- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: could the World Cup be pulled from Qatar?
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:32 pm to UASports23
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:32 pm to UASports23
quote:
I'm sure they'd change it for the WC.
without a doubt.
If we did host the world cup again, would the final be in LA again?
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:33 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
A mexico wolrd cup match in Cowboys Stadium in Arlington would easily sell out, thats ~90000
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:36 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
College stadiums would be terrible IMO. One, most of the stadiums actually suck dick. I would not want to have an old, decrepit, piss-smelling, stadium with metal bleachers to host World Cup games. We would look like a shite country.
Of course, the logistics would be incredibly difficult, if not impossible. The college towns are way too small and you need to be in major/semi-major cities for shite to do outside of the games itself. Furthermore, there are not nearly enough places to stay.
Concur. But, if LA hosted . .I guess it'd be at the Rose Bowl. I highly doubt they'd use Home Depot Center. It only holds 27,000
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:38 pm to UASports23
Not in a huge city, but the Arizona Cardinals stadium would be a great site for a match, if it hasn't been mentioned already. Grass, state-of-the-art...
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:39 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
Bham
Doubt these would be in the choices, but I could be wrong.
For whatever reason US Soccer used to love to come to Bham. I think Ole Bruce had a mistress here or something.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:42 pm to AUin02
rednecks scare the messicans away?
for real though, I wish rednecks would be more into international soccer, Mexico-US games would be so much more entertaining/scary in the stands
for real though, I wish rednecks would be more into international soccer, Mexico-US games would be so much more entertaining/scary in the stands
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:43 pm to TheIrishFro
we will write up a proposal and send it to TRUTV. 
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:45 pm to TheIrishFro
I might be in the minority here but I'm actually fine with the rednecks not liking soccer
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:51 pm to UASports23
quote:
Concur. But, if LA hosted . .I guess it'd be at the Rose Bowl. I highly doubt they'd use Home Depot Center. It only holds 27,000
Remember, this hypothetical takes place in 2022. The stadium landscape will look different.
Possible venues:
New Meadowlands, NYC
Farmers Stadium (if it exists by then) or Rose Bowl, LA
Soldier Field, Chicago
Cowboys Stadium, Dallas
Reliant Stadium, Houston
Georgia Dome (or new stadium maybe), ATL
Qwest Field if grass, Seattle
Dolphins new stadium if they replace the old one, Miami
Arrowhead, KC
Chargers new stadium, SD
49ers new stadium, San Fran
There are so many question marks at this point, but we definitely have the venues for it.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 11:54 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Remember, this hypothetical takes place in 2022. The stadium landscape will look different.
The bid could include building a new stadium.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 12:00 am to NOTORlOUSD
I'd like to see the final be in Dallas...That fricken stadium would make me cream myself watching a WC final.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 12:01 am to LSUButt
the final should be held in DC,NY,or Dallas
Posted on 6/20/12 at 12:04 am to LSUButt
I really wish DC would have a better stadium. It's time for us to have a national stadium at our capital. I'm not saying we should not have international matches elsewhere in the country, but all competitive games should be in DC. If all other countries have a national stadium, why not us?
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 12:06 am
Posted on 6/20/12 at 5:44 am to TheIrishFro
quote:
I really wish DC would have a better stadium. It's time for us to have a national stadium at our capital. I'm not saying we should not have international matches elsewhere in the country, but all competitive games should be in DC. If all other countries have a national stadium, why not us?
FedEx Field is only 15 years old and seats around 80,000. I would like to see DC renovate RFK stadium into a true soccer venue, but I could never see the city spending that kind of money without an NFL or MLB tenant.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:10 am to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Possible venues:
New Meadowlands, NYC
Farmers Stadium (if it exists by then) or Rose Bowl, LA
Soldier Field, Chicago
Cowboys Stadium, Dallas
Reliant Stadium, Houston
Georgia Dome (or new stadium maybe), ATL
Qwest Field if grass, Seattle
Dolphins new stadium if they replace the old one, Miami
Arrowhead, KC
Chargers new stadium, SD
49ers new stadium, San Fran
you forgot DC with its 90k seat stadium
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:12 am to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
FedEx Field is only 15 years old and seats around 80,000. I would like to see DC renovate RFK stadium into a true soccer venue, but I could never see the city spending that kind of money without an NFL or MLB tenant.
fedex while modern as shite, just needs to go lol. Synder wants a new one back downtown at the rfk site and a WC bid might be the thing that could help him get it. When DC United finally gets their stadium rfk will be blown to shite
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:29 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
fedex while modern as shite, just needs to go lol. Synder wants a new one back downtown at the rfk site and a WC bid might be the thing that could help him get it. When DC United finally gets their stadium rfk will be blown to shite
I read on wikipedia that the Skins took 10,000 seats out of FedEx a few years ago and 4,000 more recently to make room for luxury boxes. Are they (mainly Dan Snyder) only doing that to drive up demand and seat license fees? We all know they could sell 120,000 seats every week if they wanted.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 9:13 am to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
I read on wikipedia that the Skins took 10,000 seats out of FedEx a few years ago and 4,000 more recently to make room for luxury boxes. Are they (mainly Dan Snyder) only doing that to drive up demand and seat license fees? We all know they could sell 120,000 seats every week if they wanted.
they took out the 10k ,(5 in each endzone) to create standing room only party decks. Thank god the skins don't have seat licenses. We could 120k if it was priced right but most fans are wanting the new stadium more around 70k but Danny wants 100K he can't be out done by Jerrah
Posted on 6/20/12 at 9:21 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
they took out the 10k ,(5 in each endzone) to create standing room only party decks. Thank god the skins don't have seat licenses. We could 120k if it was priced right but most fans are wanting the new stadium more around 70k but Danny wants 100K he can't be out done by Jerrah
Also, don't the Skins own the stadium and parking right now? They would have to convince DC to sell all of the land around RFK to get the same arrangement there. That would be expensive and a logistical nightmare.
Popular
Back to top


0






