- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is anyone running a setup with dual Sonos subs?
Posted on 7/9/24 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 7/9/24 at 2:08 pm
Currently contemplating putting a second Gen 3 sub in a theater room and curious if anyone has added a second sub to their setup? If so, how did you position them?

Posted on 7/9/24 at 2:19 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
more than 1 sub is a rather massive rabbit hole if you are really wanting to do it properly. You sure you want to head down this rabbit hole?
The TLDR version is going to be that you will have to buy testing equipment like a calibrated mic (UMIK or similar), learn to use REW to measure sub performance in every location possible (even turning the sub all 4 directions in all locations), and then grinding. You'll have to analyze all the available sub measurements to determine which two locations/orientations actually work together so they dont create peaks/nulls. You WILL get peaks/nulls with multiple subs.
This doesn't even get into the timing delay required on at least one of the subs to help align them.
Are you going to optimize for one listening position or multiple? if you are going for optimizing multiple listening positions you'll also need to learn to use MSO (Multiple sub optimizer) to find the best compromise.
Subs dont just play nice together unfortunately. And if you dont have a way to EQ the subs together, dont even waste your time as you will definitely be wasting money on the 2nd sub and not doubling your output.
The TLDR version is going to be that you will have to buy testing equipment like a calibrated mic (UMIK or similar), learn to use REW to measure sub performance in every location possible (even turning the sub all 4 directions in all locations), and then grinding. You'll have to analyze all the available sub measurements to determine which two locations/orientations actually work together so they dont create peaks/nulls. You WILL get peaks/nulls with multiple subs.
This doesn't even get into the timing delay required on at least one of the subs to help align them.
Are you going to optimize for one listening position or multiple? if you are going for optimizing multiple listening positions you'll also need to learn to use MSO (Multiple sub optimizer) to find the best compromise.
Subs dont just play nice together unfortunately. And if you dont have a way to EQ the subs together, dont even waste your time as you will definitely be wasting money on the 2nd sub and not doubling your output.
Posted on 7/9/24 at 2:23 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
I am because I got a second sub very cheap.
My living room where I live is a bit on the small side, so I’m rocking them on either side of my couch behind my side tables.
I’ve used my subs both in front next to the TV and behind the couch, and generally prefer them behind because of the bass-y rumble adds to the experience for me when watching movies.
My living room where I live is a bit on the small side, so I’m rocking them on either side of my couch behind my side tables.
I’ve used my subs both in front next to the TV and behind the couch, and generally prefer them behind because of the bass-y rumble adds to the experience for me when watching movies.
Posted on 7/9/24 at 3:30 pm to notsince98
quote:
more than 1 sub is a rather massive rabbit hole if you are really wanting to do it properly. You sure you want to head down this rabbit hole?
Even if they're Sonos Subs and you can use Trueplay? I watched this YouTube video that gave a pretty detailed explanation for where the best place to place them is: How to place DUAL Sonos Subs for best bass response
quote:
Are you going to optimize for one listening position or multiple?
I bought a 10'+ Lovesac Sactional (the thing is HUGE) that will be the only seating in the room.
Here's the proposed setup:

It's a large, open 29' x 32' room. The two blue squares are support pillars. On one side of the pillars is a fireplace and couch. On the other side of the pillars is the 120'' projection screen, the giant Lovesac couch (the green rectangle), and the the Sonos Era 300s (the yellow ovals).
I'm thinking the best spot for dual subs would be the where the red boxes are, but they'll be firing into a giant open room, so not sure how well they'll work.
The other option would to be to put the subs diagonal from each other, but then one sub is essentially in the middle of the school next to the 120'' screen.
Posted on 7/9/24 at 3:31 pm to Duckismyspiritanimal
quote:
My living room where I live is a bit on the small side, so I’m rocking them on either side of my couch behind my side tables.
Do you have the opening of the subs facing your couch or the wall?
Posted on 7/9/24 at 6:05 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Even if they're Sonos Subs and you can use Trueplay?
Yes. Sonos cant EQ subs for shite. Nothing really can unless you take the time to find the best locations and time alignment and that is something only you can do yourself as it requires manual measurements. Bass frequencies interact with the room so everything impacts it, especially location and orientation and timing.
Personally, I went down this rabbit hole a couple years ago and really enjoyed it. I found it quite rewarding. Now when I walk into someone's "theater" and there are massive nulls in the bass throughout the room/seating positions I just cringe at all the money wasted to get such mediocre results.
EDIT: Notice in that video you link he is doing exactly what I am saying. he had to find the best locations for the subs using REW before Sonos could do anything useful. EVERY room is different. The spacing between the subs (if you put them on front wall) will probably be heavily impacted by the longest wall dimension. You'll need to test what spacing provides the best combination before letting sonos do its thing.
This post was edited on 7/9/24 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 7/9/24 at 6:43 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
Subs on the same wall is not a good idea. The theory on two subs is that you place them on different walls to reduce standing waves and avoid places in the room where the bass is either too boomy or non-existent. Do a little research and do it right if you want to use two subs. There's a lot to using multiple subs.
The idea is to get clean, even response in the room. Putting two on the same wall will not accomplish that goal.
The idea is to get clean, even response in the room. Putting two on the same wall will not accomplish that goal.
Posted on 7/9/24 at 8:02 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
I have 2 Sonos subs because my room is open and relatively large. It's definitely overkill, but I got a good deal on them and can always repurpose one in the future.
Peter pee should have a YouTube video on placement of dual subs.
Peter pee should have a YouTube video on placement of dual subs.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 2:05 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Subs on the same wall is not a good idea. The theory on two subs is that you place them on different walls to reduce standing waves and avoid places in the room where the bass is either too boomy or non-existent. Do a little research and do it right if you want to use two subs. There's a lot to using multiple subs.
The idea is to get clean, even response in the room. Putting two on the same wall will not accomplish that goal.
Thank you! Unfortunately, I only really have three walls in that setup (the wall behind the couch and the walls on either side of the couch), since the 120'' screen is sort of in the middle of the room. The Peter Pee video I linked to said it's not good to put them on opposite walls facing each other because they may cancel each other out, so that option is off the table.
I went ahead and ordered two since Sonos has a somewhat forgiving return policy, so once the screen is installed next week I'll do a "sub crawl" to see if I can make two subs work in that space. The Peter Pee video mentioned that a good configuration for two subs is to put them diagonal from each other, but that means once sub will be sitting in the middle of the room next to the screen, so without a wall to bounce sound off of, it may not work well.
I guess we'll see!

Posted on 7/10/24 at 2:05 pm to 632627
quote:
I have 2 Sonos subs because my room is open and relatively large. It's definitely overkill, but I got a good deal on them and can always repurpose one in the future.
Where do you have them placed in your room?
Posted on 7/10/24 at 2:39 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
The Peter Pee video I linked to said it's not good to put them on opposite walls facing each other because they may cancel each other out, so that option is off the table.
That is patently false as far as a blanket recommendation. There will be cancelations with every set of locations and orientations depending on where the measurements are taken and at what frequencies. The cancelations will happen at varying frequencies based on the room dimensions.
There is no one standard recommendation that can be given for this. you will need to do the work to do it right or you can just buy it, throw it down and hope for the best.
Start with this. Lets figure out where your room gain will start with the subs. What is the longest wall in your entire space? This will help determine where room gain starts having greatest impact.
EDIT: just saw your comment about doing the sub crawl. That is better than nothing but keep in mind that human ears are variably sensitive to varying frequencies. You might hear something that sounds good at 80Hz but then kill your response at 40Hz. The sub-crawl is a highly inconsistent method but you will at least get to experience the variance throughout the room.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 7/10/24 at 3:36 pm to notsince98
quote:
That is patently false as far as a blanket recommendation.
It's kind of wild because as I did more research after posting, I saw that one of Harman Kardon's recommended placement for dual subs is at the mid-points of sidewalls, facing each other (there's even a whitepaper they did several years ago with all their findings that show this is generally a good placement). After seeing the Harman paper, I did some more research and it seems like other people also state that the mid-points of sidewalls, with the subs facing each other, generally works pretty well. So I guess the Peter Pee video wasn't as helpful as I thought

quote:
you will need to do the work to do it right or you can just buy it, throw it down and hope for the best.
I went ahead and ordered 2 subs so I can play around with them and see if I can make everything sound good.
quote:
What is the longest wall in your entire space? This will help determine where room gain starts having greatest impact.
The wall behind the green "couch" in my little drawing is 28' wide. The distance to the blue "pillars" is about 13' (the screen is going in front of them). The walls running along the sides don't have much usable space for subs since the wall to the North has sliding glass doors and the wall to the South has a hallway to the garage and then an open area leading to stairs going up. However, there is enough space on the North and South walls to place the subs facing each other, slightly in front of the green "couch."
ETA: Based on the configuration of the room, and from what I've read online, it seems like starting with mid-wall configuration is best and then going from there.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 7/10/24 at 5:05 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Where do you have them placed in your room?
One next to the TV and the other diagonal from it and behind my couch.
the YouTube videos I watched said diagonal is the best setup.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 7/11/24 at 8:28 am to Sl0thstronautEsq
Mid-wall only works well for rectangular rooms.
I wasn't asking about wall lengths for usable space. I was asking about it due to room gain. Room gain is where the room structure itself starts amplifying base frequencies. Small rooms get more room gain which means you get more bass amplification at a higher frequency starting point. This usually means you need less sub to get satisfactory results. Larger rooms with longer walls have room gain starting at lower frequencies. My room for example, I dont start seeing room gain until about 18Hz. I needed (2) 18" 3kW low-tuned ported subs to see acceptable output down to 12Hz (I like to feel it and I have concrete floors so it took a lot).
But anyway, wherever your room gain starting frequency is can impact what kind of spacings you want to maintain between subs.
Also, due to SBIR, the most likely orientation for side-firing subs being optimal and easiest to integrate will result in the subs facing the wall. You want to leave about 2" minimum gap between front of sub and the wall for air flow. But this helps eliminate SBIR which can create a lot of sharp cancellations at different frequencies.
I wasn't asking about wall lengths for usable space. I was asking about it due to room gain. Room gain is where the room structure itself starts amplifying base frequencies. Small rooms get more room gain which means you get more bass amplification at a higher frequency starting point. This usually means you need less sub to get satisfactory results. Larger rooms with longer walls have room gain starting at lower frequencies. My room for example, I dont start seeing room gain until about 18Hz. I needed (2) 18" 3kW low-tuned ported subs to see acceptable output down to 12Hz (I like to feel it and I have concrete floors so it took a lot).
But anyway, wherever your room gain starting frequency is can impact what kind of spacings you want to maintain between subs.
Also, due to SBIR, the most likely orientation for side-firing subs being optimal and easiest to integrate will result in the subs facing the wall. You want to leave about 2" minimum gap between front of sub and the wall for air flow. But this helps eliminate SBIR which can create a lot of sharp cancellations at different frequencies.
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 8:30 am
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:32 am to notsince98
quote:
I wasn't asking about wall lengths for usable space. I was asking about it due to room gain.
Ahhh, okay, it's roughly 28' x 28' (not including the hallway, staircase, area, etc.). I'll do some research on room gain!
quote:
Also, due to SBIR, the most likely orientation for side-firing subs being optimal and easiest to integrate will result in the subs facing the wall. You want to leave about 2" minimum gap between front of sub and the wall for air flow. But this helps eliminate SBIR which can create a lot of sharp cancellations at different frequencies.
Okay, that's good to know. I can appreciate the need to give the sub some space from walls to adjust for SBIR, but is it too extreme to put a sub in the middle of a room, far from any walls?
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:10 am to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Okay, that's good to know. I can appreciate the need to give the sub some space from walls to adjust for SBIR, but is it too extreme to put a sub in the middle of a room, far from any walls?
As usual, it all depends. Many enthusiasts will end up with smaller subs located next to seating positions in the middle of the room to help fill in nulls created by the room that they just couldn't otherwise tame. For example, maybe there is a null at 45Hz they can't eliminate with multiple subs around the walls. Sometimes, they will take a smaller sub and put it next to seating and set it up to specifically provide extra output at 45Hz.
The biggest reason to avoid middle room placement is because you dont get corner loading which increases output. So you get more performance keeping it near walls but not everyone needs that.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 6:41 pm to 632627
quote:
I have 2 Sonos subs because my room is open and relatively large. It's definitely overkill
I apologize but as a denizen of the AVS DIY speakers and subs forum that made me giggle. In my main HT I have 16 18" subs in LLT alignment boxes and 2 21" nearfield subs run off 10 Crown XLS2502 amps and would add more if I had more space. I am convinced flat to DC is not impossible though physics says it is.
To the OP:
Kudos for finding the Welti whitepaper it is a good science-based primer for integrating multiple subs. Integrating multiple subs (unless you have something like Dirac or Audyssey and use the Audyssey One Evo scripts from Obsessive Compulsive Audiophile) is a lot of work using as mentioned a calibrated mic and something like REW. The real question is how much control do you actually have with Sonos? If it is simple level, phase and time alignment then there is not a whole lot to say beyond placement.
There are two things helping you out:
1. you only have one row of seating so you aren't trying to get even bass over multiple rows of seats
2. The Sonos "subs" are closer to mid-bass-modules so you don't have to worry about nearly 2 entire octaves of frequencies so it makes it a little less complex.
If you don't want to go the mic and REW route I would suggest getting an SPL meter and playing some test tones and experiment with placement. Don't worry about them "firing into the room" as bass frequencies radiate 360 degrees. I would start without the subs equidistant from the side walls like you have in your diagram and if possible you might try placing them at different heights. There is just not much getting more granular until we know exactly what Sonos software can manipulate.
Posted on 7/12/24 at 7:46 am to Obtuse1
I'll add an old school trick to what Obtuse stated.
One way to place a sub is to install it temporarily in your listening position. Move around your potential sub locations noting which location has the smoothest and best response. i.e., the bass isn't boomy or non-existent. This method is tougher with two subs but as noted those Sonos subs are missing an octave or two on the bottom end which is generally what causes the most trouble with placement.
One way to place a sub is to install it temporarily in your listening position. Move around your potential sub locations noting which location has the smoothest and best response. i.e., the bass isn't boomy or non-existent. This method is tougher with two subs but as noted those Sonos subs are missing an octave or two on the bottom end which is generally what causes the most trouble with placement.
This post was edited on 7/12/24 at 9:22 am
Posted on 7/12/24 at 9:26 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/24 at 8:28 am
Posted on 7/20/24 at 1:23 am to lsuconnman
quote:
Honestly, calling them “subs” should be considered A/V malpractice.
Good ole Anton Hoffman's Iron Law. You can have it low, you can have it small or you can have it efficient. Pick any two. The problem is that the Iron Law constrains engineers but does not constrain the marketing department. I like to think of it as you need big stuff to make big waves.
There is nothing inherently wrong with small what I would refer to as mid-bass-modules, especially for music. If you can reproduce an open E on a standard tuned electric bass (41.2hz) you aren't going to be missing much in music unless you are a pipe organ fan or into a lot of synthetic music with deep bass drops and the like. The BBC engineered a hump into upper bass of some of their monitors like the LS3/5a. That extra weight there gave the illusion of a deeper extension. This is similar to what the Bose bass module and the Sonos Subs do for you.
It is hard to imagine they are tuned any lower than 45-50hz since there is so little volume in the cabinet and they only have a pair of 6" drivers. Their allure is the ease of connection (like all Sonos) and with onboard wireless capability they provide out of the box flexibility. Compared to a conventional setup for the price you could have 2 SVS PB-1000s with enough extra change (with the buy 2 discount) to make 1 of them wireless. The difference in extension and output would be massive. Keep in mind the Sonos has only about .75 cu ft of EXTERIOR volume not counting the hole in the middle, the drivers, amps, ports and bracing. Looking at the exploded view they might have .3 cu ft of internal volume which is less than most 5 1/4" mid-woofer bookshelf speakers. They do excel in form factor, WAF and ease of connectivity which is where Sonos excels in general.
Popular
Back to top
