Started By
Message

Explain to a non-soccer person: Why does offsides exist in soccer?

Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:07 am
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26376 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:07 am
I am not a big soccer person but I do not understand why offsides exists in soccer, can anyone tell me the reason why it exists?

I just don't understand why an offensive player is limited to where the defensive players are playing and is at the mercy of the defensive players when moving upfield.

It's like in basketball. Yeah a player can sit back and cherry pick, but is putting his defense at a disadvantage having to play 5-on-4 against the offensive opposition, so that's why players generally don't cherry pick

Same with soccer. If a player wants to hang out on his side of the field near his team's goal, why can't he? Or if he wants to run down the field past the other team's defenders, why can't he do so?
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23750 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:08 am to
it's a good rule that needs instant replay if a score is waived
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:08 am to
quote:

cherry picking
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26376 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:09 am to
quote:

cherry picking


I understand cherry picking as a reason but couldn't they modify it to where a player isn't penalized for being a step ahead of the defense like the US player just was?
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:11 am to
he was onside, that was a bad call.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61617 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:14 am to
quote:

it's a good rule that needs instant replay if a score is waived


This
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
33034 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:15 am to
Offsides is a good rule when it is correctly applied. Otherwise, it would begin to look like the 1940s and 1950s games where teams just launched the ball across the field, kind of like hail marys over and over.

Of course when it is applied incorrectly, it is a terrible rule, and that's what you saw today.
Posted by Diddles
LA
Member since Apr 2013
6981 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:16 am to
Yep there needs to instant replay
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:17 am to
It also opens up the field for play between the boxes.

Think of it like American football. What stops a wide receiver from standing past the safeties at the start of the play? The line of scrimmage.

The offsides rule allows for an ever-changing line of scrimmage. Without it, soccer would just be big goons kicking it down the field to other big goons near the goal.
Posted by LSUTigers1986
Member since Mar 2014
1336 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:17 am to
Good luck ever getting that to happen. It took 1,000 years to get the goal line review.
Posted by svb
Missouri Fan
Member since Jun 2012
3127 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:18 am to
same reason there is offsides in hockey and football
Posted by mrbug708
Member since Jun 2010
237 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:18 am to
*offside
Posted by Diddles
LA
Member since Apr 2013
6981 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:19 am to
It's essentially the same thing except in both of those sports there is a set line.
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
37017 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 12:20 am to
quote:


It's like in basketball. Yeah a player can sit back and cherry pick, but is putting his defense at a disadvantage having to play 5-on-4 against the offensive opposition, so that's why players generally don't cherry pick


It's not like basketball though. It's not 5 on 5, and the field of play is incredibly larger.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91750 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 1:57 am to
If there was no offside it would force the defense to play way back in their half of the field. The game would suck. The middle would be wide open but teams would just park their defense in the 18. Plus you can only be offside on the opponents half. Just giving the defense a fair shot, and the ability to push forward without getting punished. Now teams with fast players will destroy teams that play a high line, but its a risk you take.
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19699 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 6:27 am to
I don't understand why football teams don't just line their wide receivers up in the end zone.

Why make them run past the defenders? You could just throw the ball up into the end zone over and over until somebody catches a touchdown.
Posted by Joe Blow
Member since Nov 2007
2640 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:01 am to
This should help.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Explain to a non-soccer person: Why does offsides exist in soccer?



This guy would be the GOAT if the rule didn't exist

Posted by Wait For It...
Member since Jun 2012
3542 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

same reason there is offsides in hockey and football


I don't know why people never give hockey a hard time. Their rule is far more strange... to me.
Posted by VanRIch
Wherever
Member since Sep 2007
11820 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 9:27 am to
Basketball is much more dependent on everyone playing defense than strikers getting back to play defense. You have 5 players in much tighter space, so the 5 vs 4 is clearly more impactful than 10 vs 9 in a huge area. Can't compare those two at all IMO. The whole way the defense plays would be different. The offsides trap is one of the best tactics in soccer. You risk stepping up at the right moment to either get the offsides or give the player a great run. Taking offsides away severely dumbs down the game.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram