Started By
Message

re: Open Letter to ESPN re: World Cup

Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:07 am to
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46239 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:07 am to
quote:

If anything, the ratings I posted show that the vast majority of fans would rather watch Mexico than watch soccer period.


But the point is you cant prove the dont watch soccer when it is on ESPN for example.
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:07 am to
this entire argument is a red herring.

soccer is becoming more popular in this country. citizenship doesn't define geographical interests. populations, legal or illegal do. and knowing that some radical immigration policy likely won't be implemented, that means that immigrant populations will continue to rise inexorably and garner interests from markets.

imo, with more exposure, us precious affluent white americans will see more of our peers gravitating toward the sport given more enthusiasm and media ubiquity.

This post was edited on 6/3/10 at 11:08 am
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46239 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Why aren't legal immigrants a part of your point?


They are my entire point
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46239 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:09 am to
quote:

soccer is becoming more popular in this country


And illegal immigration skews this even though it still is happening.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39157 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:10 am to
quote:

But the point is you cant prove the dont watch soccer when it is on ESPN for example.


Dude, everything you've said in this thread can't be proved. At least I'm doing the research, unlike you who is spouting off without knowing what he's talking about.

The ratings for these games on ESPN are usually less than 1.0. That's a pretty significant gap between the Spanish speaking stations and ESPN. Of course there is some overlap, but the people watching Mexico soccer more than likely are not crossing over to watch soccer on ESPN. That is the only conclusion I can draw, thus your point about illegal immigrants skewing TV ratings is negligible.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Baloo, I think the some of the sentiment against other sports shown by soccer fans stems from a defensive stance that many soccer fans have to constantly take for their sport. No other sports fan in America (outside of maybe NASCAR) has to constantly deflect criticism like soccer fans. If a person meets another guy who is a huge hockey fan, the non-hockey fan probably won't diatribe against hockey because it's an established sport. I've encountered several people who feel like bashing soccer is acceptable because they feel like they have the false pretense of the backing of the American sports fan.
I disagree about your characterization of non-hockey fans, but I do understand the siege mentality. I like a lot of "second tier" sports like lacrosse, cycling, college baseball, soccer, and hockey. And I've long since stopped caring whether anyone else likes the sports I do. As long as its on my TV, I'm happy. Actually, a lack of a massive following is a positive, as there are less idiot fans. Most people who follow second tier sports have to put in a lot of effort to follow it, so they tend to be quite knowledgable.

Soccer fans are the most defensive. I understand the defensiveness and I completely agree that morons just jumping in to insult the sport are infuriating. But the proper response is NOT to then act like them and talk about how the sport they like is stupid, too. That is precisely the wrong tact.
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13140 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:12 am to
quote:

They are my entire point


Yeah, but you keep writing illegal. First of all, I don't really get what you're trying to have everyone understand, but besides that, I don't get why you keep saying illegal immigrants instead of just immigrants.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46239 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:12 am to
quote:

thus your point about illegal immigrants skewing TV ratings is negligible.


So you can throw out one number and thus my point is negligible? The point is illegal immigrants skew the ratings
This post was edited on 6/3/10 at 11:13 am
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13140 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:14 am to
quote:

And illegal immigration skews this even though it still is happening.


See, there you go again. He didn't say soccer is becoming more popular to Americans. He said that soccer is becoming more popular in this country, but you still wrote the skewing thing again.
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I don't really get what you're trying to have everyone understand


he's using abysmal logic that increased popularity doesnt count because of citizenship status. nevermind the fact that those people are here to stay and will multiply in successive generations.
This post was edited on 6/3/10 at 11:15 am
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:15 am to
quote:



But the point is you cant prove the dont watch soccer when it is on ESPN for example.

Isn't it somewhat hypocritical to ask people to provide links and data to back their arguments but you can't provide any yourself to back your points?

For the record, I think that you are correct that the large influx of hispanic immigrants (illegal or not) does positively impact soccer TV ratings as well as attendance at SOME MLS games. But I still feel that soccer is becoming a much more popular sport in the US. Just look at high schools and colleges that have added soccer programs since the 1994 World Cup (and no, I don't have hard numbers). In Baton Rouge, drive down Burbank past the soccer fields in late winter...you'll see a significant number of people out playing and watching the soccer games.

As far as the leading attendance figures in the MLS, I would wager that part of the reason that Seattle and Philly lead the league in attendance is because they are two of the newest teams. This is Seattle's 2nd year (I believe) and the first for Philly.


But I enjoy watching soccer on TV. Primarily, the World cup and some of the European leagues. I will watch the MLS on occassion.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39157 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:15 am to
quote:

So you can throw out one number and thus my point is negligible?


You moron, if soccer TV ratings haven't increased in any noticeable way in the past ten years, how can you defend the position that illegal immigration is in part "skewing" the numbers? Please explain that to me. There isn't any skewing going on. Illegal immigrants are watching Spanish speaking stations along with other recent Spanish immigrants. They are not likely to cross over to ESPN to watch soccer, or else they probably would have done so.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39157 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I would wager that part of the reason that Seattle


Very long soccer history in the upper northwest.

quote:

Philly


Lobbied the MLS hard for a team.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Very long soccer history in the upper northwest.


Philly
Lobbied the MLS hard for a team.

Both points are well-taken, especially since Portland and Vancouver are getting MLS franchises (which are existing franchises from other leagues). But I still think that part of the reason the attendance for both are so high is due to a "honeymoon" period. Nevertheless, I think both teams will do well in the following years.
This post was edited on 6/3/10 at 11:23 am
Posted by Mr. Shankly
Redding and Marshall Rd
Member since Aug 2004
5551 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:24 am to
dear lord, i'm having flashbacks of Zach running a similar thread about four years ago (maybe Euros two years ago)
if you don't like it change the fricking channel!!surely there's some Neckcar event or Bill Dance bloopers show on CMT...why start a thread if for something you don't care for?
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
23905 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:25 am to
quote:

So you can throw out one number and thus my point is negligible? The point is illegal immigrants skew the ratings


And your point is wrong. Illegal immigrants don't skew ratings in any significant way.

See that's a statement made with nothing to back it up except anecdotal evidence and my own common sense and "logic".

Now prove me wrong!

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39157 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:27 am to
I've been always of the opinion that the MLS should have promoted already existing amateur teams rather than create new teams. This is the way the J-league in Japan has done it, and in nearly the same time frame, they are averaging nearly twenty-thousand fans per match. That's why I expect the new clubs, Vancouver, Portland and Montreal to have high attendance, since there is an existing infrastructure in place.

While these honeymoon periods exist, considering how hard Philly and Seattle lobbied for pro franchises, I expect they will lead the league in attendance for years to come.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52746 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:27 am to
quote:

why start a thread if for something you don't care for?
fat-headed rednecks love to bitch about furriners
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465368 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:27 am to
quote:

he's using abysmal logic that increased popularity doesnt count because of citizenship status. nevermind the fact that those people are here to stay and will multiply in successive generations.

yeah but they're not REAL americans

hell, i can barely call them humans at this point
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13140 posts
Posted on 6/3/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

if you don't like it change the fricking channel!


There's actually no reason for the anti-soccer people to get their panties in a wad. The games will be over by 3:30 everyday. The only complaints should be for commercials and a little extra SportsCenter time.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram