Started By
Message

re: USA Today names "Women of the Year"

Posted on 3/16/22 at 10:27 am to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67159 posts
Posted on 3/16/22 at 10:27 am to
No I disagree with the posters.

I think there are way to many hateful and bigoted people posting.

And I’ll say in 2009 it didn’t seem this bad.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22562 posts
Posted on 3/16/22 at 10:37 am to
quote:

No I disagree with the posters.

On the topic? About a biological man being picked as candidate for Women of the Year?

quote:

And I’ll say in 2009 it didn’t seem this bad.

That wasn’t my point with the 2009 comment. My point was you’ve been here long enough to know what to except yet point out something as if it’s some new revelation.
Posted by midnight_chopper
Member since Mar 2018
654 posts
Posted on 3/16/22 at 10:44 am to
quote:

And I’ll say in 2009 it didn’t seem this bad.


In 2009 we also didn’t have trans-women swimmers competing against natural women. When shite gets absurd don’t be surprised when people respond in kind.
Posted by Glorious
Mobile
Member since Aug 2014
24588 posts
Posted on 3/16/22 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

And I’ll say in 2009 it didn’t seem this bad.



In 2009, you would have been laughed out of even the DNC for suggesting that trans-women are actually women or that there are more than 2 genders. It's not our fault that in a matter of years, this issue became radicalized
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram