- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Champions League/Europa Semi's Draw
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:52 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:52 am
About to be on in 10mins
no United
no United
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 5:25 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 5:21 am to StraightCashHomey21
Europa League match ups first
Benfica vs Juve
Valencia vs Sevilla
Palvel Nedved is in a 2000 euro looking suit with tennis shoes on
If Juve make the final they will be considered the away team
Benfica vs Juve
Valencia vs Sevilla
Palvel Nedved is in a 2000 euro looking suit with tennis shoes on
If Juve make the final they will be considered the away team
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 5:25 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 5:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
Madrid vs Bayern
boooooooooooooom
boooooooooooooom
Posted on 4/11/14 at 5:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
So Chelsea vs Atletico
Posted on 4/11/14 at 5:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
Real Madrid vs. Bayern Munich
Chelsea vs. Atletico Madrid
If I understood the guy correctly, even though Atletico Madrid was drawn first and thus should have the first home game, Chelsea will host the first game because Real Madrid and Atletico can't play in the same stadium on back to back nights?
nvm, they just changed it and said Atletico will be the home team for the first leg.
Chelsea vs. Atletico Madrid
If I understood the guy correctly, even though Atletico Madrid was drawn first and thus should have the first home game, Chelsea will host the first game because Real Madrid and Atletico can't play in the same stadium on back to back nights?
nvm, they just changed it and said Atletico will be the home team for the first leg.
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 5:44 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 6:31 am to RandySavage
Benfica(3-2)
Valencia (4-2)
Real (4-4)pk
Atletico (3-2)
Benfica
Atletico
My predictions on rest of the tourneys
Valencia (4-2)
Real (4-4)pk
Atletico (3-2)
Benfica
Atletico
My predictions on rest of the tourneys
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:25 am to Westlakeguy10
So, I'm seeing where UEFA has overruled that ridiculous clause Chelsea had for Courtois, and he can play without AM paying that fee?
Is that true?
Edit: apparently so Null and void
Is that true?
Edit: apparently so Null and void
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 7:29 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:35 am to TFTC
He shouldn't be allowed to play imo. That's how all loan deals work that I've been aware of.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:36 am to PTBob
That's only an EPL rule...
IMO he's an Integral part of that team and one of the reasons they've come so far... I'm glad he can play!
IMO he's an Integral part of that team and one of the reasons they've come so far... I'm glad he can play!
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 7:38 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:40 am to BeYou
quote:
If I understood the guy correctly, even though Atletico Madrid was drawn first and thus should have the first home game, Chelsea will host the first game because Real Madrid and Atletico can't play in the same stadium on back to back nights?
Yea i had no idea wtf he was rambling about
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:59 am to StraightCashHomey21
Bad news for Real 
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:06 am to hendersonshands
I don't care if he plays or not but it's ridiculous for UEFA to try and say they can null a contract agreed upon by all parties.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:09 am to TFTC
quote:
That's only an EPL rule...
IMO he's an Integral part of that team and one of the reasons they've come so far... I'm glad he can play!
Is it an EPL rule or is it a clause in the loan contract? It's BS that they can override a clause mutually agreed upon between parties like Randy said.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:22 am to PTBob
They can of it goes against their rules and regulations...
quote:
Both the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations contain clear provisions which strictly forbid any club to exert, or attempt to exert, any influence whatsoever over the players that another club may (or may not) field in a match. It follows that any provision in a private contract between clubs which might function in such a way as to influence who a club fields in a match is null, void and unenforceable so far as UEFA is concerned.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:40 am to TFTC
quote:
They can of it goes against their rules and regulations...
Or if they feel like it it seems.
Just last year Celtic played IF Elfsborg where they had Mo Bangura loaned out. This was the response from UEFA just last year:
quote:
"As we, in line with the FIFA regulations on status and transfer of players, consider a loan to be a transfer, we do not have any regulations regarding players not playing against their parent club whilst on loan to another club. If a player is duly registered on the player list of IF Elfsborg then he can play against any team that Elfsborg are drawn against."
"Any agreement between the two clubs that this player wouldn’t play against Celtic should Elfsborg be drawn against them is purely between the clubs. UEFA would not have any involvement or consideration of this agreement, it would be neither endorsed or enforceable by UEFA."
It's pretty clear that this is complete bullshite. Atletico got a great deal on one of the top keepers in the world and they knew this was a possibility when they took this deal.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:44 am to UPT
I'm not sure of Chelsea's plans for Courtois after this season, but if I were them I'd tell em to frick off. He can rot on the bench before he goes to Atletico.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:50 am to PTBob
There does seem to always be a lot of drama around him. I'm pretty close to the point where I'd be happy to cash in on him.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:57 am to UPT
quote:
"As we, in line with the FIFA regulations on status and transfer of players, consider a loan to be a transfer, we do not have any regulations regarding players not playing against their parent club whilst on loan to another club. If a player is duly registered on the player list of IF Elfsborg then he can play against any team that Elfsborg are drawn against."
"Any agreement between the two clubs that this player wouldn’t play against Celtic should Elfsborg be drawn against them is purely between the clubs. UEFA would not have any involvement or consideration of this agreement, it would be neither endorsed or enforceable by UEFA."
Wow. That's pretty brazen, even by UEFA standards, to be so openly corrupt.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:59 am to PTBob
Quit your bitching Chelsea fans, you dodged both Real and Bayern
Popular
Back to top

2








