- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Suarez Gets 9 Games and 4 Month General Ban
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:44 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:44 am to StraightCashHomey21
I said this yesterday but he must have breached some kind of player conduct clause in his new deal. If im Liverpool I say enough is enough after they stuck with him and don't pay him a dime until he comes back.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:50 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:44 am to TFTC
quote:
He may be and if we get a good deal for him, its best for the club and I'll be happy!
That said, what club is going to buy a player this year that can't play the first 2 months?? We won't let him go for peanuts...
Yea his market value just dropped big time
quote:
It’s mixed news for Liverpool fans, with plenty fearing they might lose their star man this summer as interest in his services appeared to be cranking up. However, for both on and off-field reasons, it now seems unlikely that either Barcelona or Real Madrid would be willing to stump up the sort of money required to convince Liverpool to sell, but the Reds will have to play almost a quarter of the season without their leading marksman
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:46 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:48 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
don't pay him a dime until he comes back.
I don't have an issue with that...
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:51 am to TFTC
do you have an issue with paying him?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:56 am to PTBob
If the club has the right to withhold paying him while he is suspended, due to breach of contract, then I don't have a problem with it...
edit: at £200k/wk, thats a lot of money that could be useful elsewhere. He can only blame himself.
I read where Adidas and 888bet (I think thats them) are considering their options in sponsorship deals... they'd be silly not to..
edit: at £200k/wk, thats a lot of money that could be useful elsewhere. He can only blame himself.
I read where Adidas and 888bet (I think thats them) are considering their options in sponsorship deals... they'd be silly not to..
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:59 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:57 am to PTBob
So he positively can't appeal for the World Cup remaining matches?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:57 am to PTBob
It would be stupid to sell Suarez unless Madrid pays a Madrid price for him. You bring him in late October and let him dominate again. I really do not see any reason to sell him. He is well worth the risk and there is almost no way Liverpool could get the same quality with his transfer fee. You would be selling arguably the third best player in the world. Good luck replacing that.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:57 am to PTBob
It would be stupid to sell Suarez unless Madrid pays a Madrid price for him. You bring him in late October and let him dominate again. I really do not see any reason to sell him. He is well worth the risk and there is almost no way Liverpool could get the same quality with his transfer fee. You would be selling arguably the third best player in the world. Good luck replacing that.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:04 am to GeauxAggie972
quote:
I understand FIFA governs everything, but it would be stupid to cause harm to a team that he wasn't even playing for at the time of the incident
Don't understand this logic. Why is it fair to punish Uruguay then but not Liverpool, just because he was playing for them? It's not like his teammates told him to bite someone or did anything wrong. If you don't want to harm people who weren't involved, then you can never suspend anyone for anything, you just have to fine them a lot of money or something. Or you just have to accept the fact that an individual's poor choice can have negative consequences for others who didn't do anything wrong (both Uruguay and Liverpool in this case).
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 10:05 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:16 am to Buckeye Fan 19
posted in the comments section of skysports
this Liverpool fan gets it

this Liverpool fan gets it
quote:
I have said this before & will say it again - I do not want Luis Suarez ever to be seen wearing an LFC shirt again. My wish is for LFC to sell him immediately & if the club I have supported for nearly 50 years does not get on with it, then I want all of the club's sponsors to push them into doing it. The sale price is irrelevant next to losing all sponsorship income, so just do a deal with whoever wants him. Absolute genius with a football, but this inbuilt mentality of biting people is just not acceptable in society. Two year olds get told it is not right & they are stopped from doing it, this man has to be made to realise it is not appropriate behaviour. LFC have backed him, tried to cure him & failed, so it is time to move on. There will be many other supremely gifted footballers pulling on the LFC shirt after he is gone. Sorry Luis, but you are going to have to walk alone now after this.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:22 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
Don't understand this logic. Why is it fair to punish Uruguay then but not Liverpool, just because he was playing for them? It's not like his teammates told him to bite someone or did anything wrong. If you don't want to harm people who weren't involved, then you can never suspend anyone for anything, you just have to fine them a lot of money or something. Or you just have to accept the fact that an individual's poor choice can have negative consequences for others who didn't do anything wrong (both Uruguay and Liverpool in this case).
Well, his previous two bans at club level didn't apply to international play...
I get it, I accept it, but I don't have to agree with and/or like it...
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:41 am to Bho
Is this more of a perception priblem?
A true bite where you take a plug out would be a huge problem.
But why is a nip ( about like a pinch ) worse that a thrown elbow to the temple? Its all about optics imho.
Evryone that plsys against him should wear shoulder pads.
A true bite where you take a plug out would be a huge problem.
But why is a nip ( about like a pinch ) worse that a thrown elbow to the temple? Its all about optics imho.
Evryone that plsys against him should wear shoulder pads.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:41 am to S.E.C. Crazy
Well, Sunderland can frick right off 
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:24 pm to Bho
quote:
ETA:Unreal how they punish his club worse than his Country.
Anyone who chooses to be associated with this clown deserves whatever punishment he incurs for them.
LOL at all the Liverpool fans who cried all year about how he was such a changed man and how wonderful he was for kicking a ball at a park with a handicapped child.
Ballack, as always, on the mark. This POS is sub-human.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
I wonder how much they support him now b/c he basically cost them winning the league and going far in Europe.
How do you figure this? He will miss like half the group stage.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:28 pm to RandySavage
quote:
How do you figure this? He will miss like half the group stage.
3 UCL games and wont play an EPL game until almost November
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:29 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Been out of town, hopefully you've been holding it down while I was away. Is it even worth needling the Pool fans or have they all finally resigned themselves to the fact Suarez is the biggest POS in sports like the rest of us already knew?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:30 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
3 UCL games
Pool will still be favored to get out of their group I would think with or without him unless they get a really cruel draw.
Popular
Back to top


1






