- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UL-L keeps Bustle
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:52 am
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:52 am
Apparently, years of losing and 6/6 seasons with no bowl game is good enough for the Cajuns.
Thoughts? Does anyone really care?
Thoughts? Does anyone really care?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 11:57 am to Count Chocula
they deserve another year of him
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:01 pm to The Egg
Beating K State was a feather in his cap, though
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:04 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Money may have been a big player. ULM let go of Weatherbie and I bet they only did that because his contract was up. If he had another year on the contract, he'd probably still be there.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:06 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:
Beating K State was a feather in his cap, though
Therein lies a problem. When this happens once every 15 years (like Texas A&M 15 years ago), it gives teams like USL a false hope that they can play/win regularly against BCS schools. In all actuality, USL should be in 1AA but pride and $$$ will not let that happen!
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:15 pm to Count Chocula
quote:No coach is going to change this.
Apparently, years of losing and 6/6 seasons with no bowl game is good enough for the Cajuns
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:19 pm to Count Chocula
recruiting is the problem, so their solution is to have him go into the offseason with one year left on his contract
brilliant
brilliant
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:42 pm to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
No coach is going to change this.
True dat
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:46 pm to supatigah
quote:
recruiting is the problem
As is scheduling. Got to play 2 or 3 LSU's and Texas' of the world for $$$ payday every year. If you can't beat Florida International, what chance you got against Tennessee? You end up 5/7 or 6/6 every year at best - then whine when you don't get a bowl bid.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:53 pm to Count Chocula
Isn't USL's best football record ever like 8-4? Wtf is so wrong with a 6-6 year?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:53 pm to supatigah
quote:
recruiting is the problem
and they keep trying to go out of state to do it. I know that most of the talent in the acadiana area won't qualify for college, but there is a lot of talent in state. They need to start working with the local high school coaches to start getting their players college eligible, or sponsor programs like the one Big Dave and Bandit do where they go to junior highs and tell kids what they need to do starting their freshman year of HS to be on track to be eligible for college sports.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 12:57 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Wtf is so wrong with a 6-6 year
I believe they were 6-6 for 4 of the last 6 years. The other 2 were losing seasons. Last winning season was 7/5, believe dating back to 1995.
So yes, I guess 6-6 aint so bad, untill you look at the last 14 years!
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:01 pm to Count Chocula
quote:
I believe they were 6-6 for 4 of the last 6 years. The other 2 were losing seasons. Last winning season was 7/5, believe dating back to 1995.
So yes, I guess 6-6 aint so bad, untill you look at the last 14 years!
Exactly. They should play one or two more IAA schools if they want instant wins. 6-6 ain't bad when you are playing 2 BCS teams a year.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:03 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
but there is a lot of talent in state
True, problem there is lets say you have 30 "blue chippers" in La this year. 20 are going to LSU, 6 are going out of state, leaving 4 that will be fought over by Tulane, La Tech, McNeese, UL-Monroe, UL-Lafayette, Nichols, Northwestern etc. Thats why they go out of state IMO.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:07 pm to Count Chocula
in state recruiting is not really a problem, it is the fact that they are getting worked over for the second tier instate kids by LaTech and Tulane.
and McNeese is swooping in and taking the non-qualifiers
and McNeese is swooping in and taking the non-qualifiers
This post was edited on 12/2/09 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:07 pm to Count Chocula
quote:
Tulane, La Tech, McNeese, UL-Monroe, UL-Lafayette, Nichols, Northwestern
Tulane- Proabably not smart enough to get in
La Tech- Next Boise? More like next Fail
ULM- Where the frick is Monroe?
Lafayette- We're going to get shitfaced instead
Nichols- This is a college?
Northwestern- Don't they play in the B11?
See, there really isn't any reason for top kids to go to any other school in LA if not for LSU.
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:08 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Exactly. They should play one or two more IAA schools if they want instant wins. 6-6 ain't bad when you are playing 2 BCS teams a year.
Cant play more than one (1) 1AA school per year and be bowl eligable. Not that it matters in USL's case anway!
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:11 pm to Count Chocula
quote:
Cant play more than one (1) 1AA school per year and be bowl eligable. Not that it matters in USL's case anway!
I thought it was you can play more than one, but only one counts in your 6 wins you need to have to be eligible?
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:13 pm to supatigah
especially when teams they recruiting against start telling the kids he will not be your coach in 2 yrs
Make the move now
Make the move now
Posted on 12/2/09 at 1:14 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
I thought it was you can play more than one, but only one counts in your 6 wins you need to have to be eligible?
When is the last time that they beat a 1AA school
Popular
Back to top

4




