Started By
Message

re: How would you feel if the World Cup was rotated between these countries only

Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34852 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:47 pm to
Remove Mexico, Argentina, and the Netherlands and sure.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Has England or Italy ever hosted?



Italy's hosted twice, England once.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126606 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Has England or Italy ever hosted?



um yes
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

2018 is going to be a shite show
Can't wait to be there in person to witness it.
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:18 pm to
duh, that's not the point. 5 year and a billion bucks would easily have 10+ 40,000 seat stadium in literally our poorest and worst states on so many levels.

plus I think the casualty list would be significantly lower.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 6:19 pm
Posted by NOTORlOUSD
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2010
5051 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

If given 5 years to renovate, Alabama and Mississippi could host a world cup.

Just stadiums - yes; other infrastructure like airports, hotels, and transit - no
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66608 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:23 pm to
They should rotate between continents IMO.

USA / Mexico
Europe
South America
Asia

Keep the group games in the same general area to minimize travel.

For instance group A plays games in Portland, Seattle, California. Group B in Dallas, Houston, Mexico.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

-joint Japan/s. Korea


I agree that Asia needs to be represented. (Not sure why the OP left it out). But could you get these two countries to do something in tandem? Don't they still kind of hate each other from shite that went down way back in WWII?

Also, I kind of doubt FIFA would go with a set rotation. Aren't they kind of like the NFL where they extort, er I mean bid out the location based on stuff like what area builds stadiums, gives financial incentives, etc.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 8:49 pm
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:49 pm to
They co-hosted in 2002.
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

If given 5 years to renovate, Alabama and Mississippi could host a world cup.

Let that sink in Qatar.

Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8334 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:28 pm to
I was in South Africa in 2010 and they did a pretty awesome job.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51400 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

They should rotate between continents IMO.
This has always been the intention.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15941 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 12:59 am to
quote:

Don't have the facilities and never will. It's like saying have the World Cup in Florida. But smaller



Yea. No way the US was losing out on the bid to host the World Cup in 2022 to fricking Qatar

Wait.......
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175837 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 1:11 am to
quote:

Has England ever hosted?

How do you think they actually won it once?
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 1:16 am to
I've always thought Australia would make a good host. It may help boost the country's soccer status like the WC did for the US back in 94. (I know they don't have as many sports as America does, but domestic soccer is still a good ways behind behind rugby and Aussie Rules.)
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 1:18 am
Posted by NOLAbaby
CumTown
Member since Sep 2013
1758 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 1:29 am to
Australia would be sweet too
Posted by Alan Garner
thigh-land
Member since Oct 2009
3433 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 1:39 am to
quote:

Very shitty thread, as per your quality. You are an absolute idiot, especially when it comes to soccer. You bring nothing to the board and fail to understand even simple things. frick off.


Albeit it was a dumb thread but you are an angry little man aren't you? fricks sake.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126606 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 2:18 am to
quote:

5 year and a billion bucks would easily have 10+ 40,000 seat stadium in literally our poorest and worst states on so many levels.



Then those stadiums go to waste after and end up looking like shite. Your post is stupid on so many levels.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126606 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 2:19 am to
quote:

Can't wait to be there in person to witness it.



Hope you don't get kidnapped
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126606 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 2:20 am to
quote:

For instance group A plays games in Portland, Seattle, California. Group B in Dallas, Houston, Mexico.



Portland and Houston wouldn't host anyway

Mexico
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram