Started By
Message

re: Donovan chose the Galaxy over United. Manchester United.

Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:16 pm to
I don't think anyone cited his progression or development. He obviously has to do what he thinks is best for him but it's pretty disappointing the first American to ever have a meaningful role on a team with a viable chance at trophies turns down the opportunity to represent the US on the biggest stage. I would prefer him to show more ambition and competitiveness.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

I would prefer him to show more ambition and competitiveness.


Classic!
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45206 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:21 pm to
Wouldnt even be a spot starter imo. They just brought in Zaha for right side depth. Landy would rot at Old Trafford.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:24 pm to
You would prefer Liverpool to win a trophy over the US winning the wc ya fricking douche. Got any more red herrings about his ceiling?
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19699 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:53 pm to
I think it's more important that Donovan stay in MLS, to prove to Jurgen that he is better than Graham Zusi.




















Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Donovan is a fruit loop crossed with a corn flake.

- 5 for fighting gets me hyped
- Hey check out this pic of me making out with a water fountain
- Soccer? I quit. No wait, well maybe. No wait, I'm back
- Man U and an EPL title... meh

You forgot

- Hell to the yeah! I just banged in a PK against fricking world beater Cuba. I´m psyched out of my mind!















Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13529 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

“I’m not going to comment on specific conversations I may have had with David in the past, but…we’ll say I had talks with some very high profile teams in England, how’s that?”


Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:24 pm to
OK guys check out a possibility guys.

MU aren't going to sign an 31 year old guy to anymore than a 2 year contract and Donovan wouldn't have made the move until after the MLS playoffs anyway.

So why not just sign a multi year deal with L.A. and go over in Jan. and help Moyes , M.U. gets a little help during Moyes transition , Donovan gets to stay in shape.

It is obvious that Klinsman wants Demps and Donovan to play somewhere this W.C. year during the MLS off season.

Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9292 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:35 pm to
Donovan is 31 years old he's not going to progress anymore as a player. For guys like him and Dempsey this season is all about getting prepared mentally and physically. He's comfortable in LA and if he thinks that's the best place for him to get that preparation who are we to judge. Besides who would choose to live in Manchester over Los Angeles, plus he'd have to deal with a bunch of weird Euros. Not to mention the Galaxy is HIS team while at Man U he's just another sub
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Rofl at this thread.

There is no inherent answer to the situation. At his age, his progression is going to be minimal. He doesn't need to "push" himself. It's all mental at this point. He needs to be in a comfortable environment where he can focus on his game and get mentally prepared for the WC. If he feels like LA is the place for that, then it was the right decision.

A loan is one thing, a permanent move is an entirely different animal.

How dare you bring logic and rationality into this thread.

quote:

So why not just sign a multi year deal with L.A. and go over in Jan. and help Moyes , M.U. gets a little help during Moyes transition , Donovan gets to stay in shape.

I'll tell you why: because Arena is going to lose him for much of the Summer with the WC, so he doesn't also want to lose him for the months prior to that.

Now if it was a short loan, say through March, maybe. Still not sure it would happen. Donovan probably doesn't want to risk an injury in a tougher league against hack happy English defenders who want to show the 'murican a ting or two.
This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 2:50 pm
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:48 pm to
Very few people itt even suggested Donovan needed to move to improve his game. I think most people would just be happy to see him play week in and week out on one of the best teams in the world. LSUBEAST and yourself are making asinine assumptions.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9292 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:50 pm to
Well a lot of people were saying it was a stupid decision by Donovan, which doesn't really make sense
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I think most people would just be happy to see him play week in and week out on one of the best teams in the world.

What makes you think he would play week in and week out? And don't give me Carling Cup bull shite.

quote:

He told reporters he heavily weighted which place would give him the best shot at cementing his USMNT starting role for the upcoming World Cup. Given what he said after that about United, it probably means Moyes was unable to promise him significant minutes at Old Trafford, again something that’s not entirely surprising.

You know how I know that you're dumb?

Jesus, at least read the article first
This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 2:56 pm
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

it's pretty disappointing the first American to ever have a meaningful role on a team with a viable chance at trophies turns down the opportunity to represent the US on the biggest stage


Oh, has Donovan not already done enough, in your opinion, for U.S. soccer?

Now he has to move, at 31, to a place he doesn't want to live and probably won't play much just so you can watch for him on Saturday mornings?

I would love for him to PLAY at ManU too, but it's silly to fault him for not going based on the idea that he's slacking off on a chance to advance U.S. soccer.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

You know how I know that you're dumb?

Jesus, at least read the article first


In all honesty, and I'm not trying to be devisive here. what % of Man U signings are guaranteed regular playing time. I'd bet it's >5%.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

I think most people would just be happy to see him play week in and week out on one of the best teams in the world.

So you admit this wouldn't actually happen.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

So you admit this wouldn't actually happen.


Not at all. As I've said, when you look at Valencia's current form and Zaha's youth and inexperience, I do think Donovan could have positioned himself for some regular playing time.

I know most of the Man U fans OTB will say CM is the weakest spot right now, but in terms of actual on the field performance it's been the RW. They need help there, Donovan might have been able to provide that.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Very few people itt even suggested Donovan needed to move to improve his game. I think most people would just be happy to see him play week in and week out on one of the best teams in the world. LSUBEAST and yourself are making asinine assumptions.


This is great. I love shite like this.

I can't wait to hear what assumptions I've made, and I do want to hear them, but while I wait I will gladly point out the assumptions you, and others, are making.

Before I list them, however, you must understand that they are all linked together to compile into one big assumption.

#1 That Donovan would actually get enough playing time to justify leaving LA.

#2 That Manchester United want him for his talent, rather than his marketability.

#3 That Donovan gives a frick about what the move to MU would mean for state of US Soccer.

#4 (and the culmination of them all) That Donovan's move to MU can only have a positive effect on him and the US.

The way I see it, it's not a risk worth taking in a WC season. Next year maybe you have an argument. But moving to MU means he has to fight with other top top talent to play. He already is pretty mentally fragile as is. What happens when he doesn't see the field? Or only plays as a sub or in league cup matches? What will that do for his confidence going in to the WC?
Posted by svb
Missouri Fan
Member since Jun 2012
3127 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:41 pm to
How dare he do what he felt was best for him!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

How dare he do what he felt was best for him!!!!!!!!!!!!


where in this thread have I condemned Donovan and his decision?

Just yesterday, I posted that Landon needs to do what makes Landon happy.
This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 3:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram