Started By
Message

re: You’re alive around 1890 and the Government comes out with this mandate.

Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:00 am to
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:00 am to
Greener would be the more correct term no doubt. Semantics
Posted by salty1
Member since Jun 2015
4429 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:00 am to
quote:

In the beginning stages it will cost, but not like oil exploration costs, buddy, come on. All you need is panels in a field and the sun and some wires running to power converter/storage stations. It's not really that $ relatively speaking


Right on cue, the government shill shows up.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6174 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:01 am to
quote:

price drops as technology advances


There are a ton of huge hurdles to adaptation of EVs on huge scale.

They range from mere technical hurdles, to issues with raw material availability (metals for batteries), to logistical/infrastructure (power plants, charging stations etc).

In addition, China, India, S America, and Africa will be staying on HCs while we handcuff ourselves with "green" bullshite.
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:02 am to
It's amazing these idiots think I'm some weird alter government hired troll. Lol go look me up on FB dude... You'll see how much of an idiot you sound like rn.
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:04 am to
The government fears people like me. Stop being an ignoramus, bud.
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
9595 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:04 am to
quote:

There are a ton of huge hurdles to adaptation of EVs on huge scale.


Inner city power networks, that have been installed for decades and not needed to be upgraded on a massive scale due to minimal growth, will require upgrades across the board when everyone is installing EVs in their homes.
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:06 am to
And that's a good thing. Even without the demand from EV the grid needed serious upgrading. You should know that.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 11:07 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:07 am to
quote:

And then just like flat screen tvs and literally anything else that's new on the market, people find cheaper ways to produce and the price drops even as technology continues to advance. Lol .. some of you people simply cannot think things out.
Now do similarly forced Hospital EMRs. When you're done sorting that out, tell us which tech wizard in the PotatoBrain Administration is choosing the winner between Hydrogen Fuel Cell and Lithium Battery Electric.
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18961 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:07 am to
As long as it doesn’t have red horseshoes
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:08 am to
We are way past lithium dude. Material sciences is taking off. All that technology will be old in a year, or already is
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 11:09 am
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6174 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

all you need is panels in a field and wires


I'll make sure to tell Dow, etc.
They run power plants at their large sites to power operations.

I'm sure they'll be happy to just go solar. As it's apparently more cost effective, and very simple.

Crazy how their engineers and scientists didn't think of this.
Posted by tiggerfan02 2021
HSV
Member since Jan 2021
2899 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:


Here is the things about EVs..

It will significantly drive up the cost of your power bill which will dwarf what you are paying in gas today.



The power grid is nowhere near capable of handling any major increase in the number of EVs either.
Not to mention...where do these idiots think that electricity is generated from?
It ain't coming from unicorns farting rainbows.
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
9595 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

And that's a good thing. Even without the demand from EV the grid needed serious upgrading. You should know that.


The transmission grid is the biggest item that needs to be addressed.

Distribution grids, especially those owned by utilities that are regulated, are limited to when they can add/upgrade their equipment.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14273 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Y'all don't know what y'all are talking about

I don’t share the same concerns about the obvious impracticality of a cutover to EVs and renewable energy sources that the rest of the Board has.

My resistance to changing the energy framework of the country while the rest of the world continues to use traditional energy sources is that it’s a decision that puts toxic, Western patriarchal, white supremacist, America-first thinking at its heart. Why do we think we’re so special that we should be the first to enjoy the benefits of safe, abundant, inexpensive, renewable energy sources before the rest of the planet, especially underserved Third World countries?

Supporters of the abrupt cutover to alternative energy are greedy, narcissistic, Neanderthals who can only think of themselves and are probably Ultra MAGA, too.
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:13 am to
quote:

EVs are being mandated across the board via this Administration’s policies.


Hey, it's not like he ran his campaign ending fossil fuels. Oh wait. Yes it was.
Posted by skiboman1
Cody, Wyoming
Member since Oct 2007
395 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:13 am to
And as far as emissions from production to utilization, EV vehicle produce MORE emissions that combustion cars until the EV is driven >50K miles. Thanks for helping with the environment.
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:14 am to
How much do you want to bet they all have green energy plans in place? How much?
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:16 am to
Lol wow... That's one out there take. So many fallacies to address
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
6570 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Not if we on a large scale start building more and more solar farms to harvest the energy of the sun. Costs will rapidly go down as energy will be available in abundance. I worked on the first industrial solar farm in Louisiana across the river in Rosedale. It powers 40,000 homes and only takes up less than 60-80 acres or so. As material sciences get better their efficiency and availability to all will only continue to bring costs down. Y'all don't know what y'all are talking about


Yes we are all hayseeds and hicks that live in caves.
Your solar panel energy conversion at best is 33%.Please read about the Shockley–Queisser limit. And this takes into account for a solar panel that is new. Overtime this energy conversion rate gets even lower.
Solar panels are true snake oil.
Maybe I should get into this scam too.
Posted by tiggerfan02 2021
HSV
Member since Jan 2021
2899 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

And as far as emissions from production to utilization, EV vehicle produce MORE emissions that combustion cars until the EV is driven >50K miles. Thanks for helping with the environment.




Then there is the little mentioned problem of what to do with all those dead batteries full of toxic waste 10-12 years down the road.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram