- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is it an athletic competition or pageant?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:24 am
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:24 am
Three power 5 champions are undefeated. They won their conference and beat every team they faced. They could do nothing more except maybe look better doing it, but it is all about winning right?
The other two conference champions have one loss each. However one of them defeated the other when they played.
If you leave out an undefeated champion then it is reduced to eye test competition.
The other two conference champions have one loss each. However one of them defeated the other when they played.
If you leave out an undefeated champion then it is reduced to eye test competition.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:25 am to novabill
quote:
leave out an undefeated champion
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:26 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
So the games don’t matter, right?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:27 am to novabill
A pageant when it comes to certain programs. Always has been and will be.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:27 am to Chad504boy
Who cares? They both lost a game when another power 5 team did not. Sorry about your luck.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:28 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:They absolutely do. They’re a component.
So the games don’t matter, right?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:28 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or Georgia?
Exactly, ask Wash And Mich who they would rather play?
Texas and Florida State would be their answer.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:29 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
So the games don’t matter, right?
You’re telling me that Bama taking down the reigning champions of a 20 plus game win streak matters the least.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:29 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
I mean bama just about lost to a 6-6 auburn team so anything is possible
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:29 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
You’re correct, they wouldn’t. Today’s answer will prove it’s not the current best 4; rather, it’s the competition results during season is what controls.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:29 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
It’s certainly possible. A 6-6 Auburn team had no chance until they did.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:30 am to Chad504boy
quote:
leave out an undefeated champion
We can guess and likely would be right.
But if we take route, why not just determine the winner that way.
Bama beats Michigan
Georgia beats Washington
Bama beats Georgia
Bama is national Champs
No games needed
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 9:31 am
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:30 am to BasilBogomil
quote:
It’s certainly possible.
What an outstanding support of a playoff team
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:31 am to novabill
That’s the whole problem. “Eye tests” are deeply flawed. Whose eyes?
All you have to go on is facts, like records and game results. Everyone “knew” Oregon and the Heisman trophy-winning QB was the “best” team in the Pac-12. Until they lost to Washington. Twice.
frick the “eye test.” All you can go on is the results of the games. FSU won all theirs. Bama didn’t.
All you have to go on is facts, like records and game results. Everyone “knew” Oregon and the Heisman trophy-winning QB was the “best” team in the Pac-12. Until they lost to Washington. Twice.
frick the “eye test.” All you can go on is the results of the games. FSU won all theirs. Bama didn’t.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:31 am to novabill
quote:
If you leave out an undefeated champion then it is reduced to eye test competition.
Which it should. Liberty went undefeated. Are they a top 4 team? Same thing with power 5 conference.
Washington and Oregon literally beat nobodies all year. Same with Mich and osu. Playing little sisters of the poor all year long and going undefeated does not (entitle) a team to a top 4 ranking. As much as participation trophy kids that are adult now want it to be, that's not how life works. That's not how a job works. That's not how it works at a company.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:33 am to Quatrepot
quote:
They absolutely do. They’re a component.
Ok, so name a team that Florida State lost to.
And, since y’all clearly want to put only the best in teams in there, Georgia should receive no penalty for losing yesterday.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:33 am to Chad504boy
quote:
leave out an undefeated champion Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
They wouldn't but that doesn't matter according to participation trophy kids that are now adults.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:34 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Would they beat Bama or UGA right fricking now?
Who knows? Perhaps we should just go back to the pre-BCS days and have people choose the "best" team.
FSU's D-line gives them a chance against anyone. They were the best team we played this year. Do you ruin the hopes of an entire team that worked hard to get where they are because a guy got hurt? Look at what OSU did with a 3rd string QB in the first playoff.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 9:36 am
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:35 am to grizzlylongcut
Not if they have played little sisters of the poor the entire year. Best matters. Not entitlement, more deserving, or entitled. Participation trophies don't count in the real world
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:35 am to Oneforthemoney
quote:
They wouldn't but that doesn't matter according to participation trophy kids that are now adults.
Hold the frick on, you’re the one advocating for there to be no penalty for losing and no reward for winning.
Who’s coming off as a participation trophy kid now?
Popular
Back to top
