Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

RAM timings

Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:11 pm
Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
7981 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:11 pm
I don't know the ins and outs of messing with these. I've heard reducing them can improve performance and get rid of some stuttering in games. Is it worth it to fool with?

My specs:

RAM: 4x8GB 3200mHz; CL16; 16-18-18-38; 1.35V

CPU: i5 10600k @ 5gHz

MOBO: Asus Prime Z490-A
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:44 pm to
These are my current RAM timings:



I have 1.5v pouring through a high end B-Die kit that I've tuned to within an inch of its life. So when I say what I'm about to say with utter sincerity, you should give it heed:

Leave. Your RAM. The frick. Alone.

You will spend hours fighting ghosts in the machine that will make you want to make blood sacrifices to the Old Gods. Timings that will work one second won't work the next. You will clear your CMOS over, and over, and over again. And the result? The tiniest of improvements that would be dwarfed by upgrading, or even tuning, basically anything else.

Now, if you enjoy the process? By all means, join in on the insanity. But if your goal is to meaningfully improve performance and you just want to struggle through it? Yeah, just don't

ETA: Technically it's also tuned to within an inch of my CPU's life. My kit can actually handle 4000/14, but an fclock of 2000 starts throwing WHEA errors
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 7:55 pm
Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
7981 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:50 pm to
Perhaps I will upgrade the sticks.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Perhaps I will upgrade the sticks.


Now that I would support
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18063 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 8:14 pm to
Ram timings help benchmark scores. You would never notice anything in the real world.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

I've heard reducing them can improve performance and get rid of some stuttering in games.


Also, to revisit this, as it's a subject I find most tech reviewers don't spend enough time on: you really, really don't want to be CPU bound when gaming. Sure, they'll tell you that because they say it's wasting money on your GPU, which is true. But in my experience, every game I've ever been CPU bound in has had terrible micro stuttering. I think it's just the nature of CPUs that they don't task switch as well as GPUs do, so they hitch more frequently. If you find yourself in that situation, paradoxically, you might improve the "feel" of the game performance if you increase the graphics settings to the point that you're GPU limited again.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
2033 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 3:58 pm to
Research your CPU/motherboard and see what runs stably at the fastest speeds and timings… proceed to buy that ram and just use XMP/EXPO… you’re now done with messing with your RAM.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65852 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 4:47 pm to
I'm on AMD Expo 30-38-38-96 6000MHz at 1.35v.

DDR5.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27675 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Leave. Your RAM. The frick. Alone.


Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
7981 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

30-38-38-96
Why are the DDR5 timings like this as opposed to the lower numbers?
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Why are the DDR5 timings like this as opposed to the lower numbers?


Happens every generation. Speed goes up, but timings have to significantly loosen to be stable enough to run. As the generation matures, timings will come down. They won’t ever be as low as the previous generation, but they will close the gap. That’s part of why it’s generally not a great idea to spend a lot of money on RAM at the start of a new generation. Just buy a workable kit to start and then invest in a good kit down the road. What will release a couple of years in will generally blow those early sticks out of the water.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65852 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 12:58 am to
It's just kind of how it is, much higher speeds with higher timings than DDR4.

Back when DDR5 was brand new the lowest CAS was 40, then 38, 36 and now at 30 which is where I bought in as they aren't expected to lower much more if any.
This post was edited on 12/16/23 at 12:59 am
Posted by Russianblue
Member since Nov 2007
1110 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 1:40 pm to
lol! I remember trying to overclock my 266mhz sticks and see if I could knock down to 1T timing and 2-2-2 latency!
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Back when DDR5 was brand new the lowest CAS was 40, then 38, 36 and now at 30 which is where I bought in as they aren't expected to lower much more if any.


I’ll be genuinely surprised if by the end of the DDR5 era we don’t have 6000/24 kits, possibly pushing better. A jump from 7ns to 10ns as best case first word latency would be unusual. We normally don’t lose more than 1ns between generations, and it’s usually a wash.

Now, how much that difference matters in the real world is a larger point of debate, and would be very task specific.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65852 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 3:38 pm to
Possibly, DDR6 lands next year for enterprise and not too long after for consumer. Much smaller life span.

Seeing 14000MHz for DDR6 too.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Possibly, DDR6 lands next year for enterprise and not too long after for consumer. Much smaller life span.

Seeing 14000MHz for DDR6 too.


Did the timeline move up? Last I heard (and I haven't looked recently), enterprise was targeting 2025.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65852 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:49 pm to
Yeah I don't count the 2 weeks left in Dec so next year is 2025.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27141 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Yeah I don't count the 2 weeks left in Dec so next year is 2025.


Fair enough. I suppose I was just pointing out the implied difference between "in the next twelve months" and "in the next 24 months".
Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
7981 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 11:29 pm to
I'm looking at upgrading the PC in the near future. CPU and RAM are my 2 biggest needs. Naturally, of course, the MOBO will need an upgrade to LGA1700.

I'm at a crossroads. Should I find an LGA1700 DDR4 and buy a higher end RAM kit or just go with a DDR5 board and buy some middle of the road kit for now? Trying not to break the bank.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram