- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kelly's buyout settled:
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:27 pm to bayou85
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:27 pm to bayou85
quote:
He's saying because someone else got away with it means its moral. thats not true.
I don’t know that he’s saying that per se. It’s more that having an affair doesn’t necessarily rise to the level of a breach of a morality clause in an employment contract.
2
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:28 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
ETA: This is no longer on Jacques page so someone with sense talked to him.
SI still running with Jacque's story:
LINK
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:30 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I don’t know that he’s saying that per se. It’s more that having an affair doesn’t necessarily rise to the level of a breach of a morality clause in an employment contract.
True.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:30 pm to Mo Jeaux
What about drinking on the job?
That would get me fired. If they caught me.
That would get me fired. If they caught me.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:37 pm to FMtTXtiger
What is his name?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:44 pm to TigerAttorney
Sounds like it could have been more a payment negotiation than some weird loyalty clause threat tactic. 
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:51 pm to Havoc
If Kelly broke any clause in the contract, then why pay him anything?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:53 pm to lsufan0582
Why pay him a dime? frick him.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:16 pm to lsufan0582
Old, possibly, fake news.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:18 pm to MardiGrasCajun
quote:
The morality clause will absolutely be in the next coach’s contract. It covers much more than a piece of arse on the side.
Yes, but it can be limited as to what it covers.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:18 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Yup the guy who offers up a phone autocorrect definitely isn’t one of them.
??
??
Posted on 10/28/25 at 6:01 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It would be removed with a quickness.
No it wouldn’t. Regardless of what you think, the university is going to protect itself in the contract. Saban would be bound by the same moral standards expected as any other coach would be. His Alabama contract made damn sure of it as well. This is a legal contract for employment. It’s not some shite written on a napkin. Lord Saban would still be held accountable.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 6:08 pm to cyarrr
quote:
Yes, but it can be limited as to what it covers.
Really? You think Saban is going to ask them to leave out certain morality issues because he may break those moral standards or clauses expected of him? Y’all are hysterical. Oh hey, I’m going to take the low road right here and get the university sued so I need that left out …but you can’t fire me or withhold any of my money. LMFAO!
Posted on 10/28/25 at 7:06 pm to MardiGrasCajun
quote:
Really? You think Saban is going to ask them to leave out certain morality issues because he may break those moral standards or clauses expected of him?
That’s not what I said or implied.
In my opinion, issues of morality are viewed objectively and in some cases based on community standards.
What a Mormon in Utah believes to be immoral may differ from what a Baptist in Alabama considers immoral.
Kelly having an affair should not be sufficient to breach the contract if it causes no harm to the university. Under what circumstances could the university be sued based on a coaches infidelity?
That aspect of the morality clause, if actually stated, could most certainly be omitted.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News