- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Match Day Thread - 8/25
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:50 am to LSUtiger17
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:50 am to LSUtiger17
Kind of divey. Many here would have called that a dive, were it another league, and-or player.
Pretty good no call, but that defender is pretty dodgey.
Maybe not dive, I guess embellished or accentuated, would be the better descriptor.
Pretty good no call, but that defender is pretty dodgey.
Maybe not dive, I guess embellished or accentuated, would be the better descriptor.
This post was edited on 8/25/13 at 10:51 am
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:51 am to americanoutlaw
quote:
City looking pretty rough at the end of the half. Fernandinho is not playing well and we aren't getting it to Navas when he's had more space on the wing.
How's Dzeko looked? I read a stat that they've only had 3 shots.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:51 am to SwaggerCopter
quote:
I would have felt bad about it, but he was in fact standing in the box when he was clearly fouled.
Yep.
This has been a pretty good game, both teams have some really good players in the midfield. Paulinho is really impressive, imo.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:51 am to SwaggerCopter
this sounds dumb, but it doesnt matter in that situation. in theory, it "should have" been a penalty, but the ref did a good job to place it outside the box. no one wants to award a penalty for that, refs do that shite all the time.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:53 am to LSUtiger17
Dzeko has been ok, had a chance for a header in the goal. He had a good pass from Yaya Toure that looked promising but just missed getting his foot on it.
Overall, City looks a little rougher than I was expecting.
Overall, City looks a little rougher than I was expecting.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:53 am to rockchlkjayhku11
Cardiff have been very compact and crowding out dzeko. He's had two guys on him most times and not received that much service
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:53 am to rockchlkjayhku11
Shelvey has shown this half why I think it was a good decision to sell him...
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:55 am to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:plus one. Many on this board, don´t get this concept.
this sounds dumb, but it doesnt matter in that situation. in theory, it "should have" been a penalty, but the ref did a good job to place it outside the box. no one wants to award a penalty for that, refs do that shite all the time.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:55 am to rockchlkjayhku11
There is not "in theory". It's in the damn rule book. If he blew his whistle for a foul, it should be a PK. No question about it.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 10:56 am to pvilleguru
it would be kind of ridiculous to give them a goal for a light foul way the hell out there regardless of the exact interpretation of the rulebook.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:00 am to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:
it would be kind of ridiculous to give them a goal for a light foul way the hell out there regardless of the exact interpretation of the rulebook.
Maybe but my stance is generally that everyone knows a foul anywhere in the box, according to the rules, is a PK. Don't take the chance of committing a foul, especially if they aren't in a goal scoring position when inside the box. Even more, don't body check someone in the box while also missing the ball.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:00 am to pvilleguru
The penalty rule is flawed though, and a lot of refs recognize that. If players were called for fouls in the box on defending balls in the air with the same zeal they were when defending balls in the air outside of the box there would be like 5 pk's a game. Pk's have such an exaggerated impact on games, no one wants to see them given on plays that were never going to result in a goal
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:02 am to svb
It wouldn't bother me at all to see a penalty given there. If you're going to be a fricking moron then you've got to deal with the consequences. It was obviously a foul.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:02 am to svb
quote:
Paulinho is really impressive, imo.
It's taking some getting used to. I first thought that Paulinho had a bad first touch. Turns out he just knows that his first touch should be aggressive, something nobody did last year. I don't mind him losing it every once in a while in order to do this.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:03 am to Crede15
quote:
If you're going to be a fricking moron then you've got to deal with the consequences
My position in a more succinct form.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:03 am to tigerfan88
The rule may be flawed, but as a ref myself, then his job is to call the game according to the rule book. We don't make the laws, we just enforce them.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:05 am to pvilleguru
when i reffed, i considered it my job not to ruin games when i didnt have to.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:07 am to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:Agreed.
when i reffed, i considered it my job not to ruin games when i didnt have to.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:11 am to Dandy Lion
it's a differing of opinions and it's fair to see it differently. it probably goes back to how individuals view penalties and even referees in general.
Posted on 8/25/13 at 11:12 am to Dandy Lion
Absolutely cannon blast by dzeko to open his account for the season. 
Popular
Back to top



1





