is not a flagrant 2. It is certainly not a basketball move and is excessive with intent.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:26 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
probably b/c if they gave him a F2, he wouldn't be able to play today, and they aren't going to do that to the "good guy" CP3.
That’s not correct. He’d still be able to play today if it had been called a flagrant 2.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:32 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
Not sure how it is not a flagrant 2. It is certainly not a basketball move and is excessive with intent.
It has to be "unnecessary" and "excessive" for a flagrant 2. Just unnecessary is a 1.
So I guess a kick to the balls isn't excessive
Posted on 4/28/22 at 2:36 pm to TotesMcGotes
But then should have been ejected in game 5 and the league does not want that fire storm. I do think CP3 will get assessed an early foul or 2 though.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News