Started By
Message
locked post

Doing a lot with a little

Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:19 pm
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:19 pm
If a coach can produce good results with a little bit of talent, is it a given that he can do a great results with a lot of talent?

Id say a good example of someone who has done both is Gus Malzahn.

Are there examples of coaches who were relatively better working with underdog teams than teams loaded with talent?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34971 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Are there examples of coaches who were relatively better working with underdog teams than teams loaded with talent?



Well, there are coaches that hate recruiting but do well with lesser talent. Like Mike Gundy, Petrino, etc.
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
17668 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:24 pm to
Houston Nutt? Hell I dunno
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Are there examples of coaches who were relatively better working with underdog teams than teams loaded with talent
Dale Brown was the Master.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Houston Nutt
I was going to say him as well.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 5:07 pm to
I'm sure there are, though I think it has much more to do with the personalities that accompany top talent than the actual talent differential.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6419 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Id say a good example of someone who has done both is Gus Malzahn.

Against the competition Ark State played, they had plenty of talent. See how he does in an Auburn rebuilding year. Heck maybe you're talking this Auburn team lacking talent for a SEC team - I don't know much about them.

Dale Brown didn't do much with his most talented team that had Shaq and Chris Jackson. But he did a lot with his second most talented group - that final 4 team with Rudy Macklin
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41805 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Dale Brown was the Master.



And the inverse. He sucked with talent. Chris Jackson, O'neal and Roberts. One and done.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30767 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 5:52 pm to
Pinkel has done a good job at finding 2 star kids and low 3 star kids and getting a lot out of them.

I believe Sam was a 2 star kid, as well as Washington, out of La.

William moore with Falcons was a 3 star from missouri, Spoon was a 2 1/2-3 star kid from texas.

Several walk ons and found their way into a starting gig. Hell, one of them went from walk on to a senior captain.

Not the biggest fan of his, especially his attitude for a guy who's won nothing, but he does get a lot out of his players. They have their own system, and thats how they grade them.

I know, that rivals and scout have changed their views on kids Missouri offers, and have watched them more closely on grading. Eithert their star system is crap, or Pinkel and them are great at finding diamonds in the rough.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Eithert their star system is crap, or Pinkel and them are great at finding diamonds in the rough.


Rivals has been exposed based upon some of the shite Geoff Ketchum pulled with Texas recruits that mysteriously gained 2-3 stars after committing and commits for other schools losing a star or two after eliminating Texas from consideration.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30767 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 6:09 pm to
What i always found amusing, was when Missouri offered a kid who was a 2 1/2-3 star, nothing. Suddenly 2 weeks later, OU offers and he gets bumped to a 3 1/2 to 4 star. Used to happen to kids MU targeted in Texas.


Posted by thatdude1985
Oxford, AL
Member since Oct 2011
27082 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Id say a good example of someone who has done both is Gus Malzahn.


Auburn's recruiting classes says Malzahn had a lot of talent to work with.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
151086 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 7:35 pm to
Are you saying malzhan hasnt had multiple top 10 recruiting classes to work with?
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27539 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Are you saying malzhan hasnt had multiple top 10 recruiting classes to work with?


Clearly, Auburn is the team with talent. He has also coached at Arkansas State, Tulsa, Arkansas. Malzahn didn't just suddenly start coaching football this year.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36669 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 8:04 pm to
It's assumed, but the number of coaches that achieve great results isn't too high. Either way, you'll never find out until you give the guy a shot.
Posted by TeamLSU
Member since Feb 2009
3746 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:16 am to
james franklin at vandy, is my choice. he gets more out of his players than any coach in the sec. and on top of that THEY ALL GRADUATE.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:11 pm to
for how long? some coaches have a great year and get elevated to top status. bull shite.

some coaches, like at Boise, have better talent than they are credited with.

to even intimate that auburn doesn't have a lot of talent is wrong. they have talent. so the gus bus is better than chizik, we have only seen one year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram