Started By
Message

re: How high can mid size EPL clubs really go?

Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:03 am to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:03 am to
At least the EPL is competitive unlike other leagues where the rich really do get richer.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 9:25 am to
So'ton has a decent amount of money for a midtable club, right? Maybe they can get into Europa or win a domestic cup...hold onto their core...and you could be talking about the next Everton, with a better chance (still small) of actually breaking into the Big Six.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 9:35 am to
Everton's success this year is buttressed on three loan signings. They have to replace those players. Southampton has a youth academy that is producing first team players some of whom will fetch a lot of money in the transfer market. Thus Southampton has more potential, though Everton might be the bigger club. That's why I think The Saints are better positioned for a top four run.
This post was edited on 4/28/14 at 9:36 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481226 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Everton's success this year is buttressed on three loan signings.

2 of which are supposed to be stars for their home club (or in lukaku's case, another major club after mo quits on him)
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45206 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:01 am to
Salary Cap comes to mind...
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43589 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:04 am to
Aston Villa has a loooong way till we are Champions League ready. I don't see it happening as long as we have current ownership that is unwilling to sign expensive players.

AVFC is a relatively large club that still is light years behind the big boys of the EPL.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

2 of which are supposed to be stars for their home club (or in lukaku's case, another major club after mo quits on him)



Yeah you hardly get loan signings the quality of Lukaku, Barry, and Deuleofeu. Amazing work by Everton to get them but unless they get signings of the same quality then I can see them struggle just a bit next season.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9753 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 10:43 am to
I agree that Southampton is better poised to make a top four run. However, I'd also say that in the sense of 100:1 type odds. This season probably was much more open than most with new managers at City and Chelsea and ManU being down.
There's also good reason that they were able to get an Osvaldo type talent in the market. Roma would have moved him at almost any price, the 6 or so Juve are offering them seems about right for the huge risk / headache he is.
My point being it speaks less to their ability to bring in a top talent and more to the way they'll need to overpay for risky players.





Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481226 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 11:08 am to
i had no clue defou was on everton until a month or so ago. blew my mind. 2 years ago he was supposed to be another messi

and obviously lukaku is special...and the most expensive position on the field
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
21061 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 11:19 am to
Did Lallana, Lambert, Rodriguez and Shaw all come through Southampton's youth ranks?
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5435 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Aston Villa has a loooong way till we are Champions League ready. I don't see it happening as long as we have current ownership that is unwilling to sign expensive players.


And yet under O'neill we spent alot of money but choked 4th place away 3 years in a row. If we get CL football then we keep Milner, Downing, BAry Young etc. who knows maybe he decides to buy Falcao instead of Heskey .

Mid table teams go in cycles, splash a bit of cahs hope to get into Europe, but if it doesnt work after a while they blow it up, sell their players to make their money back and wait a few years before going again.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
173831 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 11:37 am to
i believe so.

that leeds team had great chemistry and the core of bowyer, radebe, martyn, kelly, harte, kewell, smith, matteo and batty had played together for severla years.

then they brought in guys like viduka, dacourt, robbie keane on loan, danny mills, eirik bakke and they took it to the next level. smith, kewell, paul robinson, woodgate all came from the acadamy.

the next crop was just as promising but unfortunately we didn't get to enjoy their development due to the subsequent downfall of the club. (milner, lennon, kilgallon, danny rose, delph, etc.) and the more recent group (howson, garbutt, bradley johnson)

hopefully we can keep hold of and develop sam byram, alex mowatt, lewis walters, ross killock and the next wave of talent.

southampton has a great academy. west ham's seems to have fallen off a tad. everton has done well with the rodwell and barkley most recently. i know there are a couple other youngsters they are high on. i guess we shouldnt count coleman since he had already played at the top level in ireland but they signed him at a relatively young age.

man united and arsenal have had some impressive youngsters that just flame out because they dont get a chance to really make a breakthrough and just wither away at smaller clubs. arturo lupoli FTW
This post was edited on 4/28/14 at 11:38 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

My point being it speaks less to their ability to bring in a top talent and more to the way they'll need to overpay for risky players.



Well they only way they can actually mount a top four challenge is to have a player who is capable of transcendent moments. The only players who are capable of that are young players that haven't been bought yet and players who flamed out at bigger clubs due to either injury or attitude.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9753 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:24 pm to
I agree.

That's why I think it's extremely unlikely they could make a top 4 challenge without a truly massive spending spree.

The EPL has more competition between loaded sides for the CL spots but it's not that likely a Southampton is really going to attain a CL spot in any top 4 league.


Look at a Fiorentina, for example, who've done a great job in building a very good sides for two seasons and still haven't secured a CL spot. Injuries this year played a part but they were out of the top 3 even before those. They'll likely be passed by the Milans in coming seasons as well.

My point is that non-prestige or clubs without a sugar daddy owner don't stand much chance even if they do everything the right way in any of the top 4 leagues.

This post was edited on 4/28/14 at 9:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram