Started By
Message

re: Congrats to the Aggies - official Dr D eats crow thread

Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:29 am to
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13239 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Texas Tech is a essentially a remedial high school, if the Pac-12 cares about academics at all they will never allow TT to join

Yeah, as noted academics are a concern, but new money generated from new markets can fund a lot of research. I reckon that might be in Larry Scott's bag of sales pitches.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66608 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:31 am to
If they let TX Tech join, they might as well let Boise in.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58903 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:31 am to
quote:

ESPN now saying it's done with an announcement on Monday. Mizzou, Clemson, and FSU as the other possibilities


I would have never thought the SEC would be the first to go to 16 teams. Its a great conference as it is. Im Definitely surprised they're going after Missou.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38574 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Missouri is completely underrated as a redneck state. Confederate flags all over southern Missouri when I was driving through there a decade ago.



Parts of Missouri are southern. Columbia/St Louis/Kansas City are all run the mill midwestern areas and not really Southern at all
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66608 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:32 am to
I wish they would have snagged OU or OSU but they are likely a package deal.
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42628 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:33 am to
agreed
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38574 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Texas Tech is a essentially a remedial high school, if the Pac-12 cares about academics at all they will never allow TT to join



It's no worse than ASU
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11567 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:34 am to
quote:

If they let TX Tech join, they might as well let Boise in.


Pretty much. If your passion for academics is only lip service, do your conference a favor and go for the bigger fish right off the bat.

..and Baylor is in a BCS conference because they have a rich and powerful alumni presence that demands they go where Texas does. They are putrid in the Big 12 and will be in the Pac/whatever too. Let them go to CUSA or the like, where they belong.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37116 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Missouri is completely underrated as a redneck state. Confederate flags all over southern Missouri when I was driving through there a decade ago.


the state has a lot of redneck and the southern parts do have a southern feel (esp SE Missouri) but the Columbia, STL, and KC areas are not really like that at all

Granted there are a lot of white children conceived in the backs of Trans-AMs but I don't think that really means you are a good fit for the SEC... they fit as much or more with West Virginia or rural Indiana as they do Georgia
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13239 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Granted there are a lot of white children conceived in the backs of Trans-AMs but I don't think that really means you are a good fit for the SEC.
I want to see these demographics
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42628 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:42 am to
quote:


It's no worse than ASU


ASU is a much better school, imo
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58903 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:42 am to
I would think schools like UF, bama, auburn and UGA would have a problem with FSU joining the conference.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38574 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:43 am to
I didn't know Texas Tech was that bad
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9447 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:43 am to
This is awesome...we need a conference expansion board???
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58903 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:44 am to
quote:

e need a conference expansion board???


Agreed, that board was fun last year
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66608 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:46 am to
TX Tech is a joke.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13239 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:48 am to
quote:

TX Tech is a joke.

The Cult of the Dead Cow is watching you.
cDc
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42628 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:51 am to
i wouldnt call it a joke. TT is still educating kids, and doing a good job of it for the most part. I am sure they have some great programs. They accept lower tier students, but those people are still getting an education and contributing to society.

I just thought ASU wasnt a good comparison, since ASU is rapidly improving and is even on the forefront of innovating the future of public universities.

anyway, back to expansion..

i guess the Big12 could go after BYU
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 9:53 am
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:55 am to
Dr. Drunk, mighty fine of you to admit you were mistaken and start an eat crow thread.



Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60766 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 11:20 am to
quote:

it’s the Legislature’s job to make sure it’s in the best interest in the state of Texas."


Dr D, this quote you keep highlighting is just rhetoric from some blow hard politician. How is it against the interest of the State for A&M to go to the SEC? How is the state harmed by Baylor going to CUSA or the MWC? Its nonsense spewed by some self important official.

quote:

If there is a zero % chance that the legislature could cause any problems for A&M, why did they rush & move up their BOR meeting to Monday?


They are just calling the legislature's bluff. All the Leg could do is cut funding to A&M. There's not a zero % chance (of anything really) of that, Its just unlikely. I mean, really, you are going to cut funding for higher education to one of the premiere public universities in the state and country because some private school in Waco might have to play sports in a "lesser" conference? Good luck with that on the campaign trial . And even if they did cut A&M's funding over an athletic conference, its not like it would be permanent or irreversible. There will be another election. You think 5, 10 years from now people will care? Will they really reduce funding to A&M over a football conference? No, they will not.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram