- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crackpot ASOIAF Theories SPOILERS
Posted on 2/21/14 at 5:28 pm to Analyze That
Posted on 2/21/14 at 5:28 pm to Analyze That
Posted on 2/21/14 at 7:39 pm to SoGaFan
quote:
hmm. I think there are some rather large leaps of fantasy in there, but what else can we do to occupy our time waiting...
Agreed.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 9:01 pm to Lima Whiskey
Crackpot theory: Ser Ilyn did not get his tongue removed for saying that Lord Tywin ran the Seven Kingdoms. Ser Ilyn discovered that Jaime and Cersei were actually Aerys bastard children. It would look much too suspicious if Aerys were to just kill him, so he said taking out his tongue was for saying that Lord Tywin ruled the Seven Kingdoms, despite the fact he had probably heard it a few times before from other men.
Ilyn seemed to get a kick out of Jaime telling him he was screwing his sister, and it was his own inside joke that he lost his tongue for. I think in the next novel Ilyn will find a way to tell Jaime of his true ancestry when he escapes Stoneheart. Ser Ilyn has served little purpose in the story, and I do think he'll serve a major role. I think I'm sold on Jaime and Cersei being Aerys' bastards. Jaime will find out about 1/3 of the way into WoW, and Cersei won't find out until seconds before her death when she is killed by Jaime, who already being a kinslayer, won't give a frick. In ADOS, Jaime will be revealed to be the third head of the dragon and one of the major saviors of Westeros, although he'll lose his life in the battle with them.
Plus the delicious irony on Tywin's grave that his only true born child was the mutilated dwarf he abused would be great.
Ilyn seemed to get a kick out of Jaime telling him he was screwing his sister, and it was his own inside joke that he lost his tongue for. I think in the next novel Ilyn will find a way to tell Jaime of his true ancestry when he escapes Stoneheart. Ser Ilyn has served little purpose in the story, and I do think he'll serve a major role. I think I'm sold on Jaime and Cersei being Aerys' bastards. Jaime will find out about 1/3 of the way into WoW, and Cersei won't find out until seconds before her death when she is killed by Jaime, who already being a kinslayer, won't give a frick. In ADOS, Jaime will be revealed to be the third head of the dragon and one of the major saviors of Westeros, although he'll lose his life in the battle with them.
Plus the delicious irony on Tywin's grave that his only true born child was the mutilated dwarf he abused would be great.
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 9:33 pm to OMLandshark
Damn it, I tired of those theories, as well as the A+L=J ones or N+L=J or B+L=J
Posted on 2/21/14 at 9:44 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Ser Ilyn has served little purpose in the story
He did chop off Ned Starks head.
But I do believe it's very possible that Jamie and Cercei are Aerys bastards. And I hope it's true. That irony would dance on Tywin's grave forever
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 10:36 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
I'm in Pompeii drunk will update y'all after
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:31 am to ladytiger118
Movie was CRAP but Kit was fine
.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:52 am to ladytiger118
Ive never seen you on here drunk 
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:54 am to Cosmo
Glassman and her pregamed with Dornish wine.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:13 am to Korin
quote:
Has anyone here been with the series since the beginning in 96?
I started in 97/98ish, when GOT came out in paperback. Ironically, a blurb by Robert Jordan on the cover got me to try it. You folks coming to the series late are lucky as hell.
This post was edited on 2/22/14 at 1:15 am
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:14 am to Cosmo
Twas one of the few times I've posted on here drunk.
Movie was terrible...just, awful. Not enough of Jon Snow's abs either.
Movie was terrible...just, awful. Not enough of Jon Snow's abs either.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:15 am to ladytiger118
quote:
Movie was terrible...just, awful. Not enough of Jon Snow's abs either.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:19 am to auyushu
quote:
You couldn't tell that would be the case just from the previews? I mean, I know you were going for Kit, but still.
I just hope Lord Snow picks his movies better in the future...I get it, that his career is 'safe' for the next 5 years or so and that he's trying to make some money...but if by some bizarre chance that I ever meet him I'm going to tell him he's no Russell Crowe or Gerard Butler when it comes to being a Roman/gladiator/etc. and that he needs to pick better roles.
quote:
Glassman and her pregamed with Dornish wine.
Glass is probably at Finn's already
This post was edited on 2/22/14 at 1:20 am
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:28 am to ladytiger118
quote:
I just hope Lord Snow picks his movies better in the future
Haven't decided if Aaron Paul's choice of Need for Speed was better or worse than Kit's choice of Pompeii.
I'm siding with Aaron Paul since in interviews I've seen him say he was holding out for movies he wanted to do..... He was holding out for a good role but caved to Need for Speed?!?
quote:
but if by some bizarre chance that I ever meet him I'm going to tell him he's no Russell Crowe or Gerard Butler when it comes to being a Roman/gladiator/etc. and that he needs to pick better roles.
psssh. No you wouldn't
Posted on 2/22/14 at 1:33 am to ladytiger118
quote:
Movie was CRAP
False
Posted on 2/22/14 at 9:04 am to OMLandshark
I'd buy it if I didn't believe Aerys was batshit crazy enough to have someone's tongue cut out over less.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 10:18 am to The_Man_of_Steel
quote:
False
I was drunk, but there wasn't enough character building/dialogue at all. Not even enough action/romance. Too short of a movie.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:39 pm to ladytiger118
quote:
but there wasn't enough character building/dialogue at all
The entire first hour of a hour an 45 minute movie was spent exclusively on character building. Action/disaster movies aren't exactly known for their extensive dialogue scenes.
Sounds like you wanted a season of GoT in a 2 hour movie and you didn't get it so you are all pouty. Sober up toots.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:43 pm to The_Man_of_Steel
quote:
Sounds like you wanted a season of GoT in a 2 hour movie and you didn't get it so you are all pouty. Sober up toots.
I know, I'm being picky.
Can't help it; I rarely go to the movies anymore and the quality of shows on TV is that much better than what comes out each week.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 12:53 pm to ladytiger118
quote:
Can't help it; I rarely go to the movies anymore and the quality of shows on TV is that much better than what comes out each week.
Movies are for action and spectacle (and big laughs). TV show are for storytelling and character building. The sooner you accept that, the more you enjoy each medium.
Back to top


0






