Started By
Message

.

Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:37 pm
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:37 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/26/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14576 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:53 pm to
Good it should never have been there to begin with, but it won't matter the bribes have cleared already.
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:56 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/26/25 at 4:09 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:12 pm to
Doha is a great city but the rest of the country is a third world shite hole.

Spending a month just in Doha for games would fricking blow bc there is only so much you can do. Part of the WC experience is traveling around to new cities. No way the city has enough infrastructure for that influx of travelers.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
22084 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:22 pm to
I hope they bury all FIFA frickheads that took part in giving it to them in a boo-box in the middle of the desert.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13799 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

No way the city has enough infrastructure for that influx of travelers.

So, in their proposal, the questionnaire asks about whether you have a list of necessary items. They included:

Soccer Stadiums
A large Intl airport
A public transportation system
Interstate highways
A minimum of 150,000 3* hotel rooms
A sewage system
An immigration apparatus to vet and grant tourist visas
An internal security force
Established vendor support services
A population large enough to provide 80,000 volunteers.

And Qatar answered: "No. We do not have any of that stuff. But, LNG prices are gonna stay at $18 forever. So we are gonna spend $1 trillion over the next 10 years and make all of that happen."

And they gave them the tournament.

In the meantime, LNG prices are falling past $8 and they don't have 10% of what they said they would have completed yet.

What could possibly go wrong?

Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32890 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 8:16 pm to
Joke is an understatement here.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 10/7/17 at 9:38 am to
Too hot anyway.
Any excuse will do.
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7696 posts
Posted on 10/7/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

So, in their proposal, the questionnaire asks about whether you have a list of necessary items. They included:

Soccer Stadiums
A large Intl airport
A public transportation system
Interstate highways
A minimum of 150,000 3* hotel rooms
A sewage system
An immigration apparatus to vet and grant tourist visas
An internal security force
Established vendor support services
A population large enough to provide 80,000 volunteers.



That’s a lot of stuff, if only there was somewhere that could do all of that with ease and on really short notice...
Posted by Michael Stein
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
1958 posts
Posted on 10/7/17 at 11:21 pm to
This has been ridiculous from the get-go. My heart breaks for the thousands of slaves who have died and will die constructing all this stuff.

Qatar basically said, " Well, none of this infrastructure actually exists yet, but we'll build several cities, let alone stadiums, for the Workd Cup." What a farce.
Posted by TigerAlumni2010
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4792 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 2:09 am to
I know this is probably way too forward, but with the 2026 bid seemingly going to USA/Mexico/Canada, who would get the 2022 World Cup if FIFA deems Qatar unfit to host and takes the games away?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 3:23 am to
Hopefully Australia or England
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 6:44 am to
quote:

My heart breaks for the thousands of slaves who have died and will die constructing all this stuff.





horseshite
Posted by Michael Stein
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
1958 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 8:08 am to
Huh?

Care to explain the laughter? The "workers" on these stadium projects are basically 21st century slaves. Slavery continues to exist in the Islamic world.

They're brought in from poor countries by the bus load and forced to sign a contract that is promptly torn up. They have no rights. They go unpaid, live in awful tenements, and work all day in the sun with barely any water. They can't leave to go home. Hundreds of them, if not over a thousand by now, have already died. More will continue to die, because FIFA doesn't care. The Qatari government certainly doesn't. Watch the segment ESPN made on it over two years ago. It's an awful situation that need not have happened.
This post was edited on 10/9/17 at 8:12 am
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15273 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

I know this is probably way too forward, but with the 2026 bid seemingly going to USA/Mexico/Canada, who would get the 2022 World Cup if FIFA deems Qatar unfit to host and takes the games away?


If only it wasn't too late to shrug off the free-loaders and get 2022 for ourselves.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
83330 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 12:21 pm to
England could host in a heartbeat
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13799 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:37 am to
quote:

That’s a lot of stuff, if only there was somewhere that could do all of that with ease and on really short notice...

The hands down leader for the 2022 Replacement Cup is England. They are just coming off an Olympics and they have everything they need.

We are getting the 2026 World Cup. It will be the first one with 48 teams. And we will share it with Mexico and Canada. So we aren't eligible for the 2022 event. I honestly hope they go ahead and give it to England. They haven't had one since the 60s or something.

quote:

If only it wasn't too late to shrug off the free-loaders and get 2022 for ourselves.

I think the deal we made was that we would get 2026 if we didn't make a big scene about 2022. I would honestly rather have 2026. It will be a great opportunity to showcase America. And it will be an even more glorious standard once/if Qatar totally screws up their tournament.

I will be 54 years old! My kids will all be in college. Hard to believe.
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 9:50 am
Posted by ColonelTiger88
Nicholls State Fan
Member since Apr 2014
699 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 10:19 am to
But would FIFA want to move the WC to another UEFA country and Russia hosts who is also part of UEFA? The last time Europe hosted back to back was 1954 (Switzerland) and 1958 (Sweden).
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13799 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:15 am to
The only other country that I can think of that would be in a position to host on short notice that is NOT in Europe would be Japan.

But the trend has been for exotic, developing countries. Russia, Brazil, South Africa, Qatar etc. It's time to bring it back to civilization and reward the people (and companies) who actually pay for the games.

Companies like Budweiser, Nikon, Visa, McDonalds, Sony. The all want it in a place with air conditioning and shaved pussy.

It should go England, USA (with Canada and Mexico), Japan or Korea, Germany or Italy, Chile and Argentina (combined).
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 4:59 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 3:41 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram