Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:38 pm to
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Russia is clearly the aggressor here


Who said otherwise?

This is a gigantic laundering operation that has yielded tens of billions in untethered money.

I feel for the innocent people of Ukraine (as opposed to those perpetrating acts of ethnic cleansing). They are truly the victims here.
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6881 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Who said otherwise?


That appears to be what the other guy is driving at.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145307 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

This is a gigantic laundering operation that has yielded tens of billions in untethered money.

I feel for the innocent people of Ukraine (as opposed to those perpetrating acts of ethnic cleansing). They are truly the victims here.

so true. what the bidens and clintons are doing to the people of ukraine is despicable. i am with you. hopefully putin prevails and cleans it all up
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
948 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Only this didn’t happen by in large. frick Putin.

Leftists, on the other hand, call anyone not blowing Zalenskyy a Putin fanboy.

I’m against being robbed by Ukraine.

This isn’t difficult.


The largest portion of money going to fund Ukraine is actually money being spent to replenish the equipment and material the U.S. military is sending to Ukraine. You think the Russian military is getting smashed through mean thoughts? No, its U.S. and European arms that are hollowing out the Russian military.
Posted by MorgusTheMagnificent
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2014
1864 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:41 pm to
Exactly, now that they’re accepted into NATO, they do have nukes by proxy
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6881 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:42 pm to
Ukraine isn't in NATO WTF are you talking about?

And if NATO accepts them now... it's only because dumbass Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine definitely wasn't in NATO before this started, or again are you privy to some big state secrets that no one but you and Putin know about?
This post was edited on 9/11/22 at 7:44 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

To my knowledge, there was no NATO buildup in Ukraine


They were going to be members. My take, Putin was either using it as an excuse, was truly concerned with the ice cream eater being installed, or both (this is what I believe). As I have stated before, if China was cozying up to Mexico or Canada with a treaty aligning militarily with the CCP against the USA, then it would be go time. I could give a shite about how we may be viewed. Sadly, with Trudeau slobbing Xi’s knob, this isn’t totally implausible.
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6881 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to
So you think the US would invade Mexico or Canada if either became military partners with China?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98461 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

The political board is melting bigly.


The political board is literally cheering Putin for "finally taking the gloves off" and targeting civilian infrastructure. Which is, of course, a war crime by definition, not that that would bother them.

quote:

I hope Chicken gets that board cleaned up before the 2024 election. I miss the informative debates and the memes. Now it is just retards and memes trying to out retard the other retards there.


Those window lickers have given the management ample incentive to do something about them long before now. I assume the political board is the way it is because somebody wants it that way. The ownership can run the place however they see fit, but I think it's a black mark on an otherwise great site.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25944 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

USA didn’t have a very nice response when nukes were stockpiled at our doorstep. Is it really that unreasonable for Russia to have a negative reaction? Particularly after they were told this wouldn’t happen?


Russia pushed for the removal of Ukraine's nukes. They agreed to respect their boundaries if they gave up their nukes. Russia got what they wanted and neutered Ukraine but then they just started taking what they wanted anyway.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145307 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

, if China was cozying up to Mexico or Canada with a treaty aligning militarily with the CCP against the USA
there is a 0% chance we would invade mexico or canada if they signed some kind of military treaty with china. zero
Posted by MorgusTheMagnificent
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2014
1864 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:47 pm to
Sure, not today
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:48 pm to
With Biden in charge...he would probably join the CCP and assist in the invasion.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

there is a 0% chance we would invade mexico or canada if they signed some kind of military treaty with china. zero


Right, because the US would never do that.

Then again...you may be right. Why would the CCP need to sign anything when they have a puppet regime right now.
Posted by Porpus
Covington, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1684 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

The political board is melting bigly. I hope Chicken gets that board cleaned up before the 2024 election. I miss the informative debates and the memes. Now it is just retards and memes trying to out retard the other retards there.



Get a load of this fricking boot-licker
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145307 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Why would the CCP need to sign anything when they have a puppet regime right now.
100%

the congressional hearings on the bidens and clintons that will come after putin prevails will be historic
Posted by TacoNash
Member since Mar 2020
715 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Also 60 tons moving at 40mph has to be terrifying/incredible to see on the battlefield It's actually 68+ tons. I was a tank commander on an M1A2 Abrams and spent over 20 years of my life on those beasts. When we were combat loaded with full compliment of service main gun rounds, 50 cal ammo, 7.62 ammo and gear, we were at 72 tons. Can reach out and hit moving direct fire targets we'll over 2400 m away while hauling arse. The fire control system is a sight to see. With the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) the tank Commander's can be scanning and locking on targets while the gunner is lazing and blazing.


Thanks for posting this! Is the stabilization of the turret really that good because that’s just not fair
Posted by Palantir
I've been a Columbia House
Member since Oct 2020
691 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Exactly, now that they’re accepted into NATO, they do
Maybe next time don't invade countries, and then other countries won't join NATO as a result
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

the congressional hearings on the bidens and clintons


Are you high.

They are untouchable.

The CCP would never allow it.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34754 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Maybe next time don't invade countries, and then other countries won't join NATO as a result


This was going to happen. Rewrite history elsewhere.
first pageprev pagePage 1694 of 3865Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram