- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:38 pm to Chromdome35
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:38 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Russia is clearly the aggressor here
Who said otherwise?
This is a gigantic laundering operation that has yielded tens of billions in untethered money.
I feel for the innocent people of Ukraine (as opposed to those perpetrating acts of ethnic cleansing). They are truly the victims here.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:39 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Who said otherwise?
That appears to be what the other guy is driving at.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:39 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:so true. what the bidens and clintons are doing to the people of ukraine is despicable. i am with you. hopefully putin prevails and cleans it all up
This is a gigantic laundering operation that has yielded tens of billions in untethered money.
I feel for the innocent people of Ukraine (as opposed to those perpetrating acts of ethnic cleansing). They are truly the victims here.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:41 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Only this didn’t happen by in large. frick Putin.
Leftists, on the other hand, call anyone not blowing Zalenskyy a Putin fanboy.
I’m against being robbed by Ukraine.
This isn’t difficult.
The largest portion of money going to fund Ukraine is actually money being spent to replenish the equipment and material the U.S. military is sending to Ukraine. You think the Russian military is getting smashed through mean thoughts? No, its U.S. and European arms that are hollowing out the Russian military.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:41 pm to Chromdome35
Exactly, now that they’re accepted into NATO, they do have nukes by proxy
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:42 pm to MorgusTheMagnificent
Ukraine isn't in NATO WTF are you talking about?
And if NATO accepts them now... it's only because dumbass Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine definitely wasn't in NATO before this started, or again are you privy to some big state secrets that no one but you and Putin know about?
And if NATO accepts them now... it's only because dumbass Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine definitely wasn't in NATO before this started, or again are you privy to some big state secrets that no one but you and Putin know about?
This post was edited on 9/11/22 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:44 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
To my knowledge, there was no NATO buildup in Ukraine
They were going to be members. My take, Putin was either using it as an excuse, was truly concerned with the ice cream eater being installed, or both (this is what I believe). As I have stated before, if China was cozying up to Mexico or Canada with a treaty aligning militarily with the CCP against the USA, then it would be go time. I could give a shite about how we may be viewed. Sadly, with Trudeau slobbing Xi’s knob, this isn’t totally implausible.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to jimmy the leg
So you think the US would invade Mexico or Canada if either became military partners with China?
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to WeeWee
quote:
The political board is melting bigly.
The political board is literally cheering Putin for "finally taking the gloves off" and targeting civilian infrastructure. Which is, of course, a war crime by definition, not that that would bother them.
quote:
I hope Chicken gets that board cleaned up before the 2024 election. I miss the informative debates and the memes. Now it is just retards and memes trying to out retard the other retards there.
Those window lickers have given the management ample incentive to do something about them long before now. I assume the political board is the way it is because somebody wants it that way. The ownership can run the place however they see fit, but I think it's a black mark on an otherwise great site.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to MorgusTheMagnificent
quote:
USA didn’t have a very nice response when nukes were stockpiled at our doorstep. Is it really that unreasonable for Russia to have a negative reaction? Particularly after they were told this wouldn’t happen?
Russia pushed for the removal of Ukraine's nukes. They agreed to respect their boundaries if they gave up their nukes. Russia got what they wanted and neutered Ukraine but then they just started taking what they wanted anyway.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:47 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:there is a 0% chance we would invade mexico or canada if they signed some kind of military treaty with china. zero
, if China was cozying up to Mexico or Canada with a treaty aligning militarily with the CCP against the USA
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:48 pm to Chromdome35
With Biden in charge...he would probably join the CCP and assist in the invasion.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:49 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
there is a 0% chance we would invade mexico or canada if they signed some kind of military treaty with china. zero
Right, because the US would never do that.
Then again...you may be right. Why would the CCP need to sign anything when they have a puppet regime right now.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:50 pm to WeeWee
quote:
The political board is melting bigly. I hope Chicken gets that board cleaned up before the 2024 election. I miss the informative debates and the memes. Now it is just retards and memes trying to out retard the other retards there.
Get a load of this fricking boot-licker
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:50 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:100%
Why would the CCP need to sign anything when they have a puppet regime right now.
the congressional hearings on the bidens and clintons that will come after putin prevails will be historic
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:51 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
Also 60 tons moving at 40mph has to be terrifying/incredible to see on the battlefield It's actually 68+ tons. I was a tank commander on an M1A2 Abrams and spent over 20 years of my life on those beasts. When we were combat loaded with full compliment of service main gun rounds, 50 cal ammo, 7.62 ammo and gear, we were at 72 tons. Can reach out and hit moving direct fire targets we'll over 2400 m away while hauling arse. The fire control system is a sight to see. With the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) the tank Commander's can be scanning and locking on targets while the gunner is lazing and blazing.
Thanks for posting this! Is the stabilization of the turret really that good because that’s just not fair
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:51 pm to MorgusTheMagnificent
quote:Maybe next time don't invade countries, and then other countries won't join NATO as a result
Exactly, now that they’re accepted into NATO, they do
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:52 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
the congressional hearings on the bidens and clintons
Are you high.
They are untouchable.
The CCP would never allow it.
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:53 pm to Palantir
quote:
Maybe next time don't invade countries, and then other countries won't join NATO as a result
This was going to happen. Rewrite history elsewhere.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News