Started By
Message
locked post

Kiffin on the hot seat?

Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:35 pm
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12473 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:35 pm
He seems to think so.

LINK

quote:

You know that one coach's future in Los Angeles may rest on this one game.

What you may not know is that this coach is USC's Lane Kiffin.

"I would say that is a fair assessment," Kiffin said.

quote:

If he loses to UCLA a week after losing to Notre Dame, the tidal wave is coming.

"I'm the head coach, I'm the one responsible for all this," Kiffin said Thursday after the bowl-banned Trojans' final practice of the season. "So, yes, going into this game, I face a tremendous amount of pressure."
This post was edited on 12/3/10 at 11:37 pm
Posted by GeauxWarTigers
Auburn
Member since Oct 2010
18046 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:38 pm to
His first year coaching there and a program on probation. I think he has a little time before his seat gets warm. Not to mention the rest of the pac 10 is stronger than it has been in recent history (oregon and stanford).
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12473 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:40 pm to
I agree. I was surprised when I read this, but you never know.
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3971 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

I agree. I was surprised when I read this, but you never know.


Maybe they've realized pretty quickly that he's a fraud.
Posted by rented mule
Member since Sep 2005
2822 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:58 pm to
I believe Mike Garrett knew full well that Kiffin was a fraud. I think that was his F.U. to USC because he knew he was on his way out.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31166 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 12:13 am to
I think he will be granted a fair timetable, and more of the probation era tenure(which handicaps any hire)..

But, I doubt Pat Haden is his biggest fan? And it would seem unless Kiffin skyrockets in future years, once sanctions ease, that he'll end up USC's rebound hire?

I think that comment may just be Kiffin, either using coach speak BS, or he may actually be truly growing up a bit and taking accountability for the ND loss, and in signaling to his AD and his Team, that everyone is held to task.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 12:20 am to
$C fans were pretty down on Kiffin last week on a couple of their message boards. I think they are fully aware they made a mistake.
Posted by Dice
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
896 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 12:56 am to
It doesn't upset me to see him struggle.
Posted by D500MAG
Oklahoma
Member since Oct 2010
4025 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 1:38 am to
He said it to give the players something to play for. IMO, I don't think he takes the job knowing what would happen, and it would not surprise me if he no longer wants to be there.
Giving a coach more time is the correct thing to do. A coach like Kiffin doesn't want his every move to be watched. After his time at UT, it would be wise to assume he is being watched very closely. USC has a program that they are going to have to restore. Kiffin thought he was going back for business as usual.
This post was edited on 12/4/10 at 1:39 am
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33878 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 3:43 am to
If he is on the hot seat, then he's a bigger idiot than I thought

-he was on staff when Bush was a player
-he knew damn good and well that shite was foul
-there was no doubt sanctions were coming

what dumbfrick in the world wouldn't put that into his contract? "if I take the job, no matter what the record is, as long as we're on probation, you cant fire me for win/loss record"

Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26749 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 4:37 am to
No way he gets fired this year. It will be tough on him the next two though, with all the scholarship reductions.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41810 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Not to mention the rest of the pac 10 is stronger than it has been in recent history













2 good teams in the whole league is not strong or stronger.

The reason he could actually be out after only 1 year is that they have a new AD who may want to hire his own coach.

I doubt Kiffin will be fired simply because they will not want a huge buyout, but it is possible and there probably has been some discussion on the matter. In the end he is safe for at least 3 years.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39413 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 7:32 am to
He's not going to get fired for no other reason than economics

There probably will be a lot of pressure to tell his dad to "retire" though.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41810 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 8:04 am to
Yeah. Just like RR in Michigan, Kiffin is going to be told to make some defensive changes, although I am not sure he will this year.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19693 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 8:31 am to
Pat Haden is no dummy. I'm sure he's looking for every reason he can find to fire Kiffy.
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6884 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Yeah. Just like RR in Michigan, Kiffin is going to be told to make some defensive changes, although I am not sure he will this year


Like what? He has one of the best DCs in ALL of football.

Kiffin just isn't a good coach. You can't blame the scholarship limitations this season. It has no impact at all yet. The real impact will be felt in 3 or so seasons.
Posted by CountryVolFan
Knoxville, TN
Member since Dec 2008
3110 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Maybe they've realized pretty quickly that he's a fraud.


This
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62965 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 10:46 am to
quote:

If he is on the hot seat, then he's a bigger idiot than I thought

-he was on staff when Bush was a player
-he knew damn good and well that shite was foul
-there was no doubt sanctions were coming

what dumbfrick in the world wouldn't put that into his contract? "if I take the job, no matter what the record is, as long as we're on probation, you cant fire me for win/loss record"



He was a dumbass for taking that job now anyway. The Tennessee is currently a much better gig. He's still only in his mid 30s, plenty of time to land that dream USC job AFTER they've recovered from sanctions if he really wanted it.



And there's no way USC is going to fire him. Who the frick would want to go there now?
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Kiffin thought he was going back for business as usual.


yep, and things are catching up with him. i imagine the powers at usc are keeping him on a short lease as they do not want further national embarrasement. for the life of me, i can't figure out why they hired that snake but i'm glad they did. also, it appears that his dad, supposed inventer of the tampa 2 is losing his touch and he is not going to coach forever. in fact, he may be in "semi-retirement" mode now. when his dad retires and he loses his protector, i expect kiffin's reign to be over. doubt there well be many more schools that will hire him. couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 10:50 am to
not to mention next year USC loses 2 starting LB's so their D won't be nearly as good as this year in all likelihood.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram