Started By
Message

re: Landry insinuates on AFR that he won’t allow LsU to pursue a “big time coach”

Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:07 pm to
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34900 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Landry is speaking lawyer. Listen a couple of times again knowing that.


He can saw whatever he wants to now. He already lied saying the bos would get a committee and one of the members said it wasn't true.

Scott and verge were already on it.

By the time someone is hired landry won't have his fingerprints on it. He is using this shite to try and get rid of Woodward.

Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38489 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:08 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



Yeah you sure aren’t skyscreaming over nothing
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38489 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

He is using this shite to try and get rid of Woodward.



Which is a good thing.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37463 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

That’s not possible. And he knows it. Every contract forever is done that way…and will be going forward. If the state is involved they won’t give a deal like that. And the state WILL be involved So…

Every coach has a contract with the state, and the state does pay a portion of his salary. But, what’s to stop the coach from also having a contract with a private company that pays the majority of the contracted value?
Posted by lsufan0582
337 born
Member since Jan 2022
3698 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:32 pm to
This is how it works.

Iirc almost all of Kelly's salary was paid privately. Less than 1 million annually from the school itself
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37463 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:43 pm to
I know that’s how it works from a practical standpoint, but according to our dipshit governor the way it’s technically currently written the state is ultimately on the hook for the buyout of a contract, even though private entities agree to pay it.

ETA: I don’t know if he was playing dumb and trying to distance himself from the process, but he also stated that he wasn’t aware of anyone stating that they’d privately pay for the buyout before BK was fired. Which really sounds like gross incompetence if that’s the case.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 5:46 pm
Posted by lsufan0582
337 born
Member since Jan 2022
3698 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:45 pm to
Right, so we know how it works

Hes just trying to skew something visually on his favor. Like ive said a few times and he basically confirmed, the boosters will get who they want
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram