- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oklahoma blue blood
Posted on 12/1/21 at 2:22 pm to Bear88
Posted on 12/1/21 at 2:22 pm to Bear88
quote:
Wow if true . No way he has proven to be worth over 10 mil a year
1) he has over 20 years of sustained success as a defensive coordinator and recruiter (he’s coached in 8 national championship games)
2) the market has reset and all coaches at top tier schools will sign mega contracts
Posted on 12/1/21 at 2:32 pm to White Tiger
So LSU is new money with championships, but USC, ND are blue bloods without championships, got it.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:02 pm to theOG
quote:
1) he has over 20 years of sustained success as a defensive coordinator and recruiter (he’s coached in 8 national championship games) 2) the market has reset and all coaches at top tier schools will sign mega contracts
Other schools are overpaying but at least it is for coaches who have been HCs and have had success running a program …. 10 mil for someone who hasn’t proven he can be “ the man” is crazy. He could have been had a lot cheaper IMO but whatever. Congrats
If you offering BV that kind of money, is DABO going to get 15-20 million ?
This post was edited on 12/1/21 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:16 pm to Bear88
Not sure if LSU is a Blue Blood but if we're not, we're probably pretty close to being in that argument. Was irrelevant for 30 years or so but the past 20+ we have been.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:19 pm to FreddieMac
ND is still a blue blood I'd think. They've been successful under Kelly but not championships obviously. Bama skews that due to their dynasty. They only had a small stint of sucking and Kelly stabilized them again. USC though, you could argue is not a BB anymore. They have not been the least relevant since Pete left. That's probably why they went all in on Riley.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:22 pm to FreddieMac
So self-proclaimed. Got it.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:24 pm to roobedoo
quote:
It could help them prove their assumption, or shoot it down.
Ohio State hired Ryan Day... the hire itself will prove nothing about Oklahoma's status as a blood
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:28 pm to CaptainPanic
quote:
It is only a loose term amongst non-blue blood fanbases, such as LSU.
It's pretty well defined if you use the Google machine
Good so there is no need to debate this .. just give us the exact standards and it’s all settled
Posted on 12/1/21 at 3:39 pm to roobedoo
OU is blue blood for sure.
Also, the term “blue blood” is pretty damn outdated considering it includes places like Texas, Tennessee and Nebraska.
This stuff doesn’t mean a damn thing to 17 year olds today.
Also, the term “blue blood” is pretty damn outdated considering it includes places like Texas, Tennessee and Nebraska.
This stuff doesn’t mean a damn thing to 17 year olds today.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 5:40 pm to roobedoo
Oklahoma was dominating in the 70's and 80's while LSU was "hoping" to beat Tulane
Popular
Back to top


1








