3
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You should visit a homogenous, high trust country at least once
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:02 am to Azkiger
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:02 am to Azkiger
quote:
We were 88% white in the 1900s
quote:
. Inviting in random black and brown populations
Well the black population wasn't "invited" in
And the Latinos were here before we expanded West
quote:
So you can point to China and Japan and the like all you want but you're not arguing with me.
Yes you want to avoid talking about them because it hurts your point about your vision of a white America that never existed. I understand
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:03 am to UtahCajun
My bad, read a "was" where there wasn't one.
My #2 point still stands.
My #2 point still stands.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pivot
Where did I plant a flag in 1789?
You brought up that date, not me.
quote:
Well the black population wasn't "invited" in
And the Latinos were here before we expanded West
Post 1900 we dropped from 88% white. I named my date. Keep up.
quote:
Yes you want to avoid talking about them
In a conversation about populations that bring our society down?
Yes, because they do not belong in such a conversation.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:09 am to Azkiger
quote:
Where did I plant a flag in 1789?
You cited the 1900s when Latinos were considered white.
Are you going to continue to maintain that stance?
quote:
Post 1900 we dropped from 88% white. I named my date. Keep up.
See above
quote:
In a conversation about populations that bring our society down?
You're pivoting HARD here.
This is a discussion about homogeneity. One of the examples in OP was non-white (Asian).
Try to keep on topic, as I've told you since you came into the thread with your off-topic, irrelevant silliness.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:12 am to Azkiger
Our current problem isn't that we are not homogenous. It is that liberals have such low expectations for non-whites that we have lowered the bar for everyone.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Now, in 2026, America is roughly 60% white, including white Hispanic…
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:14 am to VOR
If we counted Hispanics as white today like we did then, we'd likely see white into the 80s.
Then the biggest jump would be Asians
Then the biggest jump would be Asians
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:18 am to VOR
quote:
I’m not sure what meets your stated criteria, but when I did work in the Netherlands in the80’s it was pretty solid Northern European whitehead.
It was fun to visit, but I didn’t come away with any eye opening revelation other than the women were mostly gorgeous and friendly(not the red light denizens).
So you didn't see any Turks while you were there?
Funny thing is, I lived in Holland from 87 - 89. Smaller places like Utrecht were homogenous, but not the larger cities, like Amsterdam. Turks galore were already there. The Dutch already hated them even back then.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 8:19 am
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You cited the 1900s when Latinos were considered white
What % of our population was Latino then?
quote:
You're pivoting HARD here.
Nope, that sentiment was present from my first post onwards.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And the Latinos were here before we expanded West
So what? They took the land, we took it from them. That has no bearing on the time period he was talking about.
The black population has been invited to breed by the trillions thrown at them.
What is your fricking point exactly?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:21 am to Azkiger
quote:
What % of our population was Latino then?
I have no idea. Neither do you. They lumped everyone in as white
Doing so today puts white into the 80s
quote:
that sentiment
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:22 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
So what?
Read his post. His standard requires "Inviting in" these races. You can't "invite in' someone who was already here.
quote:
The black population has been invited to breed by the trillions thrown at them.
Holy fricking shite
quote:
What is your fricking point exactly?
You need to ask teh guy trying to derail the thread that question. His points are the ones confusing you.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What homogenous, high trust countries offer anything close to the economic future that America offers?
Japan? Clearly no.
The standard of living in many of these countries is better than that of the United States, but that's not the point he's making.
He's describing socio-political cultures that on matters of preserving culture, all pull in the same direction. They value the social harmony that homogeny brings. A harmony the United States hasn't seen since probably the early 60's.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 8:29 am
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I have no idea.
So by what standard are you disagreeing?
As we've become more diverse we've become less high trust.
Also laugh all you want I'm doing speech to text while I drive.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:29 am to Rambone
quote:
He's describing socio-political cultures that on matters of preserving culture, all pull in the same direction. They value the social harmony that homogeny brings. A harmony the United States hasn't seen since probably the early 60's.
And none of them offer economic opportunities or SOL like the US, even with our diverse populations (including our large underclass).
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:30 am to Azkiger
quote:
So by what standard are you disagreeing?
You don't have the data either.
We either include all latinos as white or we can't use the combined totals of the past to compare to today
This isn't complicated.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You don't have the data either.
How much data do you need to realize that we are less racially homogeneous today then we were in the 1900s?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Read his post. His standard requires "Inviting in" these races. You can't "invite in' someone who was already here.
"Mass migration has not occurred within recent decades. All black and brown individuals presently in this country have roots here for many generations."
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 8:52 am
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And none of them offer economic opportunities or SOL like the US, even with our diverse populations
Change "even" to "despite" and you'd be more correct.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When America was founded in 1789, there was a higher % of black people than today (roughly 13% today v. 18% then).
SFPLC is surprised to find out that importing lots of brown people lowers the percent population of the black population too.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News