- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You are Exempt from committing Sedition if You Have
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
I'm now advising for a reading of 2387
0
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How does telling people to follow the law and Constitution constitute a violation of that statute?
Because that is not the sum total of what they said.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:52 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Because that is not the sum total of what they said.
Only if you're intentionally misinterpreting their message, likely for partisan/team-based results.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only if you're intentionally misinterpreting their message, likely for partisan/team-based results.
I typed out the problematic part yesterday or the day before. It wasn't an interpretation issue.
Honestly, their message would have been above board, if cringe, but above board had they omitted the part we debated already.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:58 am to SallysHuman
The problem for your argument is there is no problematic portion.
They worded this intentionally intelligently, and it's causing this response
Just let it die. The whole point was to evoke a retarded response by the MAGA infrastructure, which it did, which is why you saw the quick pivot to "omg Trump didn't name them!"
This cope-spin via the Dennis Reynolds rhetoric is even worse.
They worded this intentionally intelligently, and it's causing this response
Just let it die. The whole point was to evoke a retarded response by the MAGA infrastructure, which it did, which is why you saw the quick pivot to "omg Trump didn't name them!"
This cope-spin via the Dennis Reynolds rhetoric is even worse.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 7:59 am to SallysHuman
It’s theater and nothing more
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:01 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Is it your position that members of the US military should NOT be reminded that they are not obliged to follow an illegal order?
Such a stupidly based question deserves nothing but ridicule.
Every member of the armed services gets schooled intensely on the proper way to respond to the chain of command.
They do not need to have lying, politically motivated, tongue in cheek, corrupt and amoral, wannabe online influencers making snide remarks about how to respond to orders from their superior officers.
They got this - in spades.
The incredibly idiotic statements made by these democrat wannabes should be the object of ridicule - and, given their positions in the legislature, should be sufficient to have them kicked out of any office of authority in the USA - those with military backgrounds should have all their honorariums revoked and subjected to public humiliation, with no possibility of ever holding any office of governmental authority or honor.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:03 am to GatorOnAnIsland
That dude looks a lot like a penis.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:07 am to SallysHuman
In fairness, I do think that you actually believe that advising members of our military to follow the law does constitute an invitation to insubordination.
That is a monumentally stupid thing to believe, but I do think you hold that belief in good faith.
That is a monumentally stupid thing to believe, but I do think you hold that belief in good faith.
This post was edited on 11/23/25 at 8:11 am
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:10 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:In summary, you agree with the proposition that only the people issuing illegal illegal orders should be allowed to remind service members that they are not obligated to follow illegal orders.
ChineseBandit58
OK
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:10 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In fairness, I do think that you actually believe that advising members of our military to follow the law does constitute an invitation insubordination.
That is not the full text of their PSA. You know it, I know it.
I tried googling the full text and can't find it (I wonder why)... The part that was a problem I did happen to type out in a thread on it.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:10 am to SallysHuman
Overall, this borders on a really stupid discussion.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just let it die.
bullshite - bullshite - bullshite
This crossed the line - and gave the finger to the whole military establishment in the process.
All for advancing the ONLY democrat action they have left === promoting seditious behavior from the entire population.
Nobody with any moral backbone or vision of honorable service should be silent with such a public and loud dishonorable statement such as this - all doctored up with sinister trappings relying on clumsily disguised 'reminders' of their sworn duties.
Next they'll line up to soberly and publicly remind the armed services to be sure and not shoot themselves in the foot.
You know the motive behind this statement - just as they knew exactly what mischief they were suggested - and for you to have any response other than absolute contempt for it gives away your not-so-skillfully-disguised devotion to the DEMOCRAT narratives of abject lies, misinformation, obstruction, and discontent.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:11 am to SallysHuman
quote:Because the entire Internet is conspiring against Trump. Duh.
I tried googling the full text and can't find it (I wonder why)...
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:12 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Because the entire Internet is conspiring against Trump. Duh.
Maybe you can find the full text.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:14 am to ChineseBandit58
Loosen up your panties, Frances.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:15 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
bullshite - bullshite - bullshite
This crossed the line - and gave the finger to the whole military establishment in the process.
quote:
You know the motive behind this statement - just as they knew exactly what mischief they were suggested - and for you to have any response other than absolute contempt for it gives away your not-so-skillfully-disguised devotion to the DEMOCRAT narratives of abject lies, misinformation, obstruction, and discontent.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:19 am to SallysHuman
quote:sure. It took one search and less than 30 seconds.
Maybe you can find the full text.
quote:
We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks each day to keep Americans safe. We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us.
You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders, you can refuse illegal orders, you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.
We know this is hard and that it's a difficult time to be a public servant, but whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army or Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical, and know that we have your back, because now more than ever, the American people need you.
We need you to stand up for our laws, our Constitution and who we are as Americans. Don't give up, don't give up, don't give up, don't give up the ship.
This post was edited on 11/23/25 at 8:23 am
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:24 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
RelentlessAnalysis
Sincerely, thank you... I couldn't even get chatGPT to pull it up.
Here is the part that I take issue with,
quote:
This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
This clearly sets up an us vs them scenario.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for a response that reveals your vacuum of integrity and honor.
Go ahead and be the butt-licker for any democrat narrative scam they choose to launch.
We all know it is 'legal' - but it is up to you to prove it is not dishonorable.
you fail at that -
and just so you'll understand
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
Go ahead and be the butt-licker for any democrat narrative scam they choose to launch.
We all know it is 'legal' - but it is up to you to prove it is not dishonorable.
you fail at that -
and just so you'll understand
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News