- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s happening, Get in here right now! Wisconsin is the first domino!
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:15 am to Padme
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:15 am to Padme
quote:
guess it’s something, there must be more than a smidgen
its only virtue signalling.
my guess is it was suggested as partial cover for the gop fake slate of electors in trumpy sedition.
too late.
they are going to prison and so will whomever in wisconsin facilitated the fake slate process.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 8:16 am
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:17 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Kjnstkmn
Maybe try reading what I wrote, I said nothing is going to come from this. I was open to the cheating claims (I'm sure there was some) but there was NO proof, zero shown.
I never said I am happy with Biden, I think he is doing a horrible job. What I said is that the dems will not allow Trump to run, they are going to try to use the 14th amendment and Jan 6 to keep him from running. In 2022 they are going to after some of the outspoken Trump supporters like MTG, Cawthorne, etc. IF the can set precendent to ban them and then use it on Trump.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:19 am to SpotLight17171717
So they grew a pair of balls when they knew it would amount to nothing?
Color me unimpressed.
Color me unimpressed.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:41 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
How do you withdraw electors who have already voted and seated a new president?
You don’t.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 8:44 am to tjv305
I believe Vos is personally responsible for all the drop boxes.
You can bet that POS wants to kill this.
You can bet that POS wants to kill this.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 8:56 am
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:00 am to SoFla Tideroller
I’m a little confused with the fact there is zero coverage of this (outside of GP). I found in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that a resolution was rejected, but that’s it.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:02 am to Pintail
Lets go pintail
clap clap clap-clap-clap
clap clap clap-clap-clap
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:44 am to TheRoarRestoredInBR
quote:EO 13848 is over. The intel agencies were so spread with CCP apologists that anything derogatory about the CCP or any foreign election meddling that wasn't to diss Trump-- was omitted from the report. (SEE Ratcliffe stories) The election was certified for Biden. They got away with packing the votes for Biden. It is done, like it or not. There is no plan to get justice for a corrupt system and the key players.
Poor Latina30, LSU 81, Holden Cough44,etc..
Y'all still can't put 2 and 2 together. Why EO 13848,etc..went on the books a year before the election, what's in those PEADs, why a second Gitmo Courthouse with a media room is being completed, why Trump Pence Barr pics are still up in Fed office lobbies 13 months later,etc..
Please cite where anything in the E.O.s are going to reinstall Trump or expose the swamp.
Look beyond the title of this and many other articles on GTMO NAS court rooms. Pentagon Building New Secret Courtroom at Guantánamo Bay
Certain things are always classified/secret in GTMO. But if you would actually read about the subject. The second court room is because of attorney complaints of past trials. The second court room is to accommodate the constant complaints from terrorists lawyers. It seems there is plenty of egg on the U.S. govts faces regarding the secret torture done in 2003-2004.
The lawyers of the terrorists are essentially being appeased with a court room with more room for reporters and less CIA cutting off the feed. Yes, Obama spent millions on a court room. Yes our govt/Pentagon is wasteful enough to build a 4mil courtroom just to appease the political correctness from the terrorists lawyers.
quote:
The second court was designed before President Biden took office with an administration-wide goal of ending detention operations at the base at Guantánamo Bay. It is being built in the United States for assembly at Guantánamo and is expected to be up and running in the middle of 2023, Mr. Flesvig said.
Meantime, workers can be seen at the court compound preparing a space adjacent to the existing courtroom for the new one. But Defense Department officials have yet to decide where to put the virtual gallery, or calculate its cost, he said.
The new court has room for just three defendants, too small for the Sept. 11 case, unless the judge severs some the five defendants from the joint capital punishment trial.
The plan does, however, allow for a scenario of two death-penalty cases being tried at the same time. In the Sept. 11 case, reporters and victims would watch live. But family members and shipmates of the 17 sailors killed in the Qaeda suicide attack of the destroyer Cole off Yemen in 2000, who routinely attend sessions, would be kept away from the court with other observers, watching video feeds.
It appears to be tailor made for the conspiracy murder trial of three men who were recently charged in two terrorist bombings in Indonesia in 2002 and 2003 that killed more than 200 people. Lawyer James R. Hodes, who represents the lead defendant, Encep Nurjaman, who is known as Hambali, said that even at the current court, access has been far from open.
Public viewing at Mr. Hambali’s arraignment in August was strictly controlled by the military, which decides which reporters, law students or human rights advocates can board a Pentagon charter plane to travel to the base. The military also controls access to two remote video sites inside the Pentagon or at Fort Meade in Maryland.
“I’ve observed trials in Mongolia that were more transparent than this,” Mr. Hodes said.
To be sure, some secrets have been declassified, particularly in the death-penalty cases, which have been mired in pretrial hearings for about a decade.
A medical expert recently testified in open court about the post-traumatic stress of a prisoner who was waterboarded by the C.I.A. in 2002. Previously, the doctor’s descriptions of the trauma would have been consigned to a classified session that excluded both the public and the prisoner.
Separately, the intelligence services permitted open court discussion of something that defense lawyers had known for years: Under a secret agreement, the C.I.A. requisitioned nine F.B.I. agents and temporarily made them agency operatives to interrogate prisoners in a network of black sites where the C.I.A. used torture in its interrogations. The agreement is still classified, but the intelligence agencies last month permitted its existence to be known.
But the new courtroom reflects a trend toward what appears at times to be a peculiar pick-and-choose transparency.
For example, for 17 years the military routinely took visiting journalists to the detention facilities where most captives are kept, but required them to delete photographs that showed cameras, gates and other security procedures. Then, the military undertook a consolidation that moved Mr. Mohammed and other detainees who were held by the C.I.A. from a secret site to the maximum-security portion of those once showcase facilities — and declared the entire detention zone off limits to journalists.
Their empty, formerly C.I.A.-controlled prison is off limits to reporters too. Defense lawyers who are seeking a preservation order on the site, describe it as a rapidly deteriorating facility that was clearly unfit for the prisoners and their guards. One military lawyer who visited there recently described carcasses of dead tarantulas in the empty cellblocks.
In 2019, a Marine judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers discussing a new triple-wide, wheelchair accessible holding cell at the court used the expression “jumbo cell” — derived from a Miami Herald article — 30 times in a single court hearing.
Security officers subsequently sent word that the nickname for the cell, essentially a description of a security measure, could no longer be spoken in open court. The prohibition continues, although the military showed reporters the new jumbo cell before a hearing on the 20th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.
“This is an ad hoc classification system,” said James P. Anderson, the security specialist assigned to the defense team of Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, who has spent nights in the cell at the court complex. “Things that used to be unclassified become classified just because the person reviewing it is uncomfortable with its use. It defies all reasonable logic.”
On the evening of Oct. 28, an anonymous government official sent word to the judge that a paragraph should be censored from a statement a prisoner was about to read to a military jury about his torture by the C.I.A.
The judge considered the request and refused, noting that the statement was not classified.
In it, the prisoner Majid Khan quoted Jose Rodriguez, the former C.I.A. counterterrorism director, as saying in a newspaper article that “mistakes were made” in the operation of a particularly grisly C.I.A. prison known as the Salt Pit. Mr. Khan was tortured there in 2003.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:47 am to CelticDog
quote:
they are going to prison and so will whomever in wisconsin facilitated the fake slate process.
Dude, give it up already. You've been saying this crap for years and none of it has come to pass and it's never going to. You're coming across as totally unhinged
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:57 am to FredBear
quote:
a unanimous vote to move the legislation to the Rules Committee
Like most bills it will die in committee
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:59 am to CelticDog
quote:
they are going to prison
Wait, who do you think is going to prison?
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:13 pm to SpotLight17171717
How did this happen? There Assembly, while GOP has an edge, does have Democrats in it.
How did they get Democrats to agree to this, since it was voted on "unanimously".
Also there are TWO houses in the Legislature, the other one is the Senate, don't they have to take on this legislation now or are the elctors only determined by the Assembly (whie possible, I doubt it).
But how did they get the Democrats to agree?
And are they the same Assemnly that voted for the Previous electors, there was an election last November in many states.
What is to stop them from withdawing their electors for, say, the election of JFK in 1960 now?
How did they get Democrats to agree to this, since it was voted on "unanimously".
Also there are TWO houses in the Legislature, the other one is the Senate, don't they have to take on this legislation now or are the elctors only determined by the Assembly (whie possible, I doubt it).
But how did they get the Democrats to agree?
And are they the same Assemnly that voted for the Previous electors, there was an election last November in many states.
What is to stop them from withdawing their electors for, say, the election of JFK in 1960 now?
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:14 pm to Eurocat
quote:
But how did they get the Democrats to agree?
They didn’t. This was a committee level procedural hurdle. It won’t get out of committee, and it won’t pass either house if it does.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:29 pm to Indefatigable
I don't know when people will begin to understand that Breitbart intentionally twists things for attention and clicks.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)