- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:49 pm to engvol
quote:
Balogan was a one game suspension
AND the remainder of the ongoing contest.
Which he served.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:50 pm to Adam Banks
Let's not forget either that Ronaldo's act was purposeful and there was no VAR misuse. There's really no reason his got suspended other than being Ronaldo. If you want controversy, that's the controversial decision.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:51 pm to Adam Banks
FIFA also suspended one game red card punishments for Otamendi and Caicedo, the same as they did for Balogun. So there is also recent precedent for negating a one game suspension.
Again this is something FIFA did for four different players entering the World Cup who were going to have sit out WC games due to red cards. The U.S. is benefiting from the shift in policy but we didn’t start it. Four other countries, including a UEFA one, all got the benefit of FIFA invoking Article 27 before we did.
Again this is something FIFA did for four different players entering the World Cup who were going to have sit out WC games due to red cards. The U.S. is benefiting from the shift in policy but we didn’t start it. Four other countries, including a UEFA one, all got the benefit of FIFA invoking Article 27 before we did.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News