Started By
Message
locked post

Big East considering merging with MWC and CUSA

Posted on 10/22/11 at 8:15 am
Posted by nosaj56
Member since Aug 2007
21991 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 8:15 am
quote:

One of the reasons the Big East may be holding off on any expansion announcements about potential new members is that it is considering a plan that would create a nation-wide football conference incorporating between 28 and 32 teams in four divisions from Conference USA, the Mountain West Conference as well as the Big East.

According to sources from those conferences, the plan was devised as a way that the Big East could ensure its place as one of the six conferences receiving automatic BCS bids.

The document, which was obtained by The Globe, reveals an alternative plan which would help the Big East maintain its AQ status -- automatic qualification -- but also provide access to the Mountain West and Conference USA, who hope to gain such status.

Under the plan, Super Conference would consist of four divisions: West, Mountain, Central and the Big East.

In the 32-team format, the West Division would consist of Boise State, Hawaii, UNLV, Nevada, Fresno State, San Diego State, Utah State and San Jose State.

The Mountain Division would consist of Air Force, Wyoming, Colorado State, New Mexico, UTEP, SMU, Tulsa and Houston.

The Central Division would consist of Marshall, Memphis, Southern Mississippi, Tulane, UAB, Rice, Temple and Louisiana Tech.

And the Big East Division would consist of Louisville, UConn, Rutgers, Cincinnati, South Florida, Central Florida, East Carolina and Navy. West Virginia is not included in this plan, with the assumption being the Mountaineers would be headed to the Big 12 to replace Missouri which will presumably wind up in the SEC along with Texas A&M.
quote:

The scaled down version of 28 teams would not include San Jose State in the West, move Houston from the Mountain to the Central Division, eliminate Temple and Louisiana Tech from the Central Division and not include Navy in the Big East division.
LINK
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
10207 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 8:17 am to
why would adding more crappy teams help them keep their AQ status? none of the teams mentioned deserve an automatic BCS bid.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5194 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 9:14 am to
That's going to be a mess.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51713 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 9:18 am to
quote:

In the 32-team format,


Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24791 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 9:29 am to
no way this happens
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32018 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Hawaii, UNLV, Nevada
quote:

Louisiana Tech


I guess its the WAC too?
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22046 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:32 am to
I like the idea...I want these smaller teams to have a chance to play with the big boys...
This post was edited on 10/22/11 at 11:33 am
Posted by Chitter Chatter
In and Out of Consciousness
Member since Sep 2009
4660 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:00 pm to
It would be nice for LA Tech but honestly they bring nothing to the table. They get selected because there a spot to fill and no one else 'big enough' to fill it. I like Tech and if their admin had done it's job a few years ago, they'd be in a better position than they are now.
Posted by ULL Cool J
Member since Jun 2008
924 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:06 pm to
This looks like the beginning of a mid-major subdivision; i.e., the welterweights of college football. Go ahead and add the Sunbelt and WAC and have a Div. 1.5A championship game.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76704 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:38 pm to
How are they going to split that BCS Bowl check? Will 28-32 teams split that one check like another other "conference" does? If so, what the point?
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69656 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 9:47 pm to
Id do backflips for the 32 team one
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/22/11 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

why would adding more crappy teams help them keep their AQ status? none of the teams mentioned deserve an automatic BCS bid.

No team DESERVES an automatic bid, they earn them.
Posted by blzr
MB
Member since Mar 2011
30105 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 12:52 am to
This won't happen, but it does show how desperate teh big east is. after Mizzou goes to the SEC they are over. I hope the Merger gets a BCS bid.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41237 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 1:10 am to
quote:

West Virginia is not included in this plan, with the assumption being the Mountaineers would be headed to the Big 12


Is west virginia going to be the only team East of the Mississippi?
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11004 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 2:09 am to
quote:

I like the idea...I want these smaller teams to have a chance to play with the big boys..


Exactly, and its not as overwhelming because you know only 1 team will make it out of their probably to a BCS bowl.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 2:22 am to
That would be a huge clusterfrick.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18469 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Big East considering merging with MWC and CUSA

WILL. NOT. HAPPEN.

/thread
This post was edited on 10/23/11 at 10:50 am
Posted by NoBoBullDog
Member since Aug 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

It would be nice for LA Tech but honestly they bring nothing to the table. They get selected because there a spot to fill and no one else 'big enough' to fill it. I like Tech and if their admin had done it's job a few years ago, they'd be in a better position than they are now.


What the hell are you talking about?!? What did Tech's admin NOT do a few years ago?
Posted by NoBoBullDog
Member since Aug 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

It would be nice for LA Tech but honestly they bring nothing to the table. They get selected because there a spot to fill and no one else 'big enough' to fill it. I like Tech and if their admin had done it's job a few years ago, they'd be in a better position than they are now.


What the hell are you talking about?!? What did Tech's admin NOT do a few years ago?
Posted by Chitter Chatter
In and Out of Consciousness
Member since Sep 2009
4660 posts
Posted on 10/23/11 at 4:23 pm to
You really think Reneau and Oakes did all they could do to get in CUSA years back? Dan doesn't care about athletics. It's only until a few big donors (Davison) and a couple of others saw that things needed to change - upgrading facilities and thinking outside the box - for LA Tech to get moving in the right direction. I would love for Tech to get in CUSA because they have more in common with many of those schools than the WAC or the Belt. It may take a while for them to become more 'attractive' to CUSA. I'm afraid that if UH and SMU head east, if CUSA exapnds Tech won't get that invite. UNT stands a better chance to get invited by location alone. I'm not saying UNT is better than Tech at all - it's about the benjamins and potential TV sets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram